“Finland, traditionally one of the most disciplined European
Union (EU) member states, has received a warning signal from Brussels when it
comes to its budget.
At the end of November, the European Commission (EC), the
EU's main executive body, demanded that Helsinki prepare a realistic plan to
reduce the country's budget deficit, which has exceeded the EU's limit of 3
percent of gross domestic product (GDP).
The EC said that, according to forecasts, Finland's budget
deficit should reach 4.5 percent of GDP by the end of the year, and total debt
next year should reach 90 percent of GDP, or almost twice as much as in 2019.
Thus, the EU member state, whose GDP reaches 300 billion
euros, has officially found itself on the list of violators of EU financial
discipline and may face fines, stricter control from Brussels and a temporary
loss of funding.
Finland's low GDP growth and high Expenditure
Finland has struggled with budget discipline since the
global financial crisis of 2008-2009. The failure of mobile phone manufacturer
Nokia, once a dynamic global leader in the segment, has left the country
without one of its main economic engines.
The problems have only worsened in recent years, with high
social spending, a significantly increased defense budget and the economic blow
from the severance of energy and trade relations with Russia during the
conflict in Ukraine.
In 2021, before the events in Ukraine, bilateral trade
between Russia and Finland amounted to 12.71 billion euros. In the first three
quarters of this year, this figure fell by almost 93%.
The situation has been exacerbated by Finland's decision to
close its eastern border at the end of 2023 - for security reasons and in view
of the potential threat that Russia will use migration as a means of exerting
pressure. The move almost immediately halted tourism and cross-border trade,
dealing a particularly severe blow to the country’s eastern regions.
According to the Bank of Finland, more than 2,000 Finnish
companies exported to Russia in 2019. By the end of 2023, only about 100 such
companies remained. Jarkko Kivisto, an advisor at the Bank of Finland’s Analytical
Department, told Deutsche Welle that it was difficult to assess the direct
impact of reduced trade with Russia on the Finnish state budget. “We have not
calculated this effect precisely,” he admitted, adding that the impact was
indirect, “through weaker economic activity and lower taxes from Russian
tourists.”
Finland’s Defense Budget Rises Against Russia’s Ukraine
Action
Faced with manifestations of hybrid aggression (from
disinformation to airspace violations) attributed to Russia, Finland abandoned
its neutral status, joined NATO, and increased its defense spending from 5.1
billion euros in 2022 to more than 6.2 billion euros in 2024 (2.3 percent of
GDP). The country has pledged to increase defense spending to 3 percent of GDP
by 2029. That would make it one of the largest defense spenders in Europe.
Was the conflict in Ukraine the cause of Finland’s budget
deficit, which falls short of EU standards? Lauri Holappa, executive director
of the Finnish Center for New Economic Analysis, responded to this question
from Deutsche Welle: “It’s possible. Quite possible.”
“In a normal situation, one could assume that the resources
currently allocated to defense could have been redirected to more productive
purposes,” he added.
The rise in defense spending, the collapse of bilateral
trade with Russia, and the near-total loss of tourists from Russia have forced
the Finnish government to borrow more, even as the national debt was already
growing rapidly.
“The biggest impact was due to high energy prices, as
Finland was heavily dependent on Russian energy,” Heli Simola, chief economist
at the Bank of Finland’s Emerging Markets Research Institute, told Deutsche
Welle. Before the war in Ukraine, Finland bought about a third of its energy
from Russia, making it quite vulnerable if the EU decided to cut off Russian
natural gas and oil.
Energy crisis increases Finland’s oil import costs
Simola noted that the country has managed to switch from
Russia to other suppliers relatively quickly in terms of energy purchases, but
the price is much higher. According to the state statistics agency Statistics
Finland, the switch to other suppliers has made oil imports 109 percent more
expensive – in 2022 alone, around 6 billion euros were spent on the purchase of
black gold.
Meanwhile, Moscow is trying to instrumentalize the
discussion about Finland's state budget deficit, spreading disinformation and
exaggerating the economic consequences of the disruption of bilateral trade.
The Russians also claim that Finland has become financially unstable, although
in fact the deficit problem has been growing for years. The reasons for this
are an aging population, which is increasing spending on pensions and
healthcare, and a social security system that makes budget cuts politically
painful.
Finland faces years of austerity
Despite the difficulties, the Finnish government has adopted
one of the strictest budgets in the EU for 2025. It includes decisive spending
cuts and tax increases. In addition, under the new “debt brake” mechanism, all
political parties must adhere to a long-term strategy for reducing the budget
deficit. True, some politicians warn that in the future the country may have to
introduce additional austerity measures and raise taxes again.
“Economic growth alone will not be enough to restore the
budget balance,” believes J. Kivisto. “According to rough estimates, an
additional consolidation of about 3 percent of GDP, or 9-10 billion euros, will
be required over the next 5-10 years.”
However, since 80 percent of the Finland’s GDP is made up of
domestic sectors of the economy – consumption, services, construction, retail
trade and public sector employment – and economists warn that excessively
strict budgeting rules could stifle economic growth. “About a third of our
workforce is dependent on state funding, and ongoing austerity measures are
making workers worried about possible layoffs,” Holappa noted. “This
uncertainty is having a significant negative impact on consumer activity and is
hindering the recovery of demand, despite rising wages and falling interest
rates.”
“If we introduce strict austerity measures and strict
budgeting rules now, there is a risk that we simply will not be able to return
to a growth trajectory,” the expert added. Such warnings can be heard in
Finland, which, despite its financial problems, has consistently ranked first
in surveys of the world’s happiest countries for many years.”
Trump is right. EU elites are ruining all Western Europe.
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą