“The Chinese Ministry of Commerce on
Thursday announced more restrictions on the export of rare earth minerals,
crucial for manufacturing semiconductors, electric vehicles (EVs), green energy
products, and other key technologies.
The move was universally seen by
analysts as preparing the battlefield for an expected trade meeting between
dictator Xi Jinping and President Donald Trump.
China is the dominant worldwide
supplier of most of the 17 elements known as rare earths. Mines controlled by
China produce about 70 percent of the world’s supply of the minerals, and
Beijing controls 90% of the world’s processing capacity.
Processing rare earths is difficult
and expensive, with enormous start-up costs. China has been shrewd about using its
market dominance to make it very difficult for competitors from free-market
economies to challenge its position. For example, when China sees a push to
open more mines or processing plants in other countries, it floods the market
and drives prices down, making those competitive projects look unprofitable.
Also, few competing nations are
willing to sustain the environmental damage necessary to open new rare earth
mines – they are more comfortable subcontracting that ecological damage to
China.
Beijing achieved this level of
market discipline by imposing tight production quotas and export controls on
the chaotic rare earth mining industry of the 1990s and 2000s, just as the true
value of those minerals was becoming apparent. These controls made it very easy
for China to weaponize the industry for geopolitical purposes, as a cartel of a
half-dozen giant state-controlled companies now controls the worldwide supply
of minerals.
The nations of the free world are
well aware of the threat posed by giving Communist China near-total control
over such a vital supply chain, but so far efforts to reduce that threat by
“de-risking” the supply chain are moving slowly.
In April, China tried to completely
cut off rare earth exports to the United States in a show of force, but later
backed down to more modest restrictions. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce
tightened those restrictions on Thursday, including tougher permitting
requirements on the export of technology related to rare earth refinement, and
more curbs on the export of battery technology to protect China’s edge on
electric vehicles.
“The latest rules require
‘case-by-case approval’ on exports of rare earths for the design and production
of advanced semiconductors, including logic chips with process nodes of 14
nanometer or below and memory chips with 256 layers or more, as well as related
equipment and materials for these semiconductors,” the South China Morning Post
(SCMP) reported.
An infographic titled “Key critical
minerals and rare earth elements in smartphones” created in Ankara, Turkiye on
April 16, 2025. (Photo by Omar Zaghloul/Anadolu via Getty Images)
China also added five more rare
earth minerals to its list of restricted exports, including holmium, erbium,
thulium, europium, and ytterbium. Until now, only seven of the recognized rare
earths were on the restriction list.
“From a geostrategic perspective,
this helps with increasing leverage for Beijing ahead of the anticipated
Trump-Xi summit in Korea later this month,” Edge Research founder Tim Zhang
told Sky News.
Trump and Xi are expected to meet on
the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in South
Korea at the end of October.
The Chinese Commerce Ministry
insisted the new restrictions were needed to “better safeguard national
security” and prevent China’s rare-earth technology from being used in
“sensitive fields such as the military” by certain “overseas bodies and
individuals.” (https://radar.rp.pl/przemysl-obronny/art43154471-chiny-blokuja-zachodnia-zbrojeniowke)
China ratcheted up tensions even
further on Thursday by adding 14 foreign military and technology groups to its
“unreliable entities” list, limiting their ability to do business with Chinese
companies. Most of the entities added to the list were American and Canadian
companies that either cooperated with Taiwan or “made malicious remarks about
China.”"
Who else “made malicious remarks about
China.” - tiny Lithuania. Why? When a puppy cannot bite, but is very angry, it barks aggressively. Isn't that right, Your Excellency, President Nausėda?
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą