Sekėjai

Ieškoti šiame dienoraštyje

2026 m. kovo 21 d., šeštadienis

First Big Victory in a Drone War: Iran Sees an Opening to Control Mideast Energy Over Long Run

 


Repeating Venezuela’s trick with Iran, USA wanted to control China’s energy supply. That quite a bit of power for one nation to have. The power was consolidated. The USA were not able to take it. Now Iran is trying to take the newly consolidated power over China’s energy supply.

 

In March 2026, Iran is signaling a "first big victory" in its drone warfare campaign by leveraging low-cost unmanned systems to disrupt global energy markets and challenge Western military dominance in the Middle East. U.S. air superiority is now in doubt after hugely expensive F-35 was downed by Iran. Reports suggest Iran may have utilized infrared search and track (IRST) systems to target the stealth fighter's heat signature.

 

Strategic Objectives and Victory

 

Tehran's strategy revolves around using mass-produced drones to achieve long-term control over regional energy corridors:

 

    Energy Leverage: By targeting critical infrastructure—including Saudi refineries, Qatari LNG hubs, and Emirati ports—Iran has sent Brent crude prices soaring above $118 per barrel.

 

    Economic Attrition: Analysts from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) note that Iran uses drones costing roughly $20,000 to force the U.S. and its allies to expend interceptors costing millions, creating an "ugly math" for attackers of Iran.

 

    Strait of Hormuz Control: Iran's ambassador to Tunisia recently claimed "full control" over the Strait of Hormuz, using the waterway as leverage to demand respect for Iranian sovereignty in exchange for global energy security.

 

Recent Military Escalations (March 2026)

 

    March 19 Attacks: Iran launched extensive drone and missile strikes against Saudi, Qatari, Kuwaiti, and UAE energy sites in retaliation for an Israeli strike on the South Pars gas field.

 

    Saturation Tactics: In the first week of the conflict alone, the UAE detected over 1,400 drones. While many were intercepted, the sheer volume has disrupted operations at major hubs like the Ras Laffan Industrial City in Qatar.

 

    U.S. and Allied Response: The U.S. has scrambled to deploy new counter-drone systems, including "interceptor drones" designed to ram hostile UAVs, as reported by the Wall Street Journal.

 

Long-Term Implications

 

Iran's leadership views this as a turning point where unconventional, low-cost technology can offset the conventional military superiority of the U.S. and Israel. According to reports from the Washington Post and other outlets, Tehran believes it can now impose a settlement that entrenches its dominance over Middle East energy resources for decades.

 

Western publications repeat Iran’s points of talking, omitting the drone revolution problem:


“DUBAI -- Three weeks into the war, Iran's regime is signaling that it believes it is winning and has the power to impose a settlement on Washington that entrenches Tehran's dominance of Middle East energy resources for decades to come.

 

This attitude might prove to be a dangerous misreading of President Trump's determination, or of Israel's capacity to inflict blows on the Islamic Republic's surviving leadership and military capabilities.

 

Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel have given mixed signals on how long the war would go on, as they try to talk markets down and keep Tehran guessing. Netanyahu said Thursday the war would end "a lot faster than people think." Trump said Friday the U.S. is considering "winding down" its military operation in Iran, even as the Pentagon sent thousands of additional Marines to the region.

 

The problem is, Iran also has a say in when the guns fall silent -- and, for now, it seems to think time works to its benefit.

 

Despite optimistic U.S. and Israeli pronouncements about destroying launchers and missile stocks, Iran has retained the ability to fire dozens of ballistic missiles, and many more drones, every day across the Middle East.

 

Instead of declining, the rate of fire actually picked up in recent days compared with 10 days ago. Iranian strikes this past week badly damaged key energy installations in Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates -- while Iran's own oil exports kept booming.

 

Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, the Persian Gulf's chokepoint, remains only possible with Iranian permission. Surging oil and gas prices, meanwhile, are exacting growing pain on economies worldwide -- and pressuring Trump to end a war that he began in expectation of swift victory.

 

"The Iranians aren't ready to end the war because they have learned an important lesson: They can, comparatively easily and cheaply, cause a lot of damage and disruption. They now want the whole world to learn that lesson, too," said Dina Esfandiary, an analyst on Iran and author of a book on Iran's foreign relations.

 

Seeing its leverage, Tehran has pledged it would agree to a cease-fire only if Washington and the Gulf states pay a steep price. The spokesman of the Iranian parliament's foreign affairs and defense committee, Ebrahim Rezaei, said after Friday's meeting with military commanders that any talks with the U.S. are off the agenda as Tehran "focuses on punishing the aggressors." Other Iranian leaders have been just as triumphalist, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi describing Iran as another Vietnam for the U.S.

 

That rhetoric may underestimate Washington's resolve.

 

"This hubris is dangerous because they are not smart enough to understand that President Trump will never let them win. They don't understand how far he's willing to go," said Jason Greenblatt, who served as the White House special envoy for the Middle East in the first Trump administration. "This can come at a huge cost, but the cost of not taking care of the problem will be many times more expensive over many, many years."

 

Demands voiced by Iranian leaders in recent days as conditions for ending the war include massive reparations from the U.S. and its allies and the expulsion of U.S. military forces from the region. They have also called for transforming the Strait of Hormuz -- an international waterway where free navigation is guaranteed under international law -- into an Iranian toll booth controlling one-third of the world's shipborne crude oil.

 

Iran is planning to enshrine a "new status" for the Strait of Hormuz to require every passing ship to pay fees to Tehran for the privilege, Expediency Council member Mohammad Mokhber, an adviser to the supreme leader on economic affairs, told the country's Mehr news agency. "Iran will turn its position from a sanctioned country to an enhanced power in the region and the world," he said.

 

It is hard to imagine the U.S. -- or the Gulf states -- accepting such an arrangement. Trump has repeatedly vowed to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, by force if necessary, and has ordered Marine expeditionary units to sail to the Middle East. A U.S. effort to secure shipping lanes through the strait would be "a simple military maneuver" with "so little risk," Trump said Friday in a Truth Social post criticizing European allies for refusing to join the mission.

 

In the age of drones and portable antiship missiles, retaking the strait would be anything but simple, but not impossible, military experts said. Round-the-clock intelligence and surveillance flights that are now available because of U.S. air superiority, combined with rapid targeting of Iranian weapons systems, could make the difference, said retired U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. David Deptula, dean of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies.

 

"It's not something that is going to happen overnight, but over time the Strait of Hormuz will be open back to the levels of shipping that we saw before this conflict broke out. It is a reasonable estimate that it will be a matter of weeks," he said. "The Iranians are not going to end up with control over the strait, we are."

 

Indeed, the geopolitical implications of allowing Iran to end up in charge of the waterway would be unacceptable, said Sanam Vakil, director of the Chatham House think tank's Middle East and North Africa program. "If the U.S. cuts and runs, leaving Iran's Islamic Republic to do what it does best -- hold everyone hostage -- then the war will be a categorical failure for the United States," she said.” [1]

 

Consolidating power is always risky – more prepared nation might take it.

 

1. Iran Sees an Opening to Control Mideast Energy Over Long Run. Trofimov, Yaroslav.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 21 Mar 2026: A1.  

Will Lithuania disappear?

 

Where are the Prussians, the third, next to the Latvians, great Baltic nation? We will be there soon too. And our territory will be one big German and Polish military training ground.

The Prussians, as a nation, ceased to exist back in the early 18th century, when after long wars and hardships the remaining old inhabitants were finally assimilated by German colonists. Their language disappeared, and the historical lands (from the Vistula to the Nemunas) were divided between Poland and Russia (Kaliningrad region) after World War II, when Germans lost.

That is why the Lithuanian elite (unlike the Hungarian elite) is trying to set us against the Russians and Belarusians, in whose neighborhood we have lived for millennia. The Lithuanian elite is, bought by the Germans, the destroyer of the Lithuanian nation. Let's drive our elite out of power during the elections. Bring flowers to the Mother of Pirčiupis.

Ar Lietuva išnyks?


Kur prūsai, trečia, greta latvių, didelė baltų tauta? Mes ten irgi greitai būsime. O mūsų teritorija bus vienas didelis vokiečių ir lenkų poligonas.

Prūsai, kaip tauta, nustojo egzistuoti dar XVIII a. pradžioje, kai po ilgų karų ir negandų likusius senuosius gyventojus galutinai asimiliavo vokiečių kolonistai. Jų kalba išnyko, o istorinės žemės (nuo Vyslos iki Nemuno) po Antrojo pasaulinio karo, kai vokiečiai pralaimėjo, buvo padalintos Lenkijai ir Rusijai (Kaliningrado sritis).

Štai kodėl Lietuvos elitas (skirtingai nuo vengrų elito) bando sukiršinti mus su rusais ir baltarusiais, kurių kaimynystėje mes gyvenome tūkstantmečius. Lietuvos elitas yra, vokiečių nupirktas, lietuvių tautos naikintojas. Vykime jį iš valdžios rinkimų metu. Gėlių Pirčiupio motinai.

2026 m. kovo 20 d., penktadienis

Vengrijos Orbanas ir Slovakijos Fico blokuoja 100 milijardų dolerių paramą Ukrainai

 


 

Zelenskis neslepia, kad jei jis galėtų, tai visai atkirstų pigią naftą Vengrijai ir Slovakijai. Todėl abu vadovai juo nepasitiki. 

 

„BRIUSELIS. Ketvirtadienį Ukrainos gebėjimas tęsti kovą buvo suabejotas po to, kai Vengrijos ministras pirmininkas Viktoras Orbanas atsisakė atšaukti savo veto dėl daugiau nei 100 milijardų dolerių paskolos, o tai kėlė grėsmę Kijevo finansams, nes pasaulinis dėmesys nukrypsta į Artimuosius Rytus ir kyla naftos kainos.

 

Europos Sąjungos pareigūnai tebėra tikisi, kad artimiausiomis dienomis pavyks išspręsti aklavietę. Tačiau Ukrainai pinigų reikia per kelias savaites, kad vyriausybė galėtų toliau funkcionuoti, todėl ES pareigūnai gali būti priversti griebtis kitų trumpalaikių Ukrainos finansavimo galimybių, jei nebus rastas sprendimas.

 

Ukrainos prezidentas Volodymyras Zelenskis ragino ES pradėti teikti paskolą šių metų pradžioje, tačiau gegužės pradžia laikoma absoliučia riba, kad Kijevas galėtų įsigyti vakarietiškų ginklų ir apmokėti pagrindines paslaugas bei atlyginimus.

 

Ukrainos finansavimo užtikrinimas tapo svarbiausiu ES lyderių, kurie ketvirtadienį susitiko Briuselyje, prioritetu po to, kai Trumpo administracija praėjusiais metais nutraukė JAV finansinę paramą Kijevui. Dėl šio atsitraukimo ES ir kitos Europos šalys didžiąją laiko dalį buvo įklimpusios į naštą.“ Ukrainai reikalingi pinigai.

 

Karas Artimuosiuose Rytuose blogina Ukrainos padėtį. Konfliktas padidino naftos kainas, o tai naudinga Rusijos ekonomikai. Atskirai šį mėnesį JAV laikinai panaikino sankcijas Rusijos naftos pardavimui, taip padidindamos Maskvos pajamas. Tuo tarpu JAV ir Izraelio išpuoliai prieš Iraną sekina karinės įrangos atsargas, kurias Europa pirko iš Vašingtono Ukrainai.

 

Orbanas gruodžio mėnesį iš principo sutiko su paskola Ukrainai, prie kurios Vengrija neturėtų prisidėti, tačiau pastarosiomis savaitėmis dėl pykčio su Kijevu pakeitė savo poziciją. Jis apkaltino Ukrainą sąmoningai vilkinant pažeisto naftotiekio, kuriuo Rusijos nafta tiekiama į Vengriją ir Slovakiją, remontą, o Kijevas tai neigia.

 

„Laukiame naftos“, – ketvirtadienį sakė Orbanas, eidamas į ES lyderių susitikimą. „Iki tol negalime paremti jokio Ukrainą palankaus pasiūlymo.“

 

„Paskola lieka blokuota, nes vienas lyderis nesilaiko savo žodžio“, – po viršūnių susitikimo sakė Europos komisarė Ursula von der Leyen.

 

„Tačiau leiskite man pakartoti tai, ką jau sakiau Kijeve: mes tai įgyvendinsime vienaip arba kitaip.“

 

Orbanas, artimas JAV prezidento Trumpo sąjungininkas, savo pasipriešinimą Ukrainai ir pažeistam naftotiekiui panaudojo kaip kliūtį prieš balandžio mėnesio rinkimus, kuriuos jo partija gali pralaimėti pirmą kartą per 16 metų. Jo atsisakymas laikytis ankstesnio susitarimo, leidžiančio tęsti paskolos Ukrainai teikimą, kursto diskusijas ES apie tai, kaip izoliuoti Vengriją, jei jis liks valdžioje po rinkimų.

 

Ketvirtadienio lyderių susitikime kilo įtampa dėl Orbano blokavimo taktikos, atspindinčios daugelį metų trukusį nusivylimą dėl jo pasipriešinimo daugeliui bloko planų.

 

Šią savaitę ES į Ukrainą išsiuntė techninę komandą apžiūrėti naftotiekio ir įvertinti, kiek laiko gali užtrukti remontas.“ [1]

 

Slovakijos ministras pirmininkas Robertas Fico prisijungė prie Vengrijos Viktoro Orbano, atsisakydamas pritarti ES 90 mlrd. eurų paskolos paketui Ukrainai. Atsisakydamas paremti išvadas, Fico iš esmės remia vilkinimą, nes šių lėšų išmokėjimui reikalingas visų 27 ES valstybių narių vieningas pritarimas.

 

Svarbiausios detalės apie blokavimą:

 

Jungtinė opozicija: Fico ir Orbanas atsisakė paremti sutarimą dėl finansinės pagalbos paketo Ukrainai, kuris apima šių ir kitų metų finansavimą.

 

Problema: Blokavimas kyla dėl to, kad reikia vieningo visų ES narių pritarimo, leidžiančio vienai tautai – arba nedidelei grupei – stabdyti procesą.

 

Kontekstas: Fico, dažnai laikomas Vladimiro Putino sąjungininku, kartu su Orbanu kaltinamas ES paramos vilkinimu.

 

Alternatyvi parama: Nepaisant to, kitos tautos (pvz., JK) toliau teikia atskiras dvišales paskolas Ukrainos gynybai paremti.

 

Europos Komisijos pirmininkė Ursula von der Leyen pažadėjo skirti finansavimą, teigdama, kad tai bus padaryta „vienu ar kitu būdu“, o tai rodo pastangas apeiti aklavietę.

 

Paminėdama tik Orbaną ir nepuolanti Fico, sena ginekologė Ursula von der Leyen įrodo, kad taip ilgai sėdėdama bevertėje ES pozicijoje ji išmoko pagrindinę Machiavelli taisyklę: „Skaldyk ir valdyk“.

 

1. World News: Hungary's Orban Blocks $100 Billion in Aid for Ukraine. Kim Mackrael; Norman, Laurence.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 20 Mar 2026: A8.  

Hungary's Orban and Slovakia's Fico Block $100 Billion in Aid for Ukraine

 

Zelensky makes no secret that if he could, he would completely cut off cheap oil to Hungary and Slovakia. That's why both leaders don't trust him. 

 

“BRUSSELS -- Ukraine's ability to continue fighting was thrown into question on Thursday after Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban refused to lift his veto on a loan of more than $100 billion, threatening Kyiv's finances as global attention shifts to the Middle East and oil prices surge.

 

European Union officials remain hopeful they can resolve the impasse in the coming days. But Ukraine needs the money within weeks to keep its government functioning, so EU officials may be forced to resort to other short-term options for funding Ukraine if no resolution emerges.

 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had urged the EU to start delivering the loan at the beginning of this year, but early May is seen as the absolute cutoff to help Kyiv purchase Western weapons and pay for basic services and wages.

 

Securing funding for Ukraine became a crucial priority for EU leaders, who met on Thursday in Brussels, after the Trump administration last year withdrew U.S. financial support for Kyiv. The pullback left the EU and other European countries on the hook for most of the money Ukraine needs.

 

War in the Middle East is worsening Ukraine's situation. The conflict has pushed up oil prices, which benefits Russia's economy. Separately, the U.S. moved this month to temporarily lift sanctions on Russian oil sales, adding more revenue for Moscow. Meanwhile, U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran are draining stocks of military equipment that Europe was buying from Washington for Ukraine.

 

Orban in December had agreed in principle to the loan for Ukraine -- to which Hungary isn't expected to contribute -- but reversed course in recent weeks over anger with Kyiv. He has accused Ukraine of deliberately stalling repairs to a damaged pipeline that carries Russian oil to Hungary and Slovakia, a charge Kyiv denies.

 

"We are waiting for the oil," Orban said Thursday on his way into the EU leaders' meeting. "Until then, we cannot support any pro-Ukrainian proposal."

 

"The loan remains blocked because one leader is not honoring his word," European Commission Ursula von der Leyen said after the summit.

 

"But let me reiterate what I already said in Kyiv: we will deliver one way or the other."

 

Orban, a close ally of U.S. President Trump, has used his opposition to the Ukraine and the damaged pipeline as a wedge issue ahead of an election in April that his party could lose for the first time in 16 years. His refusal to stick to an earlier agreement to allow the Ukraine loan to proceed is fueling talk in the EU about how to isolate Hungary if he remains in power after the election.

 

Thursday's leaders meeting grew tense over Orban's blocking tactics, reflecting years of frustration with his resistance to many of the bloc's plans.

 

The EU sent a technical team to Ukraine this week to inspect the pipeline and estimate how long any repairs might take.” [1]

 

Slovakia's Prime Minister Robert Fico has aligned with Hungary's Viktor Orbán in refusing to endorse the EU’s €90 billion loan package for Ukraine. By declining to back the conclusions, Fico is effectively supporting the hold-up, as the release of these funds requires unanimity among all 27 EU member states.

 

Key details regarding the blockage:

 

    Joint Opposition: Fico and Orbán both refused to support the consensus on the financial aid package for Ukraine, which covers funding for this year and the next.

    The Issue: The blockage arises from the need for unanimous approval from all EU members, allowing a single nation—or a small group—to stall the process.

    Context: Fico, often seen as an ally of Vladimir Putin, is accused alongside Orban of stalling EU support.

    Alternative Support: Despite this, other nations (like the UK) continue to push forward with separate bilateral loans to support Ukraine's defense.


European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has vowed to deliver the funding, suggesting it will be done "one way or the other," indicating efforts to bypass the deadlock.

By mentioning only Orban and neglecting to attack Fico, old gynaecologist Ursula von der Leyen proves that sitting for so long in useless EU position she learned main rule of Machiavelli: “Divide and conquer”.

 

1. World News: Hungary's Orban Blocks $100 Billion in Aid for Ukraine. Kim Mackrael; Norman, Laurence.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 20 Mar 2026: A8.  

„OpenAI“ programėlė sujungs dirbtinį intelektą, „Codex“ ir naršyklę

 

“„OpenAI“ planuoja suvienyti savo „ChatGPT“ programėlę, kodavimo platformą „Codex“ ir naršyklę į vieną darbalaukio „superprogramėlę“ – tai žingsnis, siekiant supaprastinti naudotojo patirtį ir toliau sutelkti dėmesį į inžinerijos ir verslo klientus.

 

Taikymų vadovas Fidji Simo prižiūrės pokyčius ir padės įmonės pardavimų komandai reklamuoti naują produktą. „OpenAI“ prezidentas Gregas Brockmanas, kuris šiuo metu vadovauja įmonės skaičiavimo padaliniui, padės Simo prižiūrėti produkto atnaujinimą ir susijusius organizacinius pokyčius, teigė „OpenAI“ atstovė spaudai.

 

Strategijos pakeitimas žymi didelį pokytį nuo praėjusių metų, kai „OpenAI“ pristatė seriją atskirų produktų, kurie ne visada patiko naudotojams ir kartais sukeldavo susitelkimo stoką įmonėje. „OpenAI“ vadovai tikisi, kad suvieniję savo produktus vienoje programėlėje, ji galės supaprastinti išteklius, siekdama aplenkti konkurentės „Anthropic“ sėkmę.

 

„OpenAI“ siekia sutelkti dėmesį į „agentinių“ dirbtinio intelekto galimybių kūrimą naujoje superprogramėlėje, kurioje dirbtinio intelekto sistemos gali autonomiškai dirbti su naudotojo kompiuteriu, skirtu atlikti įvairias užduotis, įskaitant programinės įrangos rašymą ir duomenų analizę, teigia „OpenAI“.

 

„Supratome, kad savo pastangas išsklaidome per daug programų ir paketų, ir kad turime jas supaprastinti“, – ketvirtadienį vidiniame pranešime darbuotojams pasidalijo Simo. „Šis susiskaldymas mus stabdo ir apsunkina norimos kokybės ribos pasiekimą.“

 

„The Wall Street Journal“ savininkė „News Corp“ bendradarbiauja su „OpenAI“ turinio licencijavimo srityje.

 

„The Wall Street Journal“ pranešė, kad aukščiausi vadovai, įskaitant generalinį direktorių Samas Altmanas, vyriausiasis tyrimų pareigūnas Markas Chenas ir Simo, pastarąsias kelias savaites peržiūrėjo „OpenAI“ produktų portfelį ir ieškojo sričių, kurioms reikėtų skirti mažiau dėmesio. Praėjusią savaitę vykusiame visų narių susitikime Simo darbuotojams sakė, kad jie negali sau leisti blaškytis dėl „šalutinių užduočių“, atsižvelgiant į greitą „Anthropic“ sėkmę, pritraukiant verslo ir programavimo klientus. Ji teigė, kad bendrovė elgiasi taip, lyg jai būtų taikomas „raudonas kodas“.

 

„OpenAI“ kovoja su „Anthropic“ dėl pardavimų didinimo iš įmonių, norinčių įsigyti dirbtinio intelekto įrankių, kurie didina jų produktyvumą. darbuotojų. Pardavimas įmonėms nebuvo iš pradžių „OpenAI“ pagrindinis tikslas, tačiau vėliau, pamačiusi „Anthropic“ produktų „Claude Code“ ir „Cowork“ sėkmę, bendrovė atnaujino savo pastangas.

 

Abu startuoliai svarsto galimybę viešai kotiruotis jau metų pabaigoje ir skuba pasiekti ambicingus investuotojams iškeltus pajamų augimo tikslus.

 

„OpenAI“ atstovė spaudai teigė, kad naujoji „superprogramėlė“ leis „OpenAI“ komandoms glaudžiau bendradarbiauti ir padės tyrimų padaliniui sutelkti pastangas į vieno centrinio produkto tobulinimą. Per ateinančius mėnesius bendrovė tikisi pridėti naujų „agentinių“ galimybių savo „Codex“ programėlėje, kad ji galėtų padėti atlikti su produktyvumu susijusias užduotis, neapsiribojant kodavimu, prieš sujungiant „ChatGPT“ ir „Atlas“ naršyklę į superprogramėlę.“ [1]

 

 

1. OpenAI App to Unify AI, Codex, Browser. Berber, Jin.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 20 Mar 2026: B1.

OpenAI App to Unify AI, Codex, Browser

 


 

“OpenAI plans to unify its ChatGPT app, coding platform Codex and browser into a desktop "superapp," a step to simplify the user experience and continue with efforts to focus on engineering and business customers.

 

Chief of Applications Fidji Simo will oversee the change and focus on helping the company's sales team market the new product. OpenAI President Greg Brockman, who currently leads the company's computing efforts, will help Simo oversee the product revamp and related organization changes, an OpenAI spokeswoman said.

 

The strategy change marks a major shift from last year, when OpenAI launched a series of stand-alone products that didn't always resonate with users and sometimes created a lack of focus within the company. OpenAI executives hope that unifying its products under one app will allow it to streamline resources as it seeks to beat back the success of rival Anthropic.

 

OpenAI seeks to focus on creating "agentic" AI capabilities within the new superapp, in which artificial-intelligence systems can work autonomously on a user's computer to carry out a variety of tasks, including writing software and analyzing data, according to OpenAI.

 

"We realized we were spreading our efforts across too many apps and stacks, and that we need to simplify our efforts," Simo shared in an internal note with employees Thursday. "That fragmentation has been slowing us down and making it harder to hit the quality bar we want."

 

News Corp, owner of The Wall Street Journal, has a content-licensing partnership with OpenAI.

 

Top executives including Chief Executive Sam Altman, Chief Research Officer Mark Chen and Simo have spent the last few weeks reviewing OpenAI's product portfolio and looking at areas to make less of a priority, The Wall Street Journal reported. In an all-hands meeting last week, Simo told employees they couldn't afford to be distracted by "side quests" given Anthropic's rapid success winning over enterprise and coding customers. She said the company was very much acting as if it were under a "code red."

 

OpenAI is in a business battle with Anthropic to increase sales from companies looking to buy AI tools that boost productivity for their employees. Selling to enterprises wasn't an initial focus for OpenAI, but the company has since renewed its efforts after seeing the breakout success of Anthropic's Claude Code and Cowork products.

 

Both startups are considering public listings as soon as the end of the year and are racing to meet ambitious revenue-growth targets outlined to investors.

 

An OpenAI spokeswoman said the new "superapp" will enable teams inside OpenAI to work more closely together and help the research division focus its efforts around improving one central product. Over the coming months, the company expects to add new "agentic" capabilities within its Codex app so it can help with productivity-related tasks beyond coding before merging ChatGPT and the Atlas browser into the superapp as well.” [1]

 

1. OpenAI App to Unify AI, Codex, Browser. Berber, Jin.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 20 Mar 2026: B1.