"Lithuania is one of Israel's most consistent supporters. At
the end of May, the vast majority of European Union (EU) countries approved a
resolution to review the cooperation agreement with Israel over alleged human
rights violations in the Gaza Strip. Even normally loyal Israeli supporters
like the Netherlands voted in favor. Lithuania was among the minority that
voted against the resolution. It maintains very close ties with the Jewish
state, and last week Lithuania solemnly received Israeli diplomat Gideon Saar.
Lithuanian Foreign Minister Kęstutis Budrys recently stated
that the time is not yet right for actions such as the EU resolution on the
cooperation agreement. But will it ever be the right time for K. Budrys to
openly criticize Israel's actions in Gaza?
The Gaza Health Ministry claims that more than 57 thousand
people have already been killed as of July 1, about 60 percent of them women,
children and seniors. Studies by European epidemiologists conclude that as many
as 100,000 Palestinians may have died. Israel is restricting food supplies to
Gaza, even though modern international criminal law considers the starvation of
civilians a war crime, a crime against humanity, or an act of genocide.
Amnesty International, an international non-governmental
human rights organization, found sufficient grounds in November last year to
conclude that Israel is committing genocide, treating the Palestinians in Gaza
“as an inferior group, unworthy of human rights and dignity, demonstrating its
intention to physically destroy them.” Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez
called Israel a “genocidal state” and declared that Spain “will not have
business dealings with such a country.” Lithuania seeks to expand those ties.
The United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on the Occupied
Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese, accused Israel of being
responsible for “one of the worst genocides in modern history” and called on
countries to impose an arms embargo and cut off trade with the country.
What actions could change Budrys’s stance, convincing him
that now is the right time? A week ago, an Israeli plane hit the al-Baqa cafe
in Gaza City, which had been open throughout the conflict and was full of women
and children at the time. The super-powerful bomb killed about 40 people and
left a crater at least two meters deep. There may be another similar cafe, and
until Israel razes it to the ground, Budrys will continue to insist that it is
not yet the right time to criticize Israel.
The health care system is degraded. At least 94 percent of
all hospitals in the Gaza Strip are damaged or destroyed. Only a few
overcrowded hospitals are open, lacking the most basic medicines and forced to
treat the wounded in the corridors after major Israeli attacks. Perhaps the
time will not be right for K. Budrys until at least one hospital continues its
work, albeit in the most terrible conditions?
How many Palestinian newborns, infants and toddlers must
starve before K. Budrys decides that the time is right? They will not die of
starvation, but constant hunger, the lack of access to milk, meat, fruits and
vegetables will have indelible negative consequences for their health for many
years, if not their entire lives. How long will K. Budrys insist that it is not
yet the right time to put pressure on Israel to ensure normal food and other
supplies to Gaza?
The target of the denial of food and other supplies is not
Hamas fighters, who will somehow get their food, but the civilians of Gaza -
non-combatants in the truest sense of the word. When they become targets, we
need to protest, try to protect them in some way, or at least condemn those who
illegally persecute them. But, according to K. Budrys, the time is not yet
right.
The grim situation is perhaps most clearly illuminated by
these data. Compared to other wars of this century, Gaza leads in the ratio of
killed combatants to non-combatants, as well as in the number of deaths
compared to the number of inhabitants. The share of women and children killed
is more than twice as high as in almost all other recent conflicts. It is not
surprising that Israel is increasingly accused of genocide.
K. Budrys knows, or at least must know, what Israel is doing
in Gaza (and to a much lesser extent in the West Bank), so why is it silent and
how does it justify its appalling indifference to the killing and suffering of
Palestinians? I don’t know, and maybe he himself doesn’t know. People often
avoid honestly examining their conscience on sensitive issues, because
acquittal is unlikely.
Like most Lithuanian leaders, K. Budrys is probably
convinced that it is important to maintain good relations with Israel, that a
policy of support wins favor in Washington, and that critical statements or
support for plans to increase pressure will not have a serious impact, because
Israel will ignore them. They probably still feel some guilt about Lithuanian
participation in the Holocaust. There are reasons that explain Lithuanian
policy and K. Budrys's positions, but there are no arguments to support them. K.
Budrys is deeply involved in the position of minister, not only implements but
also shapes Lithuania's foreign policy, and also enjoys the attention of the
foreign press. He inevitably bears responsibility when this policy does not
correspond to simple decency. Talking about a foreign policy based on values is
a misunderstanding or mockery. Active support for Israel, when there is no
danger to the country and when its armed forces constantly violate the rules of
war, raises the suspicion that K. Budrys does not have a moral compass or, if
he had one, he has lost it.
It is a pity that Lithuania, having borne the burden of
occupations for so long and painfully, has so quickly become an apologist for
repression and killings. To claim, as K. Budrys does, that the humanitarian
situation in the Gaza Strip cannot be ignored, but to do so immediately, shows
that the demands of morality in this matter are secondary to him, if not
completely alien to him.”
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą