Record U.S. natural gas prices, especially for winter
heating, are driven by booming LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas) exports to Europe
and Asia, record demand from data centers, and slower oil drilling reducing
associated gas, creating domestic shortages despite near-record production.
These exports, meant to supply allies replacing Russian gas, divert molecules
from the U.S. market, causing price spikes that impact consumers and create
political tension.
Key Factors Driving High Prices:
Record LNG Exports: U.S. companies
are sending massive amounts of gas overseas, primarily to Europe, leading to
tighter domestic supply and higher costs for American homes and businesses.
Europe's Energy Needs: European nations,
weaning off Russian gas, have a huge appetite for U.S. LNG, creating strong international
demand that pulls gas out of the U.S. market.
Data Center Boom:
The rapid growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is fueling massive new energy
demand from data centers, adding to overall domestic demand for natural gas.
Reduced Oil Drilling:
Lower crude oil prices have slowed oil drilling, which also reduces the
production of natural gas that comes out of the same wells (associated gas).
Structural Supply
Tightness: While production is high, the pace of exports is outpacing supply
growth, altering the domestic balance and causing rapid price increases.
Impact on Consumers:
Higher Heating Bills: The record export
pace means less gas available for U.S. consumers during winter, pushing up
prices for home heating.
Affordability Crisis: Surging gas prices
contribute to broader cost-of-living concerns, creating political issues for
leaders like President Trump, who have pushed for energy dominance through
exports.
The "Molecules of Freedom" Concept:
The phrase
highlights the shift of U.S. natural gas ("molecules") to
international markets, often framed as providing energy security
("freedom") to allies, but it comes at the cost of domestic
affordability and supply.
Outlook:
New LNG export
facilities coming online are expected to increase export capacity further,
potentially worsening the domestic supply crunch, despite calls for U.S.
Congress to intervene.
Below is the analysis with more details:
"The "energy dominance" strategy, which Donald
Trump made the banner of his return to the White House, turned out to be not so
easy to implement. In recent years, the US has promised to flood the world with
cheap resources and simultaneously lower bills for American households. But
while LNG terminals in Texas are breaking records for gas shipments to Europe,
trying to replace Russian gas, the US has unexpectedly faced a problem of fuel
availability. Gas prices have soared to three-year highs, coal-fired power
plants, which environmentalists had already written off, are returning to
operation, and ordinary Americans are finding that they are paying for the
energy security of the European Union out of their own pockets.
The Price of Solidarity
The American gas market is in turmoil by the end of 2025:
wholesale prices have jumped by more than 70% in the last 12 months. In early
December, quotes at the key Henry Hub in Texas broke the $5.29 per million
British thermal units (MMBtu) mark. This is the highest level since December
2022, when the global hydrocarbon market was in turmoil due to the consequences
of the start of the Ukrainian crisis and the rupture of Europe's energy ties
with Russia.
The reason for this surge lies on the surface – the Atlantic
Ocean. The US is exporting record volumes of gas. According to the Energy Information
Administration (EIA), in September 2025, exports reached a record 9.41 million
tons. In total, the country plans to export about 421 million cubic meters per
day, or 153 billion cubic meters per year, which is 25% more than in 2024.
One last drink: Europe is buying Russian gas before the
cessation of supplies
The volume of natural gas supplies from Russia to EU
countries has increased to a record level
Launch New terminals, such as Plaquemines LNG in Louisiana,
have opened the floodgates for the outflow of natural gas abroad. Europe,
striving to buy as much as possible to avoid returning to purchases from
Russia, has become the main beneficiary. However, for the American market, this
has created a communicating vessels effect: by exporting gas, America is
importing high world prices. As IEEFA analyst Clark Williams-Derry noted,
"this is great news for the gas industry, but bad for the consumer."
On the coldest days of winter, when cold waves from Canada penetrate the US,
local power plants are forced to compete for the same gas with buyers from
Spain or France and sometimes lose this price war.
"The most expensive gas in the world"
The problem is exacerbated by chronic underfunding of
domestic infrastructure. The US finds itself in a paradoxical situation: the
country is literally swimming in gas, but cannot deliver it where it is needed.
The situation in New England (in the states of Connecticut, Maine,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont) is characteristic. Due
to political decisions and opposition from environmental activists, the
construction of new pipelines to this region has been blocked. As a result,
while in Appalachia (Virginia) gas costs about $4 per MMBtu, in Boston
(Massachusetts) this winter prices are approaching $14. This is the most
expensive fuel not only in America, but in the world.
Market forces have been suppressed by political ones,
leading to the fragmentation of a single market. In fact, there are now two gas
markets in the US: one is export-oriented and highly profitable, the other is
domestic, suffering from shortages and price disparities.
EIA forecasts are discouraging: in 2025, the average price
of gas for power plants will increase by 37%. and for industrial consumers – by
21%. This is a direct blow to the competitiveness of American industry, which
has enjoyed the advantage of cheap energy for the past ten years.
The Coal Renaissance
The most unexpected consequence of "gas inflation"
was the return of coal. What coal industry lobbyists could not achieve, market
prices did. Gas became too expensive for electricity generation, and utilities
began to massively switch to cheaper coal.
Statistics indicate a break in the long-term trend. Reserves
of thermal coal will fall by 17% by the end of the year – it is simply being
burned faster than it can be mined. The consulting company Wood Mackenzie has
already revised its forecasts: if two years ago they expected a 60% drop in
coal-fired power generation by 2032, now the decline is estimated at only 39%.
Chris Wright, the Secretary of Energy appointed by Trump,
openly calls for a halt to the decommissioning of coal-fired power plants.
"Energy sobriety has returned to Washington," he said, meaning that
the ideological tenets of the "green transition" are giving way to
the threat of blackouts. The boom in artificial intelligence and data centers –
technologies of the future – that has unfolded in recent years will be powered
by burning the dirtiest fuel of the past, because there is not enough gas for
everyone.
Drilling Can't Keep Up with Demand
The fundamental problem of the American market is that the
boom in demand (exports and data centers) is outpacing supply and physical
capabilities for increasing production. Experts at Rapidan Energy Group have
calculated that to meet market demand by the beginning of the next decade, the
US needs to increase production by 566 million cubic meters per day.
But where will these volumes come from? Here, the American
energy sector falls into a trap of its own geology. A significant portion of
the production increase in recent years has been provided by associated gas,
which comes as a "bonus" when extracting oil, primarily in the
Permian Basin. In 2024, the production of such gas increased by 6%, to 524
million cubic meters per day, providing 37% of all gas production in key
regions. In the Permian Basin, this share reaches as high as 47%.
However, associated gas is a hostage to oil prices. It is
only produced when it is profitable to drill for oil. Now, when world prices
for black gold are under pressure and far from triple-digit values, oil
companies are not in a hurry to aggressively drill new wells. And without new
oil, there is no increase in cheap associated gas.
Hopes for purely gas fields, such as Haynesville or
Marcellus, run into economic barriers. Haynesville consists of deep, hot
formations with high production costs. Rapidan analysts predict that
"sources of cheap gas are unlikely to provide the growth needed to meet
demand." The era of gas at $2.5 per MMBtu may soon be a thing of the past.
A cloudy future
In the case of the US, a kind of resource curse in reverse
has occurred. In trying to become a global guarantor of energy security for its
allies and simultaneously feed the voracious AI sector, the US has strained its
own energy balance. The outlook for 2026–2030 looks challenging. LNG export
capacity on the Gulf Coast will double, siphoning even more resources from the
domestic market. Forward curves show that prices at the Henry Hub could rise
above $5 per MMBtu and stay there for a long time.
For Europe, this means that American LNG will be available,
but at exorbitant prices. American voters, in turn, will receive a cold shower
(perhaps literally) in the form of higher utility bills. And for the global
market, this is a signal that the era of cheap American energy, which for many
years kept world prices in check, is nearing its end. Market balancing will now
occur not through the flexibility of shale producers, but through demand
destruction and a return to coal.”
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą