Sekėjai

Ieškoti šiame dienoraštyje

2021 m. gegužės 21 d., penktadienis

Do Psychologists Cause 'Mental Illness'?


"President Biden's education plan proposes to double the number of psychologists in U.S. schools. This is partly a response to an apparent crisis in childhood mental health. According to a 2019 study in the Journal of Pediatrics, some 30% of American adolescents with fair or poor physical health have been diagnosed with anxiety, between 13% and 20% with behavior disorders, and almost 15% with mood disorders. The study finds that the reported prevalence of these disorders doubled over the previous decade. According to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study, the number of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in 1999 was 7.6%, and in 2018 it rose to 12.9%; that's an almost 70% increase in 20 years.

The apparent decline in childhood mental health is itself depressing. I suspect, however, that one of the factors driving it is increased diagnosis due precisely to the increasing prevalence of mental-health services. It is one thing to detect diseases with well-established biological bases; early detection of cancer has saved many lives. It is quite another to detect diseases on the basis of a rough group of ill-defined symptoms.

When the DSM-5, the standard manual for psychiatric diagnosis, characterizes ADHD, it does so in a way that doesn't neatly separate any population into those who have it and those who don't. It specifies that a child with ADHD displays "six or more" symptoms of "inattention." Such a child, for instance, may be easily distracted. Psychologists don't, one might remark, diagnose teachers and curriculums as insufficiently interesting to maintain attention. Before you treat a child with powerful stimulants, you might ask whether education would give you six varieties of inattention, too.

The grab bag of supposed symptoms of the disease amounts to a description of the average boy's behavior in the average classroom before the era of school psychology: "often fidgets" or "squirms," "often leaves seat," "often runs about," "often talks excessively." These aren't symptoms of an illness. They are symptoms of being a normal human child.

School psychologists may not themselves prescribe medication but often encourage its use and direct parents to prescribing physicians. The diagnoses provided and medications mobilized by child psychology are devoted largely to getting students to sit quietly and still, goals formerly pursued by the cane or the knuckle-rap. It's a new form of school discipline, one that leaves parents certain that their children are diseased, and that quickly leads the children to the same conclusion about themselves. The line drawn by the DSM-5 between normal or reasonable worry and diagnosable anxiety, or between appropriate sadness and depression, is just as blurry.

I'd like to see the evidence -- which appears thin in a quick survey of the literature -- that more school psychologists lead to less childhood mental illness, even by the half-baked standards of the DSM-5. And I'd like to return to thinking about schools as places to learn history and mathematics rather than as wraparound childhood treatment facilities." [1]


1. Do Psychologists Cause 'Mental Illness'?
Sartwell, Crispin. Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y. [New York, N.Y]21 May 2021: A.13.

 

2021 m. gegužės 19 d., trečiadienis

Why Biden waives sanctions against Nord Stream 2

 "The US president weighed soberly. What is more damaging to the interests of the United States in the end: the pipeline or stress with a reliable ally? The result was probably clear. This is also how you can end an argument - give up. At least that is what US President Joe Biden's decision not to impose any sanctions against Nord Stream 2 AG, the Swiss-based company that is building the gas pipeline of the same name through the Baltic Sea and belongs to the Russian energy company Gazprom, for overriding national security interests. 

 The pipe should be ready in summer and transport natural gas from Russia to Germany. The US government announced to Congress on Wednesday that, as parliament has demanded, it would impose punitive measures on some of the Russian organizations involved in the construction of the pipeline and four special ships. But in practice this will probably not have any noteworthy consequences as long as the umbrella group, which is headed by Putin's friend and former Stasi officer Matthias Warnig, is spared punishment. 

Could Biden have decided otherwise? Yes, but only at a considerable price. Sanctioning Nord Stream 2 AG - in other words: cutting them off and all their business partners from the American financial market - would not only have led to massive upheavals with Moscow, but also brought the conflict with Berlin over the pipeline to a head. The potential harm from sanctions could easily have exceeded the benefits."

Another interpretation is possible. The twists and turns of the Freedom Party in Lithuania so enchanted Landsbergiukas that he forgot that resisting the Russians was the purpose of his life and missed the cause. 


Kodėl Bidenas atsisako sankcijų prieš „Nord Stream 2“

 "JAV prezidentas pasvėrė blaiviai. Kas galų gale labiau kenkia JAV interesams: dujotiekis ar stresas su patikimu sąjungininku? Rezultatas tikriausiai buvo aiškus.  Bent jau taip interpretuojamas JAV prezidento Joe Bideno sprendimas netaikyti jokių sankcijų prieš „Nord Stream 2 AG“, Šveicarijoje įsikūrusią bendrovę, kuri tuo pačiu pavadinimu dujotiekį tiesia per Baltijos jūrą ir priklauso Rusijos energetikos bendrovei „Gazprom“. 

 Vamzdis turėtų būti paruoštas vasarą ir transportuoti gamtines dujas iš Rusijos į Vokietiją. JAV vyriausybė trečiadienį Kongresui paskelbė, kad, kaip pareikalavo parlamentas, taiko baudžiamąsias priemones kai kurioms dujotiekio statyboje dalyvaujančioms Rusijos organizacijoms ir keturiems specialiems laivams. Tačiau praktiškai tai neturės jokių dėmesio vertų pasekmių, kol skėtinei grupei, kuriai vadovauja Putino draugas ir buvęs „Stasi“ pareigūnas Matthiasas Warnigas, neduodama bausmės. Ar Bidenas galėjo nuspręsti kitaip? Taip, bet tik už nemažą kainą. Sankcijų skyrimas „Nord Stream 2 AG“ - kitaip tariant: jų ir visų jų verslo partnerių pašalinimas iš Amerikos finansų rinkos - būtų ne tik sukėlęs didžiulius sujudimus su Maskva, bet ir sukėlęs konfliktą su Berlynu dėl dujotiekio. Galima sankcijų žala galėjo lengvai viršyti naudą“. 

Galima ir kita interpretacija. Laisvės partijos viražai Lietuvoje taip užkerėjo Landsbergiuką, kad jis pamiršo, jog priešintis rusams yra jo gyvenimo tikslas ir pražiopsojo šį reikalą.


Merkel ragina skirti agresyvesnį technologijų finansavimą

 "Pasak kanclerės Angelos Merkel (CDU), moksliniams tyrimams ir inovacijoms Vokietijoje per dažnai tenka kovoti su nereikalingomis kliūtimis, įskaitant sudėtingas finansavimo ir kontrolės struktūras. Be to, Vokietija ir Europa turi užsitikrinti daugiau technologinio suvereniteto, kad galėtų susidoroti su Amerikos . ir Kinijos konkurencija, kad nepatektų į sudėtingas priklausomybes, trečiadienį Merkel perspėjo per 2021 m. vykusį mokslinių tyrimų viršūnių susitikimą su įmonių ir mokslo atstovais. 

 „Jei norime įsitvirtinti su savo Europos socialiniais ir ekonominiais modeliais, pateikdami tvarumo ir ateities, kurioje verta gyventi, idėjas, turime būti novatoriškesni, produktyvesni nei kitose pasaulio vietose ir daugeliu atžvilgių taip pat tapti greitesni," - ji perspėjo. Labai aukštas technologijų finansavimas Kinijoje ir Amerikoje, kur valstybė nukreipia „dideles pinigų sumas“ į inovacijas, kelia mums išvadas: „Mes taip pat turime tai padaryti“. 

 Merkel paaiškino, kad ją jaudina ilgą laiką skeptiškas Vokietijos automobilių gamintojų požiūris į tai, kad reikėtų valdyti savo baterijų elementų gamybą. Tai strategiškai svarbu, kad galėtumėte patys skatinti technologinę plėtrą. Tuo pačiu metu kalbama ir apie suverenitetą, kaip apsaugą nuo priklausomybės tiekimo santykiuose, kuriuos sunku išspręsti kritiniu atveju. 

Atsižvelgdama į šalies inovacijų ir finansavimo kraštovaizdį, A. Merkel teigiamai pabrėžė naujosios „Šuolių inovacijų agentūros“ pavyzdį, kuri turėtų veikti laisviau nei ministerijos ir valdžios institucijos, naudodamos finansavimą. Vyriausybinės agentūros, kurios turėtų nuolat įrodinėti Federalinei audito tarnybai, kad ištekliai buvo naudojami ekonomiškai ir efektyviai, negalėjo prisiimti per daug rizikos. „Tada finansavimas neveiks“, - sakė A. Merkel ir patarė, kad agentūros koncepcija turėtų būti naudojama, dar labiau finansuojant mokslinius tyrimus. 

Ji taip pat pasisakė už paprastesnes kontrolės struktūras: šiandien įmonės, veikiančios visoje šalyje, turėtų bendrauti su 17 duomenų apsaugos institucijų ir iki 51 etikos komitetu dėl naujovės, pranešė A. Merkel. Kontrolė taip pat turi vykti greičiau, - reikalavo ji“. 


Merkel calls for more aggressive technology funding

 "According to German Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU), research and innovation in Germany too often have to struggle with unnecessary obstacles - including cumbersome funding and control structures. In addition, Germany and Europe would have to secure more technological sovereignty in order to face the competition with America and China in order not to get into difficult dependencies, Merkel warned on Wednesday at the research summit in 2021 with representatives from companies and science.

"If we want to assert ourselves with our European social and economic models with our ideas of sustainability and a future worth living in, then we have to be more innovative, more productive than other parts of the world and in many ways also become faster," she warned. 

A very offensive technology funding in China and America, where the state directs "large amounts of money" into innovations, leads us to the conclusion: "We have to do that too." 

 Angela Merkel explained that she was concerned about the skeptical attitude of German car manufacturers to operating their own battery cell production for a long time. This is strategically important in order to be able to drive technological developments ourself. At the same time, it is also about sovereignty as protection against dependencies in the delivery relationships that are difficult to resolve in an emergency. 

With a view to the domestic innovation and funding landscape, Merkel positively highlighted the example of the new “Agency for Leap Innovations”, which is supposed to act more freely than ministries and authorities when using funding. Government agencies that would have to continuously prove to the Federal Audit Office that resources were used economically and effectively could not take too much of the risk. "Then it won't work," said Merkel and advised that the agency concept should be used more for research funding. 

She also advocated simpler control structures: Today, companies operating nationwide would have to deal with 17 data protection authorities and up to 51 ethics committees on the way to an innovation, reported Merkel. That too has to go faster, she demanded." 


Who elected such a Government?

 "Coronavirus in Lithuania: 911 new cases recorded in Lithuania on Tuesday, 9 people died" 

 Rest in peace. 

"Quarantine eases: Government liberates rules for communication and organization of celebrations"  

The Government spits on human deaths and celebrates? Who elected such a Government?  


Kas išrinkote tokią Vyriausybę?

 "Koronavirusas Lietuvoje: antradienį Lietuvoje užfiksuota 911 naujų atvejų, 9 žmonės mirė"

Amžiną atilsį.

"Karantinas švelnėja: Vyriausybė atlaisvino bendravimo, švenčių organizavimo taisykles"

Vyriausybei nusispjauti į žmonių mirtis? Kas išrinkote tokią Vyriausybę?