The main question of Lithuania's "defense" is not about whom we will attack. The main question of Lithuania's "defense" is about how we will defend billions of euros for "defense" from others who are coming to the trough, but are weaker than us

 

"The bear's wanderings through Lithuanian cities and the search for a Russian person who escaped from a transit train were briefly overshadowed by the masterful return home of the Lithuanian propaganda master. On a personal "Spartan" flight - like a President!

 

Initially mocking Lithuania's efforts to bring its compatriots home from Israel on the air of the national broadcaster, Marius Laurinavičius insisted: "We are preparing for evacuation, but not via the route proposed by Lithuania... We are in Israel at the invitation of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs will definitely ensure that we return home safely... At first, I highly praised Lithuania's response to this entire crisis, but unfortunately, what we have now raises questions, to say the least..." Later, this propaganda agent changed his mind and got on a bus with the remaining Lithuanian citizens, and later on a plane.

 

The Lithuanian (and not only) Laurinavičius were asked off the plane. The self-important propagandist accused Gediminas Žiemelis. That's how I imagine the head of a company with a turnover of more than two and a half billion euros following the wanderings of a single propagandist every day. But how outraged the local agents(!), they gathered. After all, you can't leave an important (propaganda) agent abroad! In order not to get lost at the safe Jordanian airport of Aqaba, assistance was organized by the Minister of Foreign Affairs Kęstutis Budrys: “Lithuanian diplomats in Jordan, together with other institutions of the country,” helped him find his way home. K. Budrys and Dovilė Šakalienė’s concern for the Lithuanian (and not only) Laurinavičius was so zealous that they even flew him a “Spartan” to Austria. As if that (influence) agent’s life in Austria was in danger.

 

D. Šakalienė testified that the official “Spartan” for M. Laurinavičius was a “political decision.” For your money. So far, no one, not even D. Šakalienė herself, has named the basis for the legal use of state resources by M. Laurinavičius. It seems that the decision is illegal. You say, a conflict of interest? No, in my opinion, much more serious – abuse (with specific property damage) and (or) excess of authority. If you still have doubts, contact the Ministry of National Defense (MND) to fly you on a “Spartan” from a Spanish or Turkish beach. After all, your vacation should be no less important than a propagandist’s leisure time on an Israeli beach.

 

These Laurinavičiuses have been an essential and invaluable part of our political mechanism since the time of regaining independence. They perform the most important propaganda task – to destroy anyone who asks uncomfortable questions, demands honest decisions, true democracy or prevents the “embezzlement” of government money. Whoever is not with us is against us – their modus operandi. After all, who would be more capable of dividing society by developing propaganda of labels – anti-vaxxers, flat-earthers, vatniks, “Kremlins” – if not local Laurinavičiuses. There is no analysis in their writings. This is propaganda that is harmful to Lithuania, but beneficial to other states, some Lithuanian politicians and parties. These Laurinavičiuses are real agents of foreign interests.

 

But enough about those inexpensive influence agents who have become important. Let's get back to our Šakalienėses. After a chartered "Spartan" flight, D. Šakalienė travels business class to events abroad. Again at your expense. After all, the economical class is not a level for an official of such rank. Upon her return, she decided to dismiss the director of the 2nd operational investigation department of the Ministry of Defense. Simply put, the commander of Lithuanian military intelligence. She dismissed him due to alleged employee complaints, and she is conducting an investigation into those complaints after the dismissal. "There will be no more explanations," the minister dares. Where is the logic here? I will explain. Because what is happening is not just D. Šakalienė's incompetence or emotional turmoil, which manifested itself in her previous activities as the head of the Human Rights Monitoring Institute.

 

The Seimas is considering a draft amendment to the Law on the Use of Polygraphs. According to the new law, every person or contractor supplying goods and services in the field of defense will be available to be put “on the lie detector”, the so-called polygraph, chair. I remind you that billions of euros are already being directed to national defense. This means that suppliers who want to exchange those billions for goods or services will be available to be invited to undergo a polygraph examination. The new draft law on polygraphs states that, “if the conclusion of the examination of a person is negative, the conclusion regarding the threat he poses to state security is made taking into account all available information about the person being examined and his environment, and if this person refuses to undergo a polygraph examination, the conclusion is made that this person may pose a threat to state security.” In other words, a polygraph examination becomes essential evidence on the basis of which a conclusion is made as to whether or not a person poses a threat to state security.

 

It seems that the polygraph will replace the security certificates used by Dalia Grybauskaitė - only those who have been approved will be allowed to access the money.

 

It is necessary to admit them. There is only one thing missing – who can invite those KAM suppliers and contractors “to the lie detector chair”? And the same KAM II Operational Investigations Department, whose director was just dismissed by D. Šakalienė for no apparent reason. I emphasize that whether to invite or not to the lie detector chair is at the discretion of these officials. “Persons may be investigated…” – the law establishes. Generally speaking, polygraph tests can be performed upon request, and its conclusions or refusal to take a polygraph test will become essential evidence of a person’s loyalty to the state. And what’s more, in courts, a polygraph test is not considered evidence due to its subjective results. In KAM billions – it will be essential.

 

Do you now understand the reason for the dismissal of the Head of Intelligence, who blindly fails to carry out the ordered orders? There is a fight over defense billions. And this is what D. Šakalienė, who flies in business class, who has turned the military "Spartan" into a charter with "political decisions" and is unable to even explain her decisions honestly, has been tasked with doing. There is no other way to call it a lack of personnel. And what about the propagandists with whom I started this article? I have no doubt that propagandist research and labels will now pour in like a cornucopia. The Laurinavičius family has already been given the task of helping to "redistribute" national defense billions to “good” people.”