Atea advertisement
"A properly functioning, tidy, secure, and advanced IT
infrastructure is important for every private or public sector organization.
However, not all organizations can
have internal IT teams that maintain the infrastructure, improve it, and
promptly resolve emerging problems.
In such cases, IT maintenance
services are purchased from external service providers.
But how to choose a reliable supplier and ensure that the
services provided are of high quality? Tomaš Jankovski, Head of the Service
Department at Atea, based on many years of experience, reveals the most common
mistakes organizations make and shares insights.
Technical procurement requirements are just a starting point
A significant number of organizations believe that in order
to purchase high-quality IT infrastructure maintenance services, it is enough
to prepare a well-prepared technical procurement specification. “Properly
prepared, well-thought-out technical requirements are, of course, important.
However, this is only one part of the whole puzzle, the starting point of the
journey. Even a perfectly prepared specification is useful only until the
moment of signing the contract,” claims T. Jankovski.
Why? According to the expert, what is written on paper does
not necessarily become reality. “The real work begins after the contract is
signed, when it is necessary to ensure that the requirements are actually
implemented,” he emphasizes. This is not always possible: there are cases when
the buyer wants high-quality, promptly provided services, but chooses the
supplier only based on the lowest price and does not leave the opportunity for
suppliers to compete on competence.
Digital workplace maintenance – for 3 euros per month?
Inadequate expectations regarding the price-quality ratio
are also one of the most common problems. “Unfortunately, organizations’
procurement documents still contain truly surprising requirements.
For example, an organization expects
that the maintenance of one digital workstation will cost no more than 3 euros
per month, the hourly rate of an IT engineer will not exceed 8 euros, and that
of a systems administrator – 12 euros,” the Atea representative cites specific
cases.
At the same time, organizations
expect that high-quality and operational IT infrastructure maintenance services
will be provided for such and similar rates. For example, if a need arises, an
IT service provider will respond within 15 minutes, solve the problem within
two hours, and provide services 24/7.
“If you are even slightly knowledgeable in the IT market and
know the salary ranges of IT specialists, it is easy to understand that these
are inadequate expectations. Then the question arises, do you really want to entrust
the management of your organization’s IT economy and access to important
systems to people who will work relying only on Google or ChatGPT?”, – asks T.
Jankovski rhetorically.
He adds that high-quality and security-compliant IT
infrastructure maintenance is not only in the interest of business or public
sector organization managers. “As citizens and users of public digital
services, especially in these times of geopolitical instability, we also
rightly want state organizations and businesses providing important services to
choose competent and reliable IT service providers,” – claims T. Jankovski.
If the quality disappoints – do not be silent
Another common mistake of organizations is paying too little
attention to ensuring the quality of services after the contract is signed.
T. Jankovski notes that organizations
usually check invoices very carefully, but miss other important aspects that
determine the quality of services. For example, such important things as:
service level agreements, control of performance indicators or meetings for
continuous service improvement often remain without due attention.
According to the expert, service quality monitoring must
become an integral part of IT infrastructure maintenance service management.
Organizations that regularly analyze service indicators and actively
communicate with suppliers are able to notice disruptions faster, prevent major
problems and get more value for the same budget.
“I recommend indicating to potential suppliers in advance
that your organization will be particularly concerned about the quality of
services.
In the purchase requirements, and
later in the contract, describe the responsibility of the service provider and
sanctions if the quality is not ensured.
Of course, it is no less important to practically control
the quality of the service provided and monitor various indicators,” emphasizes
the head of the Atea service department.
Finally, if you notice that there is a deviation from the
quality parameters and there is no response to the requirements to ensure them,
this should not be tolerated. At a time when the activities of many
organizations are based on IT infrastructure, an improperly managed IT economy
can lead to interruptions in operations or lost data, which, in turn, would
mean financial losses, customer dissatisfaction or damage to reputation. In the
face of modern cyber threats, the risk increases even more.
“Therefore, stop the provision of services, talk, and in
extreme cases, simply terminate the contract if the quality of the services
does not meet the agreement. This is the only way we can get out of this
vicious circle, when service providers offer extremely cheap services,
committing to provide them with quality, but do not fulfill the latter promise.
In such a case, each party to the transaction would likely receive an important
lesson,” advises T. Jankovski.
The expert summarizes that only a demanding client can have
a strong IT service provider, and only then will these services create value,
and every euro spent will pay off.”
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą