"I suspect most of you already do
many things to help preserve the viability of the planet we all call home.
Perhaps you recycle glass, plastic and paper and compost organic waste;
shop with reusable bags; rely heavily on public transportation or bicycles or,
failing that, at least drive fuel-efficient cars.
But have you given serious thought
to the planetary effects of what you eat and made changes that will protect not
only terra firma and surrounding waters but also your health and the well-being
of generations to come?
In January, The New York Times described a comprehensive
new report from the EAT-Lancet Commission on Food, Planet and Health.
It was compiled by 37 scientists and other experts from 16 countries, with the
aim of establishing a global food economy that could combat chronic diseases in
wealthy nations like ours and provide better nutrition for poor ones, all
without destroying the planet. The scientists’ goal was to outline a healthy
sustainable diet that could feed the nearly 10 billion people expected to
inhabit the world by 2050.
For more than a century, most
Americans have been eating far too high on the hog for the sake of their own
health and the health of the planet. In 1900, two-thirds of our protein came
not from animals but from plant foods. By 1985, that statistic was reversed,
with more than two-thirds of our protein coming from animals, primarily beef
cattle. They consume up to eight pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat
and release tons of greenhouse gases in the process while their saturated fat
and calories contribute heavily to our high rates of chronic diseases.
As Dr. Walter C. Willett, professor
of epidemiology and nutrition at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
and a contributor to the Lancet report told Nutrition Action Healthletter, “We
simply cannot eat the amounts of beef that we’re now consuming and still have a
future for our grandchildren.”
In an editorial, The Lancet
wrote: “Intensive meat production is on an unstoppable trajectory
comprising the single greatest contributor to climate change. Humanity’s
dominant diets are not good for us, and they are not good for the planet.”
The Lancet report does not insist
that everyone become a vegetarian or vegan, but does set as a goal that people
in wealthy countries limit consumption of red meat — beef and lamb in
particular — to one 3-ounce (85 g) serving a week, or one 6-ounce serving every
two weeks. You can be somewhat more generous with pork, poultry and fish, which
are better for your health and less damaging to the earth. The grain-to-meat
ratio for poultry and hogs is only about 2.5 to 1, and the fat in fish is
mostly unsaturated and high in omega-3 fatty acids.
But you would do best for your
health and the planet by gradually adopting a diet that derives most of its
protein from plants — including legumes and nuts — with farmed seafood as your
primary animal food along with moderate amounts of poultry and eggs.
The fact is, we don’t need nearly as much
protein as most Americans now consume. Studies in both animals and people have
shown that high-protein diets limit longevity.
Chickpeas and lentils account for a
large percentage of the protein in my current diet, which has gradually become
heavily plant-based. A favorite recipe starts with 2 cups of cubed butternut
squash and 1 cup of coarsely chopped onion tossed with 1 tablespoon of olive
oil, roasted on a sheet pan at 450 degrees for 20 minutes. Combine this with a
15-ounce can of drained chickpeas tossed with 2 teaspoons of curry powder, ¼
teaspoon coarse salt and 1 tablespoon olive oil that has been roasted
separately on a sheet pan for 15 minutes. Yum! For more ideas, check out Menus of Change 2018
conference recipes.
I often have what some may consider
an unusual breakfast — soup laden with baby spinach and/or kale and roasted
baby carrots, and a salad supper with salmon, tuna, low-fat chicken sausage,
beans or chickpeas for protein. An alternate breakfast consists of slices of
banana topped with peanut butter. Hummus on whole-wheat bread or crackers with
grape tomatoes is a favorite lunch or snack.
Another critically important change
is in our consumption of carbohydrates, nearly half of which come in the form
of nutrition-deficient unhealthy carbs: mostly refined starches like white
bread and white rice, added sugars and potatoes, all of which contribute to the
rampant incidence of obesity and Type 2 diabetes in this country.
Nearly all my carbohydrates come
from beans, whole-grain breads and milk, and I’m gradually decreasing
consumption of my favorite treat: low-fat ice cream.
As Dr. Willett pointed out,
“Switching from refined starches to whole grains doesn’t make a big difference
to the environment, but it does for your health.”
My biggest failing vis-à-vis the
EAT-Lancet dietary advice is the amount of dairy products — primarily nonfat,
lactose-free milk and nonfat yogurt — I consume. Dr. Willett suggests only one
serving a day while I usually consume three, making dairy a large portion of my
protein and calcium intake.
Suggestions about dietary fats mimic
those you’ve been hearing for years: stick with unsaturated vegetable oils like
olive, canola, soybean and corn oils, but steer clear of palm oil, which is
high in saturated fats and its production is responsible for massive
destruction of tropical rain forests needed to protect both the earth’s climate
and diversity of wildlife. Palm oil is an edible vegetable oil that comes from the small fruits of oil palm trees, the scientific name of the plant is Elaeis guineensis.
Coconut oil is currently
enjoying a moment in dietary fame; even though it is a highly
saturated fat, the particular type of fat in coconut oil gives a greater-than-usual
boost to blood levels of HDL cholesterol, which is considered heart-protective.
Dr. Willett suggests limiting it to occasional use, perhaps for Thai cooking or
(do we dare?) making a pie crust or other baked goods that call for a solid
fat.
The EAT-Lancet Commission emphasized
that its advice to eat more plant-based foods and fewer foods from animals is
“not a question of all or nothing, but rather small changes for a large and
positive impact.” It pointed out that “foods sourced from animals, especially
red meat, have relatively high environmental footprints per serving compared to
other food groups,” which Dr. Willett called “unsustainable.”
But even if environmental issues are
not high on your list of concerns, health should be. As the commission concluded,
“Today, over two billion adults are overweight and obese, and diet-related
noncommunicable diseases including diabetes, cancer and heart diseases are
among the leading causes of global deaths,” risks now being exported worldwide."
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą