Yes, we are on the table of negotiations between the East
and the West on security issues. Every reasonable person agrees, as does Jens
Stoltenberg, that the East has a legitimate need for border security, just like
the West. This fact is discussed all the time by both sides, often without us
knowing about it. It is clear that no one will risk the destruction of New
York, Paris, Washington or Berlin for the sake of Marijampolė, although our
Marijampolė is very beautiful. So much so that all the guarantees for us are
not worth the paper they are written on. Our army is a puppet theater. What to
do? Ireland used to belong to the United Kingdom, like us, Lithuania to Russia.
Now Ireland is neutral, it does not cause many problems for the British.
Lithuania must also be neutral.
That Brits are somehow more “democratic”, than Russians, ask
about it the British girls who were groomed and sexually exploited by
immigrants, tolerated by British elite. If this is democracy, it is not clear,
what despotic government could be.
I did not come up with these negotiations, today they are
widely covered in the Lithuanian press. Here is an example:
“After the Estonian portal “The Baltic Sentinel” accused
former NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg of betraying the Baltic states
and Poland, a lot of noise and discussion arose in Lithuania. It is alleged
that the portal quoted J. Stoltenberg inaccurately, and diplomat Linas
Linkevičius claims that he knows J. Stoltenberg, but does not remember that he
ever informally considered giving us to the Russians as a “buffer zone”.
The outrage arose after “The Baltic Sentinel” published a
review of J. Stoltenberg’s memoirs, which states that in a face-to-face meeting
with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, he, knowing the opposition of
Poland and the Baltic states, proposed that the NATO-Russia Council discuss
Russia’s idea of creating a buffer zone in the border areas “and withdrawing
allied forces to the positions that existed before 1997”.
True, the book does not specifically talk about the
withdrawal of forces.
“I advocated for new meetings of the NATO-Russia Council to
discuss the proposed buffer zones. I knew that countries such as Poland and the
Baltic states were strongly opposed to the creation of such zones, because they
believed that it would make their defense more difficult. However, at the same
time, I knew that NATO and Russia had previously managed to agree on
geographical military restrictions. If this were balanced and reformulated, it
could help reduce tensions,” J. Stoltenberg wrote in his memoirs.
The information is inaccurate, it is dramatized
This was pointed out by communications specialist and author
of the book “Front of Fear” Vytautas Matulevičius.
“Currently, Facebook is red with the news that former NATO
Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg admits in his book “On My Watch” that he
wanted to give the Baltic states and Poland to Russia. This is not true,” he
writes on Facebook.
V. Matulevičius points out that the statement in the book
“to withdraw allied forces to the positions they had before 1997,” although
“The Baltic Sentinel” writes exactly that, is simply not there.
“The truth is that in 2021 the US and Europe tried to
prevent a full-scale conflict by diplomatic means (although the Americans did
not believe in them, Europe wanted it). At the end of 2021, Russia presented an
ultimatum to NATO, which was immediately rejected <...> Mutual
de-escalation and restrictions were proposed.”"
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą