Because due to the failed Landsbergian policy, only the most primitive businesses remained in Lithuania, therefore highly qualified talented people are not needed in Lithuania:
"Foreign and Lithuanian experts note that Lithuania was at a disadvantage primarily due to the fact that after leaving the Soviet economic system, it lost demand for complex electronics, communications, machinery, and other relatively high-tech products therefore, one after another, the largest and most technologically advanced factories ceased operations in Vilnius and other cities, and thousands of highly qualified employees lost their jobs.
According to Z. Norkus, only companies producing furniture, wood, textiles and food products with a much lower technological level, which were able to export part of their products, remained. However, they, like fertilizers, oil products, and power generation companies, were bound by dependence on Russia and other eastern neighbors.
In the first years of economic restructuring, Lithuania was plagued by hyperinflation, the collapse of commercial financial enterprises, and the increase in unemployment. The emigration of skilled workers began (primarily for Russian-speakers to Russia and other CIS countries). According to various estimates, the decline in Lithuania's GDP in 1989-1993 could have reached 40 or even 63 percent.
We will quote excerpts from Z.Norkus' fundamental study about two decades in the Republic of Lithuania. By entering the international market, the country lost the most technologically advanced industry (radio, electronics, computing equipment, research and production complexes), and thus partially deindustrialized. According to the international gradation of production technological levels, Lithuania has moved from the higher to the category of semi-peripheral countries. "By the end of the first decade, most of the companies producing science-intensive products had disappeared, and the country's productive forces had degraded qualitatively."
Only a simple heavy and simple light industry remain in Lithuania.
Land reform has been slow, inconsistent and not transparent, which has plagued the Lithuanian countryside and impoverished thousands of households without jobs and livelihoods. Others - those who remained able to work and did not lose hope of starting farming on new foundations - faced insurmountable financial and technological difficulties. Ten years later, only half of the land was returned to the owners.
Few people took advantage of the opportunity to create modern farms, first of all those who had open the doors of government institutions, who had enough material and financial resources to farm on an area larger than 3 ha.
Assessing the course of the land reform, Adviser to the President of the Republic of Lithuania R. Vilpišauskas wrote: waste and the consequent loss of welfare."
Surviving primitive entities in our economy are able to persist only by not paying employees market-level salaries. Our prices are Western and our salaries are absurdly low. Conclusion - Landsbergiai-ruled Lithuania is not a modern society. If you have any talents needed in the current economy, it is worth for you to emigrate from Lithuania urgently.
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą