"In early 2020, just before the start
of the pandemic, I met a woman who said she practiced “aggressive friendship.”
It takes a lot of her time, but she’s the person who regularly invites friends
over to her house, who organizes events and outings with her friends. What a
fantastic way to live.
I thought of her while reading Robin
Dunbar’s recent book, “Friends.”
If the author’s name means something
to you, it’s probably because of Dunbar’s number. This is his finding that the
maximum number of meaningful relationships most people can have is somewhere
around 150.
How many people are invited to the
average American wedding? About 150. How many people are on an average British
Christmas card list? About 150.
How many people were there in early
human hunter-gatherer communities? About 150.
Dunbar argues that it’s a matter of
cognitive capacity. The average human mind can maintain about 150 stable
relationships at any given moment. These 150 friends are the people you invite
to your big events — the people you feel comfortably altruistic toward.
He also argues that most people have
a circle of roughly 15 closer friends. These are your everyday social
companions — the people you go to dinner and the movies with.
Within that group there’s your most
intimate circle, with roughly five friends. These are the people who are
willing to give you unstinting emotional, physical and financial help in your
time of need.
Dunbar argues that the closeness of
a friendship is influenced by how many things you have in common. “You are
twice as likely to share genes with a friend as you are with any random person
from your local neighborhood,” he writes. People tend to befriend those who
have similar musical tastes, political opinions, professions, worldviews and
senses of humor. You meet a new person. You invest time in getting to know this
person, and you figure out which friendship circle you are going to slot him or
her into.
Time is one crucial element in
friendship. Jeffrey Hall, an expert in the psychology of friendship, studied 112
University of Kansas first years and found that it took about 45 hours of
presence in another person’s company to move from acquaintance to friend. To
move from casual friend to meaningful friend took another 50 hours over a
three-month period, and to move into the inner close friend circle took another
100 hours.
People generally devote a lot more
time to their inner circles than to their outer circles. Dunbar found that over
the course of a month, people devote about eight and a half hours to each of
their five closest friends, and they devote a bit more than two hours a month
(basically a dinner or a lunch) to the next 10 who complete their 15-person
circle. They devote, on average, less than 20 minutes a month to the other 135
people in their larger friend circle.
These are averages. We each have our
own friendship style. Extroverts spend their social energy across more people
and have more but weaker close friendships. Introverts invest in fewer people
but have stronger ties to them.
The other crucial factor in
friendship is social skill, and this is something that, as a society, we don’t
take seriously enough. This has become a passionate conviction for me over the
past decade. Social life is fast, complex and incredibly demanding cognitively.
Americans have only recently begun to teach social and emotional skills in
schools, and there are plenty of reasons to believe that online life erodes
those skills.
But our happiness in life, as well
as our health and fulfillment, is hugely dependent on our ability to be
skillfully understanding of and considerate toward others. A lot of the
bitterness and alienation in our country flows from the fact that our social
skills are inadequate to the complex society we now live in.
The psychologists Michael Argyle and
Monika Henderson identified some of the social actions on which friendships are
based: standing up for friends when they are not around, sharing important news
with them, confiding vulnerabilities with them, providing emotional support
when it’s needed.
A lot of the important skills are
day-to-day communications skills: throwing the conversation back and forth
without interrupting, adding something meaningful to what the other person just
said, telling jokes, reminiscing about the past, anticipating how the other
person might react to your comment so you can frame it in a way that’s most
helpful.
Dunbar and his colleagues Neil
Duncan and Anna Marriott sampled conversations other people were having in
coffee shops and other venues and found that two-thirds of the conversation
time was spent talking about social topics.
Dunbar’s research also suggests that
the average person can expect to have a close relationship break down about
every 2.3 years. That’s roughly 30 relationship breakdowns over an adulthood —
usually over things like lack of care and poor communication.
I find Dunbar’s work fascinating,
though like so much of the social sciences, it focuses on what can be
quantified across populations, so it misses what is particular and unique about
each friendship.
Most of this research was done many
years ago. Reading it in the context of Covid, I often had a sense that I was
glimpsing a lost world. Everything seems so fragile. As we gradually slog back
to normal life, this might be the moment to take a friendship inventory, and to
be aggressively friendly."
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą