A Lithuanian company "Nota bene", affiliated with a Lithuanian ruling Landsbergiai dynasty, is convicted of selling to Lithuanian military simple spoons priced like gold. Now the Lithuanian elite wants to load a debt of tens of billions of euros on our children and grandchildren to sell to our military more of such spoons. It seems that Americans have the same problem. We can learn from Musk and Trump, how to deal with it.
"It is one of Washington's most persistent and challenging problems: The federal government misspends at least $100 billion each year out of its multitrillion-dollar budget. Identifying the wasteful outlays isn't the hardest part; it is actually doing something about it.
Every year, agency reports posted online document billions in improper payments, which include fraud but also underpayments, duplicate payments, payments to ineligible recipients or for ineligible goods or services.
According to the Government Accountability Office, they can also include correctly paid amounts that didn't follow regulations, such as a contract missing a required signature.
Here's what we know:
The top lines
In the most recent fiscal year, which ended in September 2024, the agencies that reported their improper payments identified $149 billion in such outlays, or 3.7% of payments that totaled $4.1 trillion. The reports cover a large chunk of total government spending, which the Congressional Budget Office put at $6.75 trillion last fiscal year.
Last year, more than 90% of improper payments were overpayments.
As far back as 2002, Congress required agencies to estimate and report improper payments each year. The law was strengthened in 2010, 2013 and 2020, on the eve of the pandemic. The estimates come from statistical samples of payments that agencies check in detail, using methods approved by the independent inspector general for each agency.
They include 24 agencies: the cabinet departments and others such as the Social Security Administration, Environmental Protection Agency and National Science Foundation. Some agencies don't have to submit these reports, including the Central Intelligence Agency.
In 2024, the median accuracy rate for payments across 68 programs was 95%, with an overall rate of 96%. Some high-spending programs rank among the biggest sources of improper payments, even with accuracy rates over 94%.
Pandemic boom
Improper payments mushroomed during the Covid-19 pandemic, when Congress, the first Trump administration and the Biden administration pushed out new relief programs and expanded existing ones to cushion the shock. Some required little documentation and had weak fraud protection.
Improper payments have fallen 46% since 2021 but remain above 2019 levels, in part because spending grows with inflation, the economy and the population.
As a share of outlays, improper payments rose from 2.9% in 2019 to 7.1% in 2021 before falling to 3.7% last year.
Agencies have tried to recover some overpayments. In 2024, they targeted $33.5 billion as potentially recoverable and succeeded with about two-thirds -- $22.6 billion, including some from previous years.
Why waste persists
One reason overpayments persist is federal agencies' lack of control over some spending. Agencies frequently cite programs jointly administered with states, such as Medicaid, SNAP, unemployment insurance and highway programs. In those programs, state workers determine payment eligibility based on a mix of federal and state rules. Federal agencies report that they offer training and technical assistance to help states prevent improper payments.
In a related issue, the Social Security Administration says that it must rely on people to report changes in their earnings that can affect eligibility for Supplemental Security Income. It is seeking approval to get that information from payroll-service providers instead as a way to cut overpayments.
Danielle Brian, executive director of the Project on Government Oversight, an independent watchdog group, said one of the largest sources of overspending -- and one of the toughest to grapple with -- is how the government handles contracts. Since the federal government is often the only customer of a certain product or service, such as weapons, it is difficult to know what price to pay.
That "allows for price gouging," Brian said. "If that could get wrestled to the ground, that would have an extraordinary impact on the federal budget." And since big federal contractors have a lot of sway on Capitol Hill, the methodology has proved hard to change.
DOGE comes in
In addition to targeting bloat, President Trump and Elon Musk have put a big emphasis on rooting out fraud. The Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency says it has amassed $55 billion in estimated savings as of Feb. 17 through a combination of fraud detection, contract and lease renegotiations, grant cancellations, asset sales, workforce reductions and regulatory savings. About 20% of those savings come from actions taken on contracts, DOGE said on its website.
DOGE's purported top savings come from the U.S. Agency for International Development, which the Trump administration has gutted. It isn't a big source of improper payments.
The initial actions DOGE has taken could change as it focuses on the government's largest programs, such as healthcare and military spending. Improper payments don't always mean fraud was involved. Agencies tallied $7.2 billion -- or 5% of improper payments -- as court-confirmed fraud in 2024.
Christi Grimm, former inspector general for the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees Medicare and Medicaid, said Trump and DOGE are characterizing improper payments as fraud. Grimm and other inspectors general who were fired last month by Trump are suing the administration, alleging it violated congressional mandates protecting IGs.
A federal judge in a lawsuit over the administration's freeze of federal funds made a similar point in a recent ruling. "The Defendants now plea that they are just trying to root out fraud," U.S. District Judge John McConnell Jr. in Rhode Island wrote. "But the freezes in effect now were a result of the broad categorical order, not a specific finding of possible fraud."
What won't put a big dent in the federal budget? Firing government workers, which so far has been one of the main objectives of DOGE, Brian said.
"The entire cost of the federal workforce is a tiny fraction of the total cost of the federal budget," she said. Legal observers have raised concerns about Musk's efforts to shrink the size of the government, since the power of the purse lies in the hands of Congress.
A spokeswoman for DOGE didn't respond to a request for comment." [1]
Governmental personnel buy those golden spoons. The more personnel, the more such purchases.
1. U.S. News: Government Misspending Is Hard to Tame --- Agencies see billions in improper outlays; challenge lies in what to do about them. Overberg, Paul; Rattner, Nate; Patterson, Scott. Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 21 Feb 2025: A5.
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą