Sekėjai

Ieškoti šiame dienoraštyje

2022 m. kovo 10 d., ketvirtadienis

Top Economist Warns Inflation Here to Stay --- Goodhart sees years of worker shortages


"When the global economy tanked in March 2020, the rate of inflation looked like it was heading to zero. That made it a surprising moment for former U.K. central banker Charles Goodhart to predict that inflation would hit between 5% and 10% in 2021 -- and stay high.

Mr. Goodhart reasoned that a seismic shift was under way in the world economy, one that fiscal stimulus and the post-pandemic recovery would only hasten. A long glut of inexpensive labor that had kept prices and wages down for decades, he said, was giving way to an era of worker shortages, and hence higher prices.

"The coronavirus pandemic will mark the dividing line between the deflationary forces of the last 30 to 40 years and the resurgent inflation of the next two decades," said the 85-year-old economist in an interview. He predicted that inflation in advanced economies will settle at 3% to 4% around the end of 2022 and remain at that level for decades, compared with about 1.5% in the decade before the pandemic.

Mr. Goodhart's theory about how shifting demographics are squeezing the labor force and pushing up prices has drawn the attention of central bankers in the U.S., Europe and China -- and has kicked off plenty of debate about whether he is right. Major central banks including the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank have expressed alarm about inflation's surge and are laying plans to try to squelch it.

His idea is "definitely something that worries central banks," said Willem Buiter, a former central banker at the Bank of England. If Mr. Goodhart's theory is correct, he said, "then they're all behind the curve and should not just be thinking of cutting their balance sheets more rapidly, but doing so and raising rates more rapidly."

Some, including Gita Gopinath, first deputy managing director at the International Monetary Fund, have expressed doubts whether the long-term inflation picture is as dire as Mr. Goodhart thinks. She said declining numbers of workers and rising retirees could instead drive inflation lower, pointing to Japan as an example.

"I don't think that we can draw a very simple conclusion based on one particular line of argument in terms of demographics," she told Mr. Goodhart last year at an annual gathering of central-bank governors, academics and financiers in Europe.

U.S. consumer prices rose at an annual rate of 7.5% in January, a 40-year-high, and data on Thursday are expected to show an increase in February. In the eurozone, inflation in February hit 5.8%, data published last week showed. The operation to protect Donbas is likely to drive inflation higher still as it pushes up global energy, commodity and food prices.

Mr. Goodhart outlined his theory in a book, "The Great Demographic Reversal," co-written with London-based economist Manoj Pradhan and published in September 2020.

He argued that the low inflation since the 1990s wasn't so much the result of astute central-bank policies, but rather the addition of hundreds of millions of inexpensive Chinese and Eastern European workers to the globalized economy, a demographic dividend that pushed down wages and the prices of products they exported to rich countries. Together with new female workers and the large baby-boomer generation, the labor force supplying advanced economies more than doubled between 1991 and 2018.

Now, he said, the working-age population has started shrinking across advanced economies for the first time since World War II, and birthrates have declined as well. China's working-age population is expected to shrink by almost one-fifth over the next 30 years.

As labor becomes more scarce, he maintained, workers will push for higher wages, in turn driving up prices. At the same time, businesses will manufacture and invest more locally to help offset both labor shortages and the nationalist and geopolitical pressures curbing globalized supply chains. That will increase production costs and local workers' bargaining power. Global savings will fall as older people consume more than they produce, spending particularly on healthcare. All that will push up interest rates, he predicted.

Acute labor shortages in the U.S. and Europe this year already have pushed up wages. In China, as the workforce shrinks and fewer rural workers move to cities, labor costs have risen. U.S. manufacturing wages are now less than four times as much as those in China, compared with more than 26 times when China joined the WTO in 2001, according to recent research by investment firm KKR.

"I take the things Charles says very seriously," said Isabel Schnabel, who sits on the European Central Bank's six-member executive board, in an interview last month. "Charles wants to alert us that we shouldn't take for granted that the world ahead of us is going to look the same as it did in the recent past."

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell referenced the book in a speech at the annual gathering of central bankers and other finance experts in Jackson Hole, Wyo., last August. He disagreed with the central premise, saying at the time that high inflation rates would likely prove transitory. More recently, he has stopped referring to inflation as transitory, and the Fed is poised for a series of rate increases this year.

In Germany, labor shortages are so acute that the government is seeking to attract 400,000 skilled foreigners a year. In December 2020, then-Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann cited Mr. Goodhart's ideas to push against the European Central Bank's easy-money policies.

In China, where the workforce is expected to shrink by about 100 million over the next 15 years, senior government officials recently translated Mr. Goodhart's book into Mandarin. The book has had a print run of 50,000 copies in China.

Joe Zhang, a former economist at China's central bank, said he sees evidence of Mr. Goodhart's thesis in the fact that Chinese companies are currently absorbing higher costs and wages by reducing their profit margins. He said he expects them to start increasing export prices soon, and that Chinese companies will need to raise wages further to lure workers back to factories in coastal cities.

At the European Central Bank's rate-setting meeting in December, policy makers discussed whether structural changes such as demographics, the role of China or challenges to globalization could signal a shift toward higher inflation that isn't captured by economic models, echoing the concerns raised by Mr. Goodhart, according to a person familiar with the matter. The ECB declined to comment.

The ECB's chief economist, Philip Lane, said in mid-February that inflation could remain high even after the pandemic is over, pointing to changes in the world economy such as the role of China and aging populations. Until recently he had said that inflation would soon fall back below the ECB's 2% target.

Mr. Goodhart, who in addition to his economics work raises sheep on a farm in Devon, England, studied economic history at Harvard University. He joined the Bank of England in the 1960s as an expert in monetarism, which attributes inflation to an excess amount of money in circulation.

He helped shape Bank of England policy in the early 1980s as Margaret Thatcher implemented monetarist ideas to bring down double-digit inflation. He later joined the bank's newly created Monetary Policy Committee after Tony Blair's government made it independent in 1997. The link between inflation and the amount of money in circulation proved to be unreliable, and the U.K. later abandoned money-supply targets.

Mr. Goodhart's testimony to New Zealand's Parliament in 1989 proved critical in that nation's decision to pioneer inflation targeting, in which the central bank aimed to keep inflation close to an explicit target rate, recalled Donald Brash, the country's central bank governor at the time. That policy of inflation targeting has been adopted by major central banks, including the Fed.

In Hong Kong, Mr. Goodhart helped to establish a peg to the U.S. dollar in 1983 that ended a currency crisis in the former British colony and has been in place for almost four decades.

He also warned of a buildup of leverage in advanced economies ahead of the 2008 global financial crisis, former central bankers recall. He reminded them to monitor risks to financial stability at a time when they weren't focused on such concerns, said Donald Kohn, former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve.

"I can't think of any U.K. Chancellor of the Exchequer who has not been influenced in some ways by the views developed in advance by Charles since the '70s," said Mr. Buiter, the former Bank of England central banker.

The models that central banks have long used to forecast inflation appear to have broken down. The idea that inflation is a function of too much money chasing too few goods has lost favor, as has the idea that low unemployment drives high inflation.

For nine years in a row after 2008, the growth and inflation forecasts for the following year by the IMF and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development were too high, said William White, a former deputy governor of Canada's central bank who once worked under Mr. Goodhart at the Bank of England. "Most thoughtful people would say something is wrong," he said.

In 2015, Mr. Goodhart was working in London with Morgan Stanley's economics team, including his co-author Mr. Pradhan, to understand why aggressive central-bank money printing after the 2008 global financial crisis had failed to drive up inflation.

Mr. Goodhart recalled the 1970s theories that powerful trade unions helped drive up wages and inflation. Later, the power of labor diminished largely because of globalization and competition from China, reducing inflation.

He conjectured that a decline in fertility rates in China and the West could make labor scarce again, giving workers renewed leverage.

Mr. Goodhart's thesis, presented to a meeting of top central-bank officials in 2016, posited that far higher inflation and higher interest rates were in the offing.

The European Central Bank's Ms. Schnabel said Mr. Goodhart's book was initially met with skepticism. "After a long period of very low inflation, many did not expect inflation to come back quickly and forcefully," she said. "Then the unprecedented economic disruption happened, caused by the pandemic, and inflation suddenly returned."

A central criticism of Mr. Goodhart's thesis is that countries with more retirees and fewer workers, such as Japan, have the opposite problem -- very low inflation rates.

Most economists would expect an aging population to lead people and firms to invest less, consume less and innovate less, while also generating a savings glut in government securities, said Adam Posen, a former Bank of England policy maker who now runs the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Mr. Goodhart argued that workers likely won't save enough for their retirement, and that pensioners consume more than they produce, especially with healthcare. The dwindling pool of savings, combined with increased corporate spending to secure supply chains and make up for a lack of workers, will push up interest rates, he predicted.

As for Japan, the country is right next door to China, which has been exporting lower prices to the world for decades, Mr. Goodhart said. And even in Japan, he said, there are some signs that inflation is starting to rise.

Mr. Goodhart predicted that with global debt at record levels and asset prices elevated, central bankers will struggle to tame inflation without forcing a deep recession. A golden era for central bankers is ending, he said, and "life will become a lot harder."" [1]

 

 In a high-inflation environment, life is easier for those who can invest their savings into businesses and keep their investment in form of the goods with ever-rising prices.

 

1. Top Economist Warns Inflation Here to Stay --- Goodhart sees years of worker shortages
Fairless, Tom.
Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y. [New York, N.Y]. 10 Mar 2022: A.1.

 

JAV naujienos: JAV Kongreso komitetas prašo „Amazon“ tyrimo

  „JAV Kongreso komitetas prašo Teisingumo departamento ištirti Amazon.com Inc. ir kai kuriuos jos vadovus dėl, įstatymų leidėjų teigimu, galimai nusikalstamo trukdymo Kongresui.

 

    Kovo 9 d. laišką, kurį peržiūrėjo „The Wall Street Journal“, JAV generaliniam prokurorui Merrickui Garlandui išsiuntė Atstovų Rūmų teismų komiteto nariai demokratai ir respublikonai.

 

    Laiške Sietle įsikūrusi technologijų milžinė kaltinama, atsisakius pateikti informaciją, kurios įstatymų leidėjai siekė vykdydami organizacijos Antimonopolinio pakomitečio tyrimą dėl „Amazon“ konkurencinės praktikos. Laiške teigiama, kad atsisakymas buvo bandymas nuslėpti melą, kurį bendrovė įstatymų leidėjams pasakė apie savo elgesį su išorės pardavėjais savo platformoje.

 

    „Amazon“ atstovė sakė: „Tam nėra jokio faktinio pagrindo, kaip rodo didžiulis informacijos kiekis, kurį suteikėme per kelerius sąžiningo bendradarbiavimo su šiuo tyrimu metus“.

 

    Anksčiau „Amazon“ neigė, kad bendrovė ar jos vadovai suklaidino komitetą, ir teigė, kad vidaus politika draudžia naudoti atskirų pardavėjų duomenis kuriant „Amazon“ produktus. „Amazon“ tiria visus įtarimus, kad politika galėjo būti pažeista, pranešė bendrovė.

 

    Teisingumo departamentas atsisakė komentuoti.

 

    Viso tyrimo metu „Amazon“ ne kartą stengėsi sužlugdyti komiteto pastangas atskleisti tiesą apie „Amazon“ verslo praktiką“, – sakoma Kongreso laiške. „Už tai ji turi būti patraukta atsakomybėn“. Laiške teigiama, kad Teisingumo departamentas įspėjamas apie „galimai nusikalstamą Amazon ir kai kurių jos vadovų elgesį“, nors jame nenurodoma, kurie asmenys.

 

    Šis laiškas padidina įtampą tarp „Amazon“ ir įstatymų leidėjų, kurie atliko 16 mėnesių trukusį antimonopolinį tyrimą dėl jo ir trijų kitų technologijų milžinų: „Apple Inc.“, „Google“ patronuojančios bendrovės „Alphabet Inc.“ ir „Facebook“, dabar žinomos kaip „Meta Platforms Inc.“.

 

    Tyrimo metu buvo parengta 2020 m. spalio mėn. ataskaita, kurioje buvo kritikuojamos visos keturios bendrovės ir kuri paskatino teisės aktų pasiūlymus, kuriais siekiama apriboti jų galią. Tačiau įstatymų leidėjų bendravimas su „Amazon“, pasak susijusių žmonių, buvo ypač ginčų pilnas, o su naujuoju laišku tapo vienintele iš keturių bendrovių, kurias Teismų komiteto nariai apkaltino neteisėtu trukdymu.

 

    Problema kyla dėl „Amazon“ atsakymų į įstatymų leidėjų paklausimus, kaip ji savo platformoje naudoja trečiųjų šalių pardavėjų duomenis, kurdama privačių prekių ženklų produktus ir kaip ji traktuoja šiuos „Amazon“ prekių ženklus savo paieškos rezultatuose.

 

    „Amazon“ vadovai ne kartą sakė Atstovų Rūmų komiteto nariams, duodami parodymus ir rašytinius atsakymus, kad ji nenaudoja atskirų trečiųjų šalių pardavėjų duomenų, kad informuotų apie platų savo prekės ženklų asortimentą, ir neteikia privilegijų savo gaminiams paieškos rezultatuose savo platformoje.

 

    2020 m. balandžio mėn. paskelbtameWSJ žurnalo tyrime nustatyta, kad bendrovės darbuotojai reguliariai naudojo tokius pardavėjo duomenis, kurdami produktus savo prekės ženklams. Vėlesnėse „Reuters“, „Politico“ ir „Markup“ ataskaitose buvo matyti, kad darbuotojai naudoja šiuos duomenis, o „Amazon“ teikia pirmenybę savo produktams paieškos rezultatuose.

 

    Kai 2020 m. liepos mėn. stojo prieš Atstovų Rūmų Antimonopolinį komitetą, „Amazon“ įkūrėjas ir vykdomasis pirmininkas Jeffas Bezosas teigė negalintis garantuoti, kad jos politikos visada buvo laikomasi. Jis sutiko pasidalinti vidinio tyrimo rezultatais.

 

    Komiteto nariai paprašė „Amazon“ pateikti įrodymų, patvirtinančių jos neigimą. Susitikimuose su Kongreso darbuotojais ir rašytiniais parodymais „Amazon“ ar jos advokatai atsisakė pateikti tyrimo ataskaitą ir kitus dokumentus, rašoma laiške ir su šiuo klausimu susipažinusiais žmonėmis.

 

    Spalio mėnesį komiteto nariai išsiuntė laišką „Amazon“ generaliniam direktoriui Andy Jassy, ​​ragindami bendrovę pateikti „pateisinančius įrodymus“, susijusius su privačių prekių ženklų verslo praktika. „Amazon“ atstovaujantys teisininkai susitiko su komiteto teisininkais, tačiau, pasak žmonių, susipažinusių su šiuo klausimu, prašomų įrodymų nepateikė." [1]

1. U.S. News: House Panel Seeks Probe of Amazon
Mattioli, Dana.
Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y. [New York, N.Y]. 10 Mar 2022: A.3.

U.S. News: House Panel Seeks Probe of Amazon


"A U.S. congressional committee is asking the Justice Department to investigate Amazon.com Inc. and some of its executives for what lawmakers say is potentially criminal obstruction of Congress, according to people familiar with the matter and a letter containing the request.

The letter, dated March 9 and viewed by The Wall Street Journal, was sent to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland by Democratic and Republican members of the House Judiciary Committee.

The letter accuses the Seattle-based tech giant of refusing to provide information that lawmakers sought as part of an investigation by the body's Antitrust Subcommittee into Amazon's competitive practices. The letter alleges that the refusal was an attempt to cover up what it calls a lie that the company told lawmakers about its treatment of outside sellers on its platform.

An Amazon spokeswoman said, "There's no factual basis for this, as demonstrated in the huge volume of information we've provided over several years of good-faith cooperation with this investigation."

In the past, Amazon has denied that the company or its executives misled the committee and has said that internal policy prohibits using individual seller data to develop Amazon products. Amazon investigates any allegations that the policy might have been violated, the company has said.

The Justice Department declined to comment.

Throughout the investigation, "Amazon repeatedly endeavored to thwart the Committee's efforts to uncover the truth about Amazon's business practices," the congressional letter says. "For this, it must be held accountable." The letter says it is alerting the Justice Department to "potentially criminal conduct by Amazon and certain of its executives," though it doesn't specify which individuals.

The letter escalates tensions between Amazon and lawmakers who conducted a 16-month antitrust investigation into it and three other tech giants: Apple Inc., Google parent Alphabet Inc. and Facebook, now known as Meta Platforms Inc.

The investigation produced an October 2020 report that criticized all four companies and has fueled legislative proposals aimed at curbing their power. But the lawmakers' interaction with Amazon has been particularly contentious, according to people involved, and the new letter makes it the only one of the four companies that Judiciary Committee members have accused of illegal obstruction.

At issue are Amazon's responses to lawmakers' inquiries about how it uses the data of third-party sellers on its platform when creating private-label products, and how it treats those Amazon brands in its search results.

Amazon executives repeatedly told members of the House committee in testimony and written responses that it doesn't use the data of individual third-party sellers to inform the vast lines of its own brands, and doesn't privilege its own products in the search results on its platform.

A Journal investigation published in April 2020 found the company's employees routinely used such seller data to develop products for its own brands. Subsequent reporting from Reuters, Politico and the Markup showed employees using this data and Amazon preferencing its own products in search results.

When he appeared before the House Antitrust Committee in July 2020, Amazon founder and executive chairman Jeff Bezos said he couldn't guarantee its policy was always followed. He agreed to share results of an internal investigation.

Committee members asked Amazon for evidence to support its denials. In meetings with congressional staff and written testimony, Amazon or its lawyers refused to produce the investigation report and other documents, according to the letter and people familiar with the matter.

In October, committee members sent a letter to Amazon Chief Executive Andy Jassy urging the company to provide "exculpatory evidence" surrounding its private-label business practices. Lawyers representing Amazon met with legal counsel for the committee but didn't produce the requested evidence, according to people familiar with the matter." [1]

1. U.S. News: House Panel Seeks Probe of Amazon
Mattioli, Dana.
Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y. [New York, N.Y]. 10 Mar 2022: A.3.

 

JAV naujienos: per pastarąjį dešimtmetį būsto turtas didele dalimi pateko į pasiturinčių rankas

  „Pastarąjį dešimtmetį klestinti gyvenamojo nekilnojamojo turto rinka praturtino beveik kiekvieną JAV namų savininką, tačiau pelnas daugiausia buvo naudingas turtingiausiems, rodo nauja analizė.

 

    Remiantis Nacionalinės nekilnojamojo turto agentūrų asociacijos trečiadienį paskelbta ataskaita, nuo 2010 iki 2020 metų apie 71% būsto turto padidėjimo gavo dideles pajamas gaunantys namų ūkiai.

 

    Apskritai bendra savininkų naudojamų namų vertė JAV per dešimtmetį išaugo 8,2 trilijono dolerių iki 24,1 trilijono dolerių, pranešė NAR. Turto augimas tęsėsi per pastaruosius dvejus metus, nes būsto kainos augo dėl didelės paklausos ir ribotos pasiūlos.

 

    Būsto vertės skirtumas tarp namų ūkių, uždirbančių daugiau nei 200 % vidutinių savo vietovių pajamų, ir kitų namų savininkų per dešimtmetį labai išaugo. 2010 m. dideles pajamas gaunantiems namų savininkams priklausė 28 % viso JAV būsto turto. Iki 2020 m. šis skaičius išaugo iki 42,6%.

 

    Vidutinių pajamų namų ūkių turimo būsto dalis sumažėjo iki 37,5% 2020 m., nuo 43,8% 2010 m. Mažas pajamas gaunančių būsto turtas sumažėjo iki 19,8% 2020 m., nuo 28,2% 2010 m.

 

    „Tai yra pažadinimo skambutis“, – sakė vyresnysis ekonomistas ir NAR būsto ir komercinių tyrimų direktorius Gay'us Cororatonas. „Politika turi būti labiau orientuota į tai, kad būtų užtikrinta, kad žemesnes pajamas gaunantys ir daug daugiau vidutines pajamas gaunančių žmonių gautų naudos iš namų.

 

    Remiantis Federalinio rezervo vartotojų finansų tyrimo duomenimis, būsto nuosavybė yra kelias, kuriuo galima susikurti gerovę JAV. Pasak First American Financial Corp., visų namų ūkių, išskyrus didžiausias pajamas gaunančius, gyvenamasis plotas sudarė didžiąją dalį bendro turto.

 

    JAV būsto nuosavybės lygis pasiekė aukščiausią tašką – 69,2 % 2004 m., o 2016 m. nukrito žemiau 63 %, nes milijonams namų ūkių buvo atimta nuosavybė arba pasitraukė iš būsto nuosavybės krizės ir nuosmukio metu.

 

    Surašymo biuro duomenimis, praėjusių metų ketvirtąjį ketvirtį jis išaugo iki 65,5%.

 

    Vidutinių ir mažas pajamas gaunančių namų ūkių dalis visame būsto turte sumažėjo 2020 m. pasibaigusį dešimtmetį, nes jie sudarė mažesnę visų namų savininkų dalį, nei 2010 m., teigiama NAR ataskaitoje.

 

    Prieiga prie būsto nuosavybės privalumų tapo nelinksma tiems, kurie dar nėra rinkoje. Per pastaruosius dvejus metus sparčiai augančios būsto kainos lėmė, kad pirmą kartą pirkėjams tapti būsto savininkais tapo brangiau, ypač dėl to, kad pastaraisiais mėnesiais hipotekos palūkanų normos taip pat išaugo." [1]

 

1. U.S. News: Housing Wealth Flowed to Affluent In Past Decade
Friedman, Nicole.
Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y. [New York, N.Y]. 10 Mar 2022: A.3.

U.S. News: Housing Wealth Flowed to Affluent In Past Decade


"The past decade's booming residential real-estate market has enriched almost every U.S. homeowner, but the gains have largely benefited the wealthiest, a new analysis shows.

From 2010 to 2020, about 71% of the increase in housing wealth was gained by high-income households, according to a report released Wednesday by the National Association of Realtors.

Overall, the total value of owner-occupied homes in the U.S. rose $8.2 trillion over the decade to $24.1 trillion, NAR said. Those wealth gains have continued in the past two years, as housing prices have surged because of robust demand and limited supply.

The housing-value gap between households earning more than 200% of their area's median income and other homeowners widened significantly over the decade. In 2010, high-income homeowners held 28% of all U.S. housing wealth. By 2020, that figure rose to 42.6%.

The share of housing wealth held by middle-income households declined to 37.5% in 2020, from 43.8% in 2010. Low-income housing wealth fell to 19.8% in 2020, from 28.2% in 2010.

"It's a wake-up call," said Gay Cororaton, senior economist and director of housing and commercial research at NAR. "Policies have to be focused more on making sure that the lower-income and many more middle-income folks participate in the benefit of homeownership."

Homeownership is a path for building wealth in the U.S. The median homeowner had $254,900 in wealth in 2019, compared with $6,270 for the median renter, according to the Federal Reserve's Survey of Consumer Finances. And for all but the highest-income households, their residential properties accounted for the bulk of their overall wealth, according to First American Financial Corp.

The U.S. homeownership rate peaked at 69.2% in 2004 before sliding below 63% in 2016, as millions of households went through foreclosure or exited homeownership during the housing crash and recession.

It has risen since then to 65.5% in the fourth quarter of last year, according to the Census Bureau.

Middle-income and low-income households' share of total housing wealth declined in the decade ended in 2020 because they made up a smaller proportion of overall homeowners than they did in 2010, the NAR report said.

Accessing the benefits of homeownership has become frustrating for those who aren't already in the market. Fast-rising home prices in the past two years have made it costlier for first-time buyers to become homeowners, especially as mortgage rates have also climbed in recent months." [1]

1. U.S. News: Housing Wealth Flowed to Affluent In Past Decade
Friedman, Nicole.
Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y. [New York, N.Y]. 10 Mar 2022: A.3.

 

Ukrainos krizė: kodėl JAV nepritaria lenkiškų lėktuvų suteikimui Kijevui?

 „Pentagonas trečiadienį ištraukė kištuką iš NATO narių sumanymo aprūpinti Ukrainą sovietų pagamintais koviniais lėktuvais MiG-29.

 

    Ankstesnė parama lėktuvų atgabenimui į Ukrainą kilo po kelias dienas trukusio intensyvaus Kijevo lobizmo dėl tokių orlaivių ir JAV bei Lenkijos ginčų dėl tokio susitarimo. Šis incidentas tapo pirmąja reikšminga įtampa Šiaurės Atlanto sutarties organizacijoje, kai ji teikia paramą Kijevui atremti Rusijos pajėgas.

 

    Gynybos sekretorius Lloydas Austinas trečiadienį kalbėjosi su savo Lenkijos kolega ir „pabrėžė, kad šiuo metu nepritariame papildomų naikintuvų perdavimui Kijevo oro pajėgoms“, sakė Pentagono spaudos sekretorius Johnas Kirby.

 

    Pentagonas taip pasielgė, praėjus dienai po to, kai Lenkija pribloškė Vašingtoną, sakydama, kad savo sovietų pagamintus kovinius lėktuvus MiG-29 galės gauti JAV, o ne Ukraina. Lenkija pasiūlė, kad lėktuvai pirmiausia nuskristų šimtus mylių kita kryptimi iki Ramstein oro bazės Vokietijoje.

 

    Idėja Vašingtoną nustebino. „Nereikalaujama būti kariniu ekspertu, kad suprasti, kodėl lėktuvams skristi iš JAV oro bazės į ginčijamą šalies dalį, kurioje vyksta karas, nėra mūsų ir NATO interesų labui“, – sakė Baltųjų rūmų atstovė Jen Psaki, spaudos sekretorė.

 

    J. Kirby pavadino pasiūlymą „didelė rizika“ ir teigė, kad jis „nepakeis Kijevo oro pajėgų efektyvumo, palyginti su Rusijos pajėgumais“.

 

    Ginčas tarp dviejų artimų NATO sąjungininkų kilo, kai viceprezidentė Kamala Harris vyksta į Lenkiją. Darbotvarkėje: „Kaip geriausia suteikti įvairią saugumo pagalbą Ukrainai“, – sakė aukšto rango administracijos pareigūnas.

 

    Nuo tada, kai prasidėjo Rusijos operacija, skirta apsaugoti Donbasą, NATO, siekdama padėti Kijevui atremti Rusijos pajėgas, teikė ginklus kaimyninei šaliai ir teikė pastiprinimą į Aljanso rytinį frontą, kad apsaugotų ten esančius sąjungininkus, iš esmės veikė kartu. Ir NATO pradeda klausytis ilgalaikių Lenkijos ir kitų Vidurio Europos narių prašymų nuolat bazuoti karius, kad sustiprintų gynybą.

 

    Lėktuvų problema iškilo po to, kai Kijevo pareigūnai kelias savaites prašė Vakarų šalių tiekti jiems ginklus. Kovinių lėktuvų teikimo idėja, kaip aukščiausio lygio ginklų perdavimas iš Vakarų į Ukrainą, prasidėjo, kaip žemo lygio diskusijos tarp Europos kariškių. Tai iškilo į viešumą, kai Europos Sąjungos užsienio politikos vadovas Josepas Borrellas prieš 10 dienų trumpai užsiminė apie tuos pokalbius viešai. „Mes ketiname tiekti ginklus ir net naikintuvus“, – sakė jis.

 

    Tuo metu techninės diskusijos vyko, tačiau turėjo būti diskretiškos, sakė Lenkijos pareigūnai. Pareigūnai aiškinosi, ar lėktuvai galėtų būti kaip nors slapta pergabenti per jos rytinę sieną į Ukrainą, kad būtų išvengta galimybės išprovokuoti platesnį karą, galintį tiesiogiai įtraukti NATO.

 

    Kai kuriems ši idėja visada buvo nereali. „NATO reaktyvinį lėktuvą paversti tokiu, kuriuo galėtų skristi ukrainiečiai, reikštų labai sudėtingų sistemų išplėšimą“, – sakė vienas JAV gynybos pramonės pareigūnas Lenkijoje. Varšuva atnaujino savo MiG sistemomis, kad sąjungininkai galėtų atpažinti lėktuvus, kaip draugiškus ir saugiai bendrauti, sakė jis ir pažymėjo, kad dalis šios įrangos nėra perkeliama už aljanso ribų ir turės būti pašalinta iš lėktuvų, prieš perduodant juos ukrainiečiams. .

 

    „Jei būtų planas tai padaryti, tai būtų bent kelių mėnesių projektas, net ir veikiantis fantastiniu greičiu“, – sakė jis.

 

    Tikėtina, kad ukrainiečių pilotai galėtų palyginti greitai prisitaikyti prie lenkų lėktuvų, bet tai nereiškia, kad jie būtų pakankamai įgudę, kad galėtų skraidyti su MiG į karą, sakė Londono ekspertų centro „Royal United Services Institute“ mokslinis bendradarbis Justinas Bronkas.

 

    NATO narės Lenkija, Bulgarija ir Slovakija eksploatuoja Ukrainos pilotams žinomus lėktuvus MiG-29. Tik Lenkija rimtai svarstė dovanoti savo MiG.

 

    Pagrindinis Lenkijos susirūpinimas: ji nenorėjo būti vertinama, kaip vienašališkai dovanojanti savo lėktuvus, o norėjo, kad JAV ir NATO pritartų šiam žingsniui. Tai apsaugotų Lenkiją nuo istorinės varžovės, kitos slavų šalies, Rusijos, keršto." [1]

 

Lietuvos valdžiai tokių rūpesčių nėra: mes čia, pirmyn, sumuškite mus. Tik nedidelė problema: mes neturime naikintuvų.

 

1. The Ukraine Crisis: U.S. Opposes Giving Kyiv Polish Aircraft

Wall, Robert; Youssef, Nancy A; Hinshaw, Drew.
Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y. [New York, N.Y]. 10 Mar 2022: A.10.

The Ukraine Crisis: Why Does U.S. Oppose Giving Kyiv Polish Aircraft?


"The Pentagon on Wednesday pulled the plug on the idea of NATO members providing Soviet-built MiG-29 combat jets to Ukraine.

The about-face from earlier support of getting planes to Ukraine came after days of intense lobbying by Ukraine for such aircraft and a spat between the U.S. and Poland about how such a deal might unfold. The incident marked the first significant tension within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as it provides support to Ukraine to fend off Russian forces.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin spoke to his Polish counterpart Wednesday, and "stressed we do not support the transfer of additional fighter aircraft to the Ukrainian Air Force at this time," said Pentagon press secretary John Kirby.

The Pentagon's move came a day after Poland stunned Washington when it said it would make its Soviet-built MiG-29 combat jets available, though to the U.S., and not directly to Ukraine. Poland suggested the planes first go hundreds of miles in the other direction to the Ramstein Air Base in Germany.

The idea caught Washington by surprise. "It doesn't require a military expert to understand why having planes fly from a U.S. air base into a contested part of a country where there is a war is not in our interest and not in NATO interests," said Jen Psaki, White House press secretary.

Mr. Kirby called the proposal "high risk," and said it wouldn't "significantly change the effectiveness of the Ukrainian Air Force relative to Russian capabilities."

The spat between two close NATO allies comes as Vice President Kamala Harris heads to Poland. On the agenda: "How best to provide a variety of security assistance to Ukraine," said a senior administration official.

Since Russia's operation to protect Donbas began, NATO otherwise has largely operated in lockstep to help Ukraine fend off Russian forces, delivering weapons to the neighboring country and running reinforcement to the alliance's eastern front to protect allies there. And NATO is starting to listen to longstanding requests from Poland and other Central European members to permanently base troops there to reinforce defenses.

The issue of the planes surfaced after Ukrainian officials for weeks pleaded with Western countries to supply them weapons. Providing combat planes in what would be the highest profile transfer of arms from the West to Ukraine began as a low-level point of discussion among European militaries. It blew into the open when European Union foreign-policy chief Josep Borrell 10 days ago made a passing reference to those conversations in public. "We are going to supply arms and even fighter jets," he said.

At that point, technical discussions were ongoing, but meant to be discreet, Polish officials said. Officials were looking at whether the planes could be somehow transported across its eastern border into Ukraine, surreptitiously, to avoid the possibility of provoking a wider war that could directly involve NATO.

To some the idea was always a nonstarter. "Turning a NATO jet into something Ukrainians could fly would mean ripping out hugely complicated systems," said a U.S. defense-industry official in Poland. Warsaw upgraded its MiGs with systems so allies could identify the planes as friendly and to communicate securely, he said, noting that some of that equipment isn't transferred beyond the alliance and would have to be removed from the planes before handing them to the Ukrainians.

"If there were a plan to do so, this would be at least a multi-month project, even operating at warp speed," he said.

Ukrainian pilots likely would be able to adapt to the Polish planes relatively quickly, but that doesn't mean they would be proficient enough to take the MiGs to war, said Justin Bronk, research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, a London think tank.

NATO members Poland, Bulgaria and Slovakia operate MiG-29s, a plane type Ukrainian pilots are familiar with. Only Poland seriously considered donating its MiGs.

Chief among Poland's concerns: It didn't want to be seen as donating its jets unilaterally, but rather wanted U.S. and NATO backing for the move. That would protect it from retaliation by its historical rival, another Slavic country, Russia.” [1]

Lithuanian government has no such concerns: We are here, go ahead, beat us up. Just a small problem: we do not have jets.

1. The Ukraine Crisis: U.S. Opposes Giving Kyiv Polish Aircraft
Wall, Robert; Youssef, Nancy A; Hinshaw, Drew.
Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y. [New York, N.Y]. 10 Mar 2022: A.10.