Sekėjai

Ieškoti šiame dienoraštyje

2024 m. gegužės 22 d., trečiadienis

China Tightens Minerals Grip As West Fails to Make Headway


"SINGAPORE -- For the past few years, the West has been trying to break China's grip on minerals that are critical for defense and green technologies. Despite their efforts, Chinese companies are becoming more dominant.

They are expanding operations, supercharging supply and causing prices to drop. Their challengers can't compete.

"China is not just standing still waiting for us to catch up," said Morgan Bazilian, director of the Payne Institute at the Colorado School of Mines. "They are making investments on top of their already massive investments in all aspects of the critical-minerals supply chain."

Take nickel, which is needed for electric-vehicle batteries. Chinese processing plants that dot the Indonesian archipelago are pumping out vast quantities of the mineral from new and expanding facilities, jolting the market.

Meanwhile, Switzerland-based mining giant Glencore is suspending operations at its nickel plant in New Caledonia, a French territory, concluding it can't survive despite offers of financial help from Paris. The U.K.'s Horizonte Minerals, whose new Brazilian mine was expected to become a major Western source, said in April that investors had bailed, citing oversupply in the market.

At least four nickel mines in Western Australia are winding down.

Lithium projects in the U.S. and Australia have been postponed or suspended after a surge in Chinese production at home and in sub-Saharan Africa.

The only dedicated cobalt mine in the U.S. also suspended operations last year, five months after local dignitaries attended its opening ceremony. Its owners said they are struggling against a flood of Chinese-produced cobalt from Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Last year, non-Chinese production of refined cobalt declined to its lowest level in 15 years, according to Darton Commodities.

The share of lithium mining done within China or by Chinese companies abroad has grown to 35% this year from 14% in 2018, according to Fastmarkets, a commodities-information provider. Over the same time, lithium processing done within China has risen to 70% from 63% in 2018, according to Fastmarkets.

The breakneck expansion has assailed Western producers, who have said China's domestic economy can't always absorb the flood of minerals its firms bring to market. Slower-than-expected electric-car sales growth in China last year meant there were fewer takers for China's mineral surge, contributing to the crash in global prices.

What is more worrying for Western producers is that there is little sign of a letup.

"It's just the way China does things. They have tended to build more capacity whether it's in aluminum, or cement, or nickel," said William Adams, head of base-metals research for Fastmarkets. Chinese companies "all gun for market share, and the consequence for that is you get oversupply."

Western officials, too, are sounding the alarm. In response to a question in April about China's dominance in nickel, Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland of Canada said the market had been flooded, making businesses in free-market democracies uneconomic.

"It is our belief that that behavior can be intentional, can be happening with the purpose of driving companies in our country, in those of our allies, out of business," she said.

China's Foreign Ministry didn't respond to a request for comment.

Chinese companies are continuing to ramp up as a result of years of aggressive acquisitions. Zijin Mining, a Chinese state-backed company, said it would increase lithium production by around 85 times this year from a low base, and by a further five times next year.

The projected growth stems from its 2022 purchase of a Western asset -- a premium untapped mine in Argentina -- that is scheduled to begin pumping out lithium this year.

The mine was discovered in 2015 when Waldo Perez, an Argentinian-born geologist, took samples at a remote lake 13,000 feet above sea level in the Andes, which turned out to be part of a massive lithium deposit. He formed a Canadian company called Neo Lithium with partners, secured the mineral rights, listed it on the Toronto Stock Exchange and stepped up exploration.

By 2021, they decided to sell. The three best offers the company received were from Chinese companies, including the winning $750 million bid from Zijin, whose largest shareholder is a Chinese state-owned firm.

The sale passed a Canadian government review but perturbed conservative lawmakers in the country and in the U.S.

"The Chinese were true believers, but the Westerners were not," Perez said.

China has many advantages in the race to lock up minerals. Its miners are deep-pocketed and aggressive, making bets in resource-rich countries that Western companies have long viewed as corrupt or unstable, such as Indonesia, Mali, Bolivia and Zimbabwe. State banks provide financing for power plants and industrial parks abroad, paving the way for further private Chinese investment.

China's rapid industrial development also means its companies have spent decades fine-tuning the art of turning raw ore into metals. They can set up new facilities quickly and cheaply. A paper published in February by the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies pegs the costs of building a lithium refinery outside China as three to four times higher than building one within the country.

In eastern Indonesia, Chinese companies have built a fleet of highly efficient nickel and cobalt plants over the past few years after mastering a technology Western miners long considered glitchy and expensive. The plants run on coal power, some of it new, as the world is looking to phase out dirty energy.

"It's just a simple, straightforward engineering capability that the Chinese have that has been lost in the rest of the world," said Jim Lennon, managing director for commodities strategy at Macquarie, an Australian bank. "The Chinese have this overwhelming competitive advantage now that can't really be addressed."

Talon Metals is trying to compete. The company, based in Toronto, controls a rich underground nickel reserve in central Minnesota -- a mine the White House said is part of its plan for breaking U.S. mineral dependence on China. The Energy Department has earmarked more than $100 million for Talon to build a refinery in North Dakota to process ore from Minnesota and elsewhere in North America.

Tesla agreed to buy the nickel for car batteries.

"U.S. policymakers on both sides of the aisle realize we cannot allow China to become a 'single-member OPEC' for critical minerals like nickel," Sean Werger, Talon's president, said in April, referring to the oil cartel formed by many of the world's top producers to coordinate supply.

But some investors have soured on Talon, whose share price on the Toronto Stock Exchange has dropped around two-thirds over the past two years amid a flood of Chinese nickel from Indonesia. Many analysts said projects outside Indonesia will struggle to take off unless nickel prices rise significantly. Talon said its high-quality ore gives it an edge, that it is using innovative technologies to boost revenue, and that there is still demand for U.S.-mined minerals.

Talon said it isn't a fair fight. Chinese nickel companies receive cheap state financing as part of a "strategic imperative to gain control over pricing," said Todd Malan, Talon's director of external affairs. "All the Western projects have to meet market-based economic criteria."

The mineral industry is a national priority for Beijing. Metals and mining investments under its Belt and Road Initiative hit record levels last year, according to a report by Australia's Griffith Asia Institute. Chinese official lending for minerals projects in developing countries typically offers lower rates than commercial loans, according to AidData, a university research lab at William & Mary in Virginia.

Meanwhile, Western companies struggle to get loans. Amos Hochstein, a top White House energy adviser, said this month that Western banks are reluctant to finance projects in risky mineral-rich countries and that China is often the only player.

U.S. legislation passed in 2022 offers electric-vehicle manufacturers incentives to buy minerals domestically or from countries with whom the U.S. has free-trade agreements.

Starting next year, batteries could be disqualified for subsidies if they contain minerals that are mined or processed by Chinese companies.

Last Tuesday, the White House announced new tariffs on China, including on critical minerals such as natural graphite that Beijing dominates.

Western miners are hopeful that these provisions will eventually drive demand for their minerals, though some are concerned carmakers could find workarounds. They also hope Chinese companies will dial down production.

"At today's prices, the economics for new greenfield projects, particularly in the West are not supported," Kent Masters, chief executive of Albemarle, the largest U.S. lithium producer, said this year. Unless prices rise, Masters has said he doesn't think there is a "business case" for a complete Western lithium supply chain." [1]

Scary. China will build a modern clean economy for the whole world and we will be left here to resent it. How can that be? We were for saving the world from global climate catastrophe as soon as possible. Now just look at us...

1. China Tightens Minerals Grip As West Fails to Make Headway. Emont, Jon.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 22 May 2024: A.1.

2024 m. gegužės 21 d., antradienis

Kaip JAV praranda Afriką Putino Rusijos naudai

  „Walterio Russello Meado straipsnyje „Kodėl Putinas siekia dominuoti Afrikoje“ (gegužės 14 d.) teigiama, kad Vladimiro Putino sėkmę Afrikoje iš dalies lėmė tai, kad Amerika per daug dėmesio skiria demokratijos ir žmogaus teisių rėmimui, o nepakankamai saugumo partnerystei. Įrodymai rodo, kad atvirkščiai.

 

     JAV išlaidos pagalbos saugumui Afrikoje sumažina asignavimus demokratijai. Pranešama, kad 2017–2018 m. JAV išleido 110 milijonų dolerių JAV dronų bazei Nigeryje pastatyti. Tačiau 2020 m. JAV išleido tik 3,8 mln. dolerių demokratijai, valdymui ir žmogaus teisėms Nigeryje stiprinti.

 

     Tas pats skirtumas galioja ir platesniam žemynui. 2022 fiskaliniais metais JAV išleido 49 % daugiau paramos taikai ir saugumui (neįskaitant Pentagono 10 antraštinės dalies lėšų, skirtų rengti ir aprūpinti priimančiosios šalies pajėgas, o tai padidėtų kelis kartus), nei demokratijai ir žmogaus teisėms stiprinti. Tik 33 mln. dolerių buvo skirta politinei konkurencijai skatinti per stipresnes demokratines institucijas ir 21,6 mln. dolerių žmogaus teisių apsaugai.

 

     JAV politika nesugebėjo sutrukdyti Kremliaus ekspansijai būtent dėl to, kad ji per daug dėmesio skyrė artimiausio laikotarpio saugumo laimėjimams. Dėl tvirtų demokratinių institucijų ir gyvybingos pilietinės visuomenės Rusijai sunku daryti įtaką ir pasirinkti elitą. Manevruojanti demokratija atvėrė duris V. Putinui Afrikoje.

     Patrikas Kvirkas

     Tarptautinis respublikonų institutas

     Bethesda, Md.

     P. Quirk 2018–2019 m. dirbo valstybės sekretoriaus politikos planavimo štabe.“ [1]

 

Kurį laiką Amerikos idėjos veikė. Amerikiečiai padidino Afrikos kariuomenės galią, kad galėtų atsverti ir kontroliuoti Afrikos elitą. Iškilo netikėta komplikacija – stiprūs Afrikos kariškiai perversmuose pradėjo periminėti valdžią ir patys tapo elitu. Siekdami išvengti šio ciklo pasikartojimo ir atsverti Ameriką, Afrikos kariuomenė pradėjo draugautisu rusais. Dabar Vakarų kariniai objektai išstumiami iš Afrikos žemės.

1. How the U.S. Loses Africa to Putin's Russia. Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 21 May 2024: A.16.

How the U.S. Loses Africa to Putin's Russia

"Walter Russell Mead's "Why Putin Seeks to Dominate Africa" (May 14) asserts that Vladimir Putin's success in Africa is due in part to America's focusing too much on supporting democracy and human rights and not enough on security partnerships. Evidence shows that the inverse is true.

U.S. security-assistance spending in Africa dwarfs allocations for democracy. In 2017-18, the U.S. reportedly spent $110 million to build a base for U.S. drones in Niger. Yet in 2020, the U.S. spent a mere $3.8 million to strengthen democracy, governance and human rights in Niger. 

The same disparity applies for the broader continent. In fiscal year 2022, the U.S. spent 49% more on peace and security assistance (excluding Pentagon Title 10 funds to train and equip host-nation forces, which would increase the figure several times over) than it did to strengthen democracy and human rights. Only $33 million went to promoting political competition via stronger democratic institutions and $21.6 million on protecting human rights.

U.S. policy has failed to thwart Kremlin and Chinese expansion precisely because it has focused too much on near-term security gains. Robust democratic institutions and vibrant civil society make it difficult for China and Russia to exert influence and co-opt elites. Shunting democracy has opened the door to Mr. Putin in Africa.

Patrick Quirk

International Republican Institute

Bethesda, Md.

Mr. Quirk served on the secretary of state's policy planning staff, 2018-19." [1]

For some time America's ideas worked. Americans increased the power of  Africa's military in order to keep Africa's elites in control. Unexpected complication showed up - strong African military started taking power in coups and becoming elite themselves. To avoid repetition of this cycle and to counterbalance America, African military started cozying up to Russians. Now Western military facilities are being kicked out from Africa's soil.

1. How the U.S. Loses Africa to Putin's Russia. Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 21 May 2024: A.16.

 

Amerikietė Yellen atmeta pasaulinį mokestį milijardieriams

„FRANKFURTAS – JAV nepritaria siūlomam pasauliniam turto mokesčiui milijardieriams, pareiškė iždo sekretorė Janet Yellen, atmesdama Brazilijos, Prancūzijos ir kitų šalių idėją pastūmėti ekonomikos svarstykles nuo megaturčių naudos.

 

     Šiais metais atėjo Brazilijos eilė vadovauti 20 didžiausių ekonomikų grupei, o šalis paragino grupę sukurti suderintą metodą, kaip apmokestinti itin turtingus asmenis, kurie gali perkelti jų pinigus į žemų mokesčių jurisdikciją. Tikslas yra atspindėti pasaulinį minimalų mokestį korporacijoms, kurį 2021 m. pasirašė maždaug 140 šalių, tačiau nuo to laiko susidūrė su kliūtimis JAV ir kitur.

 

     Yellen sakė, kad JAV nepalaikys derybų šiuo klausimu. Šią savaitę ji susitiks su Septynių pažangių demokratijų grupės finansų ministrais, kurie turėtų aptarti pasaulinį turto mokestį.

 

     "Mes tikime progresiniu apmokestinimu. Tačiau samprata apie kažkokį bendrą pasaulinį susitarimą dėl milijardierių apmokestinimo, tam tikru būdu perskirstant pajamas, – mes nepritariame procesui, kuriuo bandoma tai pasiekti. Tai yra kažkas, ko negalime pasirašyti, " - ji pasakė.

 

     Kartu su ministrais iš Brazilijos ir Prancūzijos, Ispanijos, Vokietijos ir Pietų Afrikos pareigūnai aptarė planą, pagal kurį milijardieriai kasmet turėtų mokėti mokesčius, kurių vertė būtų bent 2% viso jų turto." [1]


 

Problema dar negalutinai aiški. Pažiūrėsime, ką apie tai nuspręs Trumpas. Laukti liko visai nedaug.


1. U.S. News: Yellen Rejects Global Tax on Billionaires. Duehren, Andrew.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 21 May 2024: A.2.

America's Yellen Rejects Global Tax on Billionaires


"FRANKFURT -- The U.S. opposes a proposed global wealth tax on billionaires, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said, rejecting an idea floated by Brazil, France and other nations to tip the economic scales away from the megarich.

It is Brazil's turn to lead the Group of 20 major economies this year, and the country has called on the group to develop a coordinated approach for taxing ultrawealthy individuals who can move their money into low-tax jurisdictions. The goal is to mirror a global minimum tax on corporations, which roughly 140 countries signed up for in 2021 but has since run into roadblocks in the U.S. and elsewhere.

Yellen said the U.S. wouldn't support the talks on the issue. She is due to meet this week with finance ministers from the Group of Seven advanced democracies, who are expected to discuss the global wealth tax.

"We believe in progressive taxation. But the notion of some common global arrangement for taxing billionaires with proceeds redistributed in some way -- we're not supportive of a process to try to achieve that. That's something we can't sign on to," she said.

Along with ministers from Brazil and France, officials from Spain, Germany and South Africa have discussed a plan that would require billionaires to pay taxes worth at least 2% of their overall wealth every year." [1]

 The problem is not yet clear. We'll see what Trump decides about it. There is not much left to wait.

1. U.S. News: Yellen Rejects Global Tax on Billionaires. Duehren, Andrew.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 21 May 2024: A.2.