“Washington -- President Trump has a lot of big goals: completing a grand ballroom and a giant arch, putting a covey of his enemies in prison, winning a Nobel Peace Prize. Most of all, he wants the American economy to roar so loudly that no one can deny it's the greatest financial power in history.
No one has more responsibility for achieving that goal than Scott Kenneth Homer Bessent, star quarterback of Mr. Trump's economic team in his rookie season in government. According to many of Mr. Bessent's former Wall Street colleagues, however, his task has been made manifestly harder by Mr. Trump's tariffs and the Iran war.
The central components of the Treasury secretary's agenda include restoring growth after the havoc of war, rebalancing global trade, driving down inflation without choking expansion, lifting real wages for the bottom half of earners, and reasserting American dominance in the industries that will determine the next generation of prosperity -- chips, artificial intelligence, energy. His portfolio would be daunting even in peacetime. In the aftermath of a regional conflict and amid a trade confrontation with the world, it is a stress test of both policy and temperament.
In several conversations in his office, Mr. Bessent, 63, speaks about all these global challenges the way a trader might talk about a volatile market: with a mixture of confidence and probabilistic hedging. As he learned early from his macroeconomic mentor, George Soros, and has been reminded by Mr. Trump, risk is something not to be feared, but understood and leveraged. "George Soros is willing to take unlimited market risk," Mr. Bessent says, "but has incredible survival instincts. The president is willing to take unlimited political risk, but knows when to cut."
Growth has slowed, but Mr. Bessent insists it will recover. Energy prices will normalize. What he calls the "buffet" -- the spread of economic benefits to every household -- will still be set out, although delayed from the second quarter of 2026 to the third, perhaps not coincidentally right before the midterm elections that are vitally important to the White House.
China is the most urgent item in Mr. Bessent's inbox. For all the noise around tariffs, Mr. Bessent's responsibility is to manage the integrity of the U.S.-China relationship, which will largely define whether the Trump economy is a success. He presents a formulation that sounds simple but contains a dozen tensions: "We have to derisk but not decouple."
What does that mean? Mr. Bessent sketches a picture that is less rupture than recalibration. Trade continues. American companies still operate in China. The U.S. still sells agriculture, energy, financial services and software. But in three areas -- critical minerals, medicines, and semiconductors -- America becomes meaningfully independent.
"We're pretty far along," he says of rare-earth minerals. "I would say it's a step function every nine months and probably completely resolved in four years."
That timeline underscores the central contradiction in Mr. Bessent's China policy. He insists the coming summit with Xi Jinping is about "stability," avoiding escalation, keeping the relationship predictable. Yet nearly every concrete move he describes is designed to reduce dependence on the Chinese, thus minimizing Beijing's leverage.
The recent tariff spiral sharpened the point. As tariffs rose, China deployed nontariff measures, including restrictions on exports of rare-earth magnets. The U.S. responded by applying its own forms of pressure -- data controls, technology limitations, student-visa rules. "We have leverage," Mr. Bessent says, almost casually. "Whether it's aircraft engines or silicon quartz, the Chinese students, [it] really bothered them."
The deeper view he offers of China is historical, even civilizational. "They believe that they were the Middle Kingdom," he says, invoking the Qing Dynasty. "I think they want to get back to that equilibrium where the world comes to them."
This isn't the language of benign competition but of strategic rivalry and sober mistrust, softened only slightly by the possibility of "peaceful coexistence." China, he notes, "has never had allies. They have vassal states."
Yet in the same breath, Mr. Bessent argues that the goal of the summit circuit -- no fewer than four Trump-Xi meetings this year, including a Xi state visit to the White House in September, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Beijing in November, and the Group of 20 at Doral, Fla., in December -- is to keep relations steady, almost routine. The stakes are "not that high," Mr. Bessent says, "because everything gets pregamed."
The tension between those two ideas -- China as existential competitor and China as manageable counterpart -- runs through the entire approach.
But the subtext is clear -- Mr. Bessent remains staunchly wary, both culturally and commercially. "We founded the World Bank and the IMF," he says, "whereas the Chinese just want to be part of it and take it over, and they also formed the Belt and Road and the Asian Infrastructure Bank. But I think the difference is we were in it for more soft-power reasons; they are in it for more hard-power reasons."
If China is the casino, artificial intelligence is the table stakes. "If we don't win in AI," Mr. Bessent says, "then it's game over." He speaks with the urgency of someone who believes the timeline has collapsed. It isn't five years, or even two, but "a year, maybe 18 months," before the new technology defines our lives across the board.
The implications, as he describes them, are both sweeping and oddly mundane. Entire categories of work could be compressed into a fraction of their current cost. Small businesses could operate with a handful of employees and a suite of AI agents. Productivity gains could ripple across the economy in ways that are difficult to predict but impossible to ignore.
At the same time, the risks aren't theoretical. They are immediate and, in his telling, already under constant surveillance.
"There's a group of us who meet every week," he says -- a standing senior-level effort to monitor AI models, test their capabilities and assess their vulnerabilities. The concern isn't only runaway systems but misuse -- criminals, hostile actors or sabotage. The "ultimate threat" is that "somebody can back into something that's 10 times worse than Covid, like just using biological data."
He says the president and Vice President JD Vance are personally engaged with the issue, and the federal government can keep up. It is a notable statement at a time when many in Silicon Valley and beyond believe the opposite.
Mr. Bessent's prescription is a mix of targeted regulation -- controlling advanced chip exports, certifying systems in a manner akin to aircraft safety -- and a lighter touch that avoids stifling innovation. The through line is familiar: stay ahead of China, harness the upside, contain the downside.
Treasury officials say that at the Trump-Xi summit in Beijing next month, history will be made. For the first time ever, the leaders of earth's two greatest powers will discuss AI as an agenda item. Messrs. Trump and Xi will look for areas of mutual cooperation and explore ways to work together on security and threats from nonstate actors.
On taxes, Mr. Bessent's focus is less on headline rates than on distributional impact. The metric he returns to is the bottom 50% of wage earners. In Mr. Trump's first term, he notes, they saw faster percentage gains in income than the top 10%. Re-creating that dynamic is, in his view, essential, not only economically but politically.
He points to measures like the tax break for overtime pay as evidence that policy is already shifting outcomes. Treasury data, he says, show nearly half of filers benefiting from one of the administration's signature initiatives. Real wages are rising. The gap created during the inflation surge of the Biden years -- when nominal wage growth lagged behind price increases in key household categories -- can be closed.
Energy is both a constraint and a release valve in Mr. Bessent's framework. The Iran conflict has pushed prices higher, but he sees the dynamic as self-correcting. High prices spur production, which brings prices down.
More broadly, energy policy intersects with industrial policy in a manner that echoes his China thinking. The U.S., he argues, ceded too much domestic manufacturing capacity over decades, often through a combination of regulatory burden, inertia and strategic neglect. Rebuilding that capacity -- whether in chips, advanced textiles or other sectors -- isn't about nostalgia. It's about resilience.
Mr. Bessent is particularly blunt about the banking system. Regulation after the 2008-09 financial crisis produced a perverse outcome: a structure in which small banks are squeezed out while large institutions consolidate their advantages: "We went from too big to fail to too small to succeed."
The cumulative effect of these policies -- taxes, energy, deregulation -- is meant to feed into a single outcome: sustained, broad-based growth.
In some ways Mr. Bessent is an unlikely choice to be given so much authority over Mr. Trump's agenda. He isn't a political lifer or a cable-news regular. He comes from the financial world, where success is measured in returns and risk-adjusted outcomes, not electoral margins.
That background shapes both his strengths and what his critics call his blind spots. He approaches policy as a series of interlocking systems, each with its own feedback loops. He is comfortable with complexity, uncertainty and the reality that not every variable can be controlled.
At the same time, he brings an unflagging drive -- the markets never sleep -- to his government job, working nights and weekends, keeping much the same schedule as his frenetic boss. Last week, Wednesday was chock-a-block Tax Day, and Thursday was a Washington meeting with fellow G-20 finance ministers and a flight to Las Vegas for a raucous rally with Mr. Trump. On Friday, he was back in Washington for a high-stakes meeting with Anthropic, and on Saturday in the Situation Room with the president and his war cabinet discussing Iran.
Mr. Bessent was in a solid place in life when he set out to join Mr. Trump's second-term team. "I knew his brother Robert well -- that was my entree," Mr. Bessent says. "We knew each other from the New York charity circuit. We'd always want to leave early and go to Elaine's. I was at his dad's funeral. [Donald Trump's] eulogy was incredible -- he talked about how much his dad had helped him." By 2023, Mr. Bessent had analyzed the looming presidential contest and determined that Mr. Trump was likely to return to the White House. He tackled two items simultaneously: rallying support for Mr. Trump's campaign and launching his own effort to reach 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue.
"I was in the wilderness trying to get Wall Street people" to back Mr. Trump, Mr. Bessent says. "I went to see him and said, 'You are going to win. I'd like to be part of the economic team.' I was also willing to take a risk."
Growing up in South Carolina, Mr. Bessent learned early how to navigate risk and seek stability. His father, Homer Gaston Bessent Jr., was a real estate developer who suffered economic ups and downs as well as health problems. Not many Americans are both listed in the Social Register and employed as a busboy by age 9. Mr. Bessent went from boarding schools and debutante balls to serious financial distress and spent a portion of his childhood in the guest house of his ancestral home.
He chose Yale over the Naval Academy, where he had a congressional appointment. "In 1979 you could be court-martialed for being gay," he says. "My dad had gone bust again, and I chose to work three jobs and go to Yale instead. I always felt like if I outperformed, I wouldn't be discriminated against." After graduation, he opted for Wall Street rather than the foreign service, journalism, or computer science. "One of the reasons I like money management," he says, is "because there's a score. You're either good or you're not."
He says he tries "to stay balanced in terms of risk, reward. I can't tell whether I've been very successful because my dad went broke, because I managed the risk on the downside very well -- or could I have had 10 or 100 times more money, but I was too conservative, because I was always worried about following him, following him down the tubes?"
In 2011 he married John Freeman, a former prosecutor, and they have two children. Family photos are on display in his sleek, orderly office in the Treasury. "As a dad," he says, "your job is to help them realize their dream. Your children are not working on your behalf."
After he leaves the Treasury, Mr. Bessent hopes to continue working privately on supply chains, military readiness, AI policy and financial regulation. He says he has zero interest in the presidency or any other elective office. "I will take that off the table," he says. "I will be the Colin Powell of this administration."
When I ask about the Federal Reserve, however, he pauses. "I wouldn't say 'no' to being Fed chair later," he answers. "There's no election involved. You can shape the economy, and it's an institution."
That brings to mind the summers he spent as a lifeguard at Myrtle Beach, S.C. The "key to being a good lifeguard," he says, "is being able to keep an eye on the water. Know where all the pieces are. Keep an eye on people and keep people well. In lifeguarding," he says, "rule No, 1 is: Never get your hair wet. Rule No. 2 is: Most people can be saved by yelling, 'Stand up!'"
---
Mr. Halperin is editor in chief of 2WAY, a live interactive video platform.” [1]
1. The Weekend Interview with Scott Bessent: Donald Trump's Economic Engineer. Halperin, Mark. Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 25 Apr 2026: A11.
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą