“The founding father of the Swiss People's Party wants to
impose absolute neutrality on the country through a popular initiative.
Bern
should then no longer participate in the sanctions against Russia.
It's currently making waves in the Swiss media. On Tuesday,
Silvia Blocher, 77, was allowed to write about the more or less emancipated
life alongside her famous husband on a double page in the political section of
the Neue Zürcher Zeitung. While Christoph Blocher himself, 81 years old and
long since out of office, fills the headlines with what he has always loved to
do: thinking about vital issues in Switzerland.
What the formerly or in fact still strong man of the
national conservative Swiss People's Party (SVP) intends could become his last
battle as a politician. It is, once again, about his life theme, which has
regularly brought him into conflict with the zeitgeist: independence.
Switzerland, he believes, can only survive if it stays completely out of the
world's dealings, if it remains a neutral and sovereign island in the middle of
Europe.
His career began with this consideration when he
surprisingly succeeded in a referendum in 1992 in preventing Switzerland from
joining the European Economic Area. And that's how it could end when the
citizens decide about the controversial popular initiative that Blocher is
preparing.
It is intended to enshrine Switzerland's comprehensive,
unconditional neutrality in the constitution.
Blocher sees an acute need for action. In his view, the
Swiss government, the Bundesrat, has crossed a red line in its response to
Russia. As is well known, the seven-member committee initially announced that
it would not participate in the US and EU sanctions against Russia and would
only ensure that the punitive measures were not circumvented with Swiss help.
After worldwide protests, which also put moral pressure on the country, the
Federal Council caved in shortly thereafter and promised to take over the EU
sanctions in full.
For Blocher, the fact that Switzerland is carrying the EU
sanctions is a sin
The new motto is "cooperative" neutrality, Foreign
Minister Ignazio Cassis justified the swing. While US President Joe Biden
hailed that "even Switzerland" is now causing Russia pain, the
Kremlin included the Confederation on its list of "unfriendly
states".
Blocher, who watches the world from his villa over Lake
Zurich, protested quickly and loudly. In interviews and articles he stated a
fall from grace. It is precisely the "perpetual, armed and integral"
neutrality that has secured peace in the country over the past 200 years.
Integral means not supporting economic sanctions against states. The
"bread freeze," as Blocher calls it in reference to the reformer
Zwingli, is not only the "cruelest weapon" in war, after all, people
are being "starved out" on purpose. It is also fundamentally
ineffective and apparently does not impress President Vladimir Putin in the
least, but actually strengthens him. For Switzerland, on the other hand, there
is an unnecessary potential threat because it itself has become a "war
party". The country should rather offer its "good offices" and
mediate in the conflict.
"Neutrality helps not to irritate an enemy,"
Blocher argues, referring to history: After World War I, Switzerland
disregarded this principle when it joined the League of Nations and promised to
support the sanctions against Italy after its invasion of Abyssinia . An
Italian invasion of Ticino was only avoided by the collapse of the League of
Nations. Blocher says that it is acceptable that an impartial attitude will
incur the displeasure of the belligerents.
"The neutral state only has
advantages, also for the economy."
As always when something is important to him, Blocher is now
trying to correct the government, in which his party is also represented, with
the help of the people. At the end of May he invited people to a
"neutrality workshop" in Zurich's main train station, where the text
of the planned initiative was discussed. Also present: old SVP comrades-in-arms
like Ulrich Schlueer and Christoph Mörgeli, non-partisan interested parties
and, typically Blocher, a potential dissenter in the form of the Green Liberal
Nicola Forster - to clarify his own position.
The result: the popular initiative would, in addition to a
ban on alliances, prohibit any participation in sanctions, except for those
decided by the United Nations (which the veto powers in the Security Council
usually block). It is to be brought in soon.
At present, the vast majority of
Swiss support neutrality in principle.
However, it will be three to four years
before the vote is taken. That is risky, some in the train station said. What
if the Russian operation then continues, the mood changes and the vote is lost? And
so that the whole concept of neutrality would be damaged? Blocher is said to
have replied that if you don't risk anything, you don't gain anything."
Good and safe small countries are neutral. Ireland is also neutral. We are moving to Ireland from Lithuania in increasing numbers. Lithuania should be neutral too.
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą