"November 11, 2024 · Weak demand and high energy costs
are causing problems for the German chemical industry. Nobody can say today how much
production will ultimately remain in Germany. The green transformation is
becoming a ride in the fog.
The chemical industry is considered the mother of all
industries. Cars, consumer goods, houses, cosmetics, even medicines - there is
chemistry in everything. How long and complex the value chains really are is
often forgotten in good times.
The sanctions on Russia, of all things, has raised
awareness of this again. As soon as gas and oil suddenly became scarce and
expensive, supply chains threatened to break. BASF CEO Martin Brudermüller even
warned in an interview with the F.A.S. of irreversible damage if the federal
government imposed a gas boycott. It has not been that bad, but the chemical
industry is still going through a valley of tears. And the disruptions give an
idea of the rocky road ahead for industry if it does not use oil and gas.
In fact, large chemical plants are not only fueled by fossil
fuels, but gas and naphtha are also the most important basic chemicals in
chemistry. In huge plants, known as crackers, gas or naphtha comes in at the
top and important basic chemicals such as ethylene and propylene come out at
the bottom. These are then processed further in many production steps: into
plastics and insulation material, varnishes, paints, seals, adhesives, consumer
goods, fertilizers, detergents, cosmetics and, as mentioned, even medicine. In
order to become "green", the energy-intensive industry must pursue a
two-pronged approach: replacing both fossil fuels and fossil raw materials. The
transformation is enormous and it will be very expensive.
There are a good two thousand chemical and pharmaceutical
companies in Germany, employing almost half a million people. The number has
been more or less constant for 25 years; for a long time the chemical industry
was considered a haven of stability. Strikes were rare, and the last major
industrial dispute was more than fifty years ago. While large companies such as
BASF and Bayer determine the public image of the industry, the majority of the
industry is still dominated by medium-sized companies. According to the
industry association VCI, just 69 of the 2094 companies employ more than 1000
people.
In addition to individual large sites such as the BASF
headquarters in Ludwigshafen, many companies have joined forces to form
chemical parks. There they produce electricity, heat and steam together and
efficiently line up individual plants one after the other. In Europe, the
German chemical industry is by far the largest, with a global market share of
4.2 percent. But the music is playing in Asia: China, by far the largest
chemicals market, is approaching a 50 percent share of sales.
In Germany, the chemical industry is currently under
pressure. Due to weak demand from the automotive industry and the construction
industry, two of the most important customer sectors, production in this country
has fallen by more than a fifth since 2021. Many chemical plants are not
profitable due to the lack of orders, reports the VCI. The decline in
production is dramatic in some cases: Above all, ammonia production, which is
particularly dependent on gas and from which Ad Blue and fertilizers are made,
has fallen by 32 percent since 2020. For the important basic chemicals ethylene
and propylene, the declines are 17 and 15 percent.
It is unclear to what extent production in Germany will
shrink permanently. Plants are already being closed permanently. If BASF's
plant balance sheet is taken as a benchmark, this selection process is likely
to continue for some time: 80 percent of the plants at the headquarters are
therefore also competitive in the long term, the remaining 20 percent "are
associated with risks under the given circumstances".
In the last thirty years, the industry has certainly done
its "green" homework, in its own opinion. While the production of
chemical and pharmaceutical products has increased by 61 percent, energy
consumption has fallen by a fifth and greenhouse gas emissions by more than
half, reports the VCI. However, this view is distorted: It is true that
greenhouse gas emissions fell sharply, especially in the years after reunification,
when outdated GDR companies had to close. Since then, emissions have continued
to fall, but at a much slower rate. Energy-saving measures are no longer
sufficient to achieve climate-neutral production by 2045. The industry must
renew all of its processes.
Today, 85 percent of chemical production is fed by fossil
raw materials, primarily naphtha and gas. By 2050, according to the forecast of
the DECHEMA trade association, the fossil share is likely to drop to six
percent. It is to be replaced by
recycled plastics, biomass and above all carbon dioxide. Of all things, the
"climate killer" could become a raw material. According to the
Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology, basic
chemicals and synthetic fuels can be produced from it with "a few chemical
or electrocatalytic" production steps.
It is clear that the conversion will cost a lot of money and
drive up the demand for green electricity, hydrogen and carbon dioxide.
However, there are differing opinions about the right path to climate
neutrality. Forecasts vary greatly depending on how many of the plants will be
operated with electricity or hydrogen in the future, how large the proportion
of renewable raw materials or recycled plastic will be. The VCI has just
revised its demand forecast downwards due to current production declines and
new pessimistic long-term assumptions. It assumes that the production of basic
chemicals in Germany will shrink by half a percent annually until 2045, and
only the business with specialty chemicals will grow. This will do little to
change the hunger for green energy. If you take the average of the forecasts,
the chemical industry will consume seven times more electricity in 2045 than it
does today."
As you see, cheap Russian hydrocarbons-based chemistry is needed in order to build affordable "green" transformation. Chancellor Merkel was right, working with the Russians. Chancellor Scholz is wrong ruining the chances of the West in this field.
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą