Sekėjai

Ieškoti šiame dienoraštyje

2026 m. balandžio 2 d., ketvirtadienis

How A.I. Helped One Man (and His Brother) Build a $1.8 Billion Company

 


 

“Matthew Gallagher took just two months, $20,000 and more than a dozen artificial intelligence tools to get his start-up off the ground.

 

From his house in Los Angeles, Mr. Gallagher, 41, used A.I. to write the code for the software that powers his company, produce the website copy, generate the images and videos for ads and handle customer service. He created A.I. systems to analyze his business’s performance. And he outsourced the other stuff he couldn’t do himself.

 

His start-up, Medvi, a telehealth provider of GLP-1 weight-loss drugs [1], got 300 customers in its first month. In its second month, it gained 1,000 more. In 2025, Medvi’s first full year in business, the company generated $401 million in sales.

 

Mr. Gallagher then hired his only employee, his younger brother, Elliot. This year, they are on track to do $1.8 billion in sales.

 

A $1.8 billion company with just two employees? In the age of A.I., it’s increasingly possible.

 

Sam Altman, the chief executive of OpenAI, predicted the rise of a new breed of superefficient company in 2024. A one-person business worth $1 billion “would have been unimaginable without A.I.,” he said on a podcast, “and now it will happen.”

 

Now as A.I. tools spread, entrepreneurs are harnessing the technology to expand their start-ups to an enormous scale at breathtaking speed with very few humans. Big companies, especially in tech, are getting in on the disruption, too. Pinterest, Block and others have cut thousands of workers in recent months, citing efficiencies enabled by A.I.

 

Mr. Gallagher, who formerly ran a start-up that sold wristwatches, said he thought Mr. Altman’s prophecy of a one-person $1 billion company would be a firm that built A.I. He was excited when he realized he may have done it, taking an old idea — being a middleman for weight-loss drugs — and using A.I. to turbocharge it.

 

“It’s not an A.I. company, but I did it with A.I.,” he said.

 

In an email, Mr. Altman said that it appeared he had won a bet with his tech C.E.O. friends over when such a company would appear, and that he “would like to meet the guy” who had done it.

 

Medvi is technically not a one-person $1 billion company, since Mr. Gallagher hired his brother and has some contractors. The start-up, which has not raised outside funding, also has no official valuation. But many highly valued tech companies can only dream of hitting $1 billion in revenue with so few workers. Medvi is also profitable, Mr. Gallagher said.

 

The New York Times was given access to Medvi’s financials to verify its revenue and profits and interviewed Mr. Gallagher’s business partners.

 

On a recent afternoon at the Soho House club in Los Angeles, Mr. Gallagher, sporting unkempt curly hair, a baggy T-shirt and tattoos on his arms and hands, said the last 18 months had been a whirlwind.

 

He works on Medvi from his house basically anytime he’s not showering, sleeping or spending time with his two children, he said during a two-hour conversation. He even made an A.I. clone of his voice to help manage his personal life, using it to call and schedule appointments so he would have more time to work.

 

Not everyone can build such an A.I.-enabled company, though many may try. Mr. Gallagher is suited to the moment because he knows marketing and how to use cutting-edge A.I., said Kobie Fuller, an investor at the venture capital firm Upfront Ventures who has advised him.

 

“Those folks that have those skills, it’s kind of like their superpower,” Mr. Fuller said. “This is an extreme example, but I don’t think it’s going to be the last by any stretch.”

 

Mr. Gallagher has told hardly anyone about his company, which he said was raking in more than $3 million a day. He was nervous to talk publicly about it, he said.

 

“I mean, it’s crazy, right?” he asked, before answering himself. “It’s crazy.”

 

Spotting Opportunity

 

Mr. Gallagher had an itinerant childhood, living out of motels and cars for a time before landing in Cincinnati when he was 12. That was where his uncle gave him a laptop, which he used to teach himself to code so he could make a Weird Al Yankovic fan page.

 

As a teenager, Mr. Gallagher began building websites for local businesses. He always had a hustle, including selling candles and Samurai swords on eBay. At 18, after building a web hosting business, he sold it for $6,000.

 

Mr. Gallagher briefly attended the University of Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky University but did not graduate. In 2010, he moved to Los Angeles to become an actor. He eventually returned to coding, bouncing between tech jobs.

 

In 2016, he built Watch Gang, a start-up that sold wristwatches via subscription. It had fans but never turned a profit, even as Mr. Gallagher chased revenue growth and hired 60 people.

 

OpenAI’s release of ChatGPT in 2022 inspired Mr. Gallagher to start tinkering with A.I. Two years later, he met Jiten Chhabra, a co-founder of CareValidate, a medical start-up in Atlanta.

 

CareValidate offers what is essentially a telehealth-in-a-box kit. Companies, employers or retailers that want to sell customers prescription drugs can use CareValidate’s technology and network of online doctors to set up a business. The company’s software connects patients with doctors and pharmacies, which write, fulfill and ship the prescriptions. CareValidate charges fees for its software.

 

Mr. Gallagher saw an opportunity for his own telehealth business. He could use A.I. to do the branding and marketing and let CareValidate and a similar platform, OpenLoop Health, handle the doctors, pharmacies, shipping and compliance. He planned to start with GLP-1s.

 

He was entering an established market. For nearly a decade, Hims & Hers Health, Ro and other companies have sold drugs for erectile dysfunction and hair loss online, using an online network of doctors to write the prescriptions. Hims, which went public in 2021, has 2,442 employees and generated $2.4 billion in revenue last year.

 

Hims and Ro had already expanded into GLP-1 drugs, but Mr. Gallagher thought he could do the same thing faster and more efficiently with A.I. and the doctor-on-demand platforms.

 

He used many A.I. tools to build Medvi’s website, including ChatGPT, Claude and Grok. He created custom tools, including A.I. agents, or bots that perform tasks on their own, to get his software systems to communicate with one another. He tested A.I. voice tools from ElevenLabs and others for communicating with customers. And he used the image and video generators Midjourney and Runway to create media for his website and ads.

 

Altogether, he spent $20,000 on the software and the first month of marketing.

 

Medvi’s initial website featured photos of smiling models who looked A.I.-generated and before-and-after weight-loss photos from around the web with the faces changed. Some of its ads were A.I. slop. A scrolling ticker of mainstream media logos made it look as if Medvi had been featured in Bloomberg and The Times when it had merely advertised there.

 

But Mr. Gallagher was most concerned with getting Medvi’s checkout to work smoothly and making sure his A.I. customer service system stuck to the task at hand. He tested it by asking the system for lasagna recipes; it took some tweaking to get it to stop supplying them, he said.

 

Medvi opened for business in September 2024. It was perfectly timed. Americans wanted cheap GLP-1s, delivered without going to a doctor’s office. The start-up charged as little as $179 for the first month’s supply of the drugs, in line with competitors.

 

The Sky’s the Limit?

 

From the beginning, “growth was insane,” Mr. Gallagher said.

 

Medvi quickly became one of CareValidate’s and OpenLoop’s top clients. The companies said they were blown away by the start-up's speed and scale.

 

“You’re like, ‘Do you have an army of people behind you somewhere?’ And he’s like, ‘Nope,’” CareValidate’s Mr. Chhabra said of Mr. Gallagher.

 

Dr. Jon Lensing, OpenLoop’s chief executive, said Mr. Gallagher had started sharing tech tips with his company. “Matthew’s native tongue seems to be A.I.,” he said.

 

There were snags. Medvi’s customer service chatbot sometimes made up prices for the drugs. (Mr. Gallagher honored those.) Or it hallucinated, claiming Medvi sold hair-loss drugs when it didn’t.

 

If customers wanted to talk to a person, Medvi’s customer service chatbot had been trained to transfer them to Mr. Gallagher’s cellphone. That led to more than 1,000 customer service calls, he recalled.

 

To manage the onslaught, he integrated programs from OpenLoop and CareValidate that fielded customer service calls. Mr. Gallagher soon graduated from using the online legal site LegalZoom [2] to using a law firm, and from using A.I. accounting tools to using an accounting firm. He also hired media agencies to help buy ads to entice customers.

 

As sales took off, Mr. Gallagher asked Mr. Fuller, the venture capital investor, if he should raise venture funding. Mr. Fuller told him that if he didn’t need the money, he shouldn’t raise it.

 

“You should just keep building,” Mr. Fuller said he had told Mr. Gallagher. Mr. Gallagher later thanked him for the advice.

 

In March last year, Mr. Gallagher changed something minor on Medvi’s website and then went on a hike. From the trail, he got a call from one of his media agencies asking whether it was odd that there had been no orders for the last hour.

 

Mr. Gallagher realized that his update must have broken something. With no one to fix it, he sprinted home. The downtime lost him around 200 potential customers, he said.

 

Still, he was hesitant to hire anybody. At Watch Gang, having 60 employees had not helped the company grow.

 

“It just increased my costs, and then it delayed my decision-making because I had more people to deal with,” he said. Medvi’s biggest advantage was his ability to move quickly, he said.

 

Mr. Gallagher added two engineers on contract and decided to hire only Elliot, his 36-year-old brother in Cincinnati in April. Elliot’s job includes intercepting and filtering communication so Matthew can focus on his priorities.

 

“I just helped take a lot of the weight off of him,” Elliot Gallagher said in an interview.

 

That gave Matthew Gallagher breathing room to fix some shortcuts he had initially taken, like swapping out the before-and-after weight-loss photos for ones from real customers. Some photos on Medvi’s homepage remain A.I.-generated.

 

By the end of last year, Medvi had reached $401 million in annual sales and amassed 250,000 customers. It produced 16.2 percent in net profit, or $65 million, with spending going to the fees for telehealth platforms, marketing and then software. Hims, by contrast, had a net profit of 5.5 percent last year.

 

Mr. Gallagher is reinvesting some of Medvi’s profits into expansion. He considered buying companies that provide other health products, but decided it was just as easy to build himself.

 

In February, Medvi started selling men’s health products, including erectile dysfunction drugs. That business hit 50,000 customers in the first month and is on track to eclipse the GLP-1 business in four months, Mr. Gallagher said.

 

Last month, Medvi added healthy meal delivery plans, which OpenLoop handles. Next up is women’s health, including hormone therapy drugs. Hair-growth drugs, supplements and skin care products are also on the agenda.

 

Medvi’s total profit of $70 million to $80 million so far has made Mr. Gallagher emotional, given his upbringing.

 

“For the first time, I’m not in survival mode,” he said.

 

Last year, he set up a foundation with $1 million and donated to a Los Angeles cat rescue organization, with plans to also donate to a nonprofit that helps young people experiencing homelessness. His goal is to run most of Medvi’s profits through the foundation. For fun, he invests in films and buys historical items, including a pocket watch from the 1700s.

 

Mr. Gallagher does not anticipate hiring more people. He said he just didn’t see how it would help Medvi, though he misses the camaraderie of colleagues.

 

“At this point, I kind of want to hire people because I’m lonely,” he said.

 

But some human touch is still needed.

 

In September, Medvi began assigning human account managers to a subset of customers. When those customers call, text or email with a question, they connect to the same account manager. The idea is that the account managers will get to know clients and remember details like birthdays or children’s names, creating higher customer satisfaction.

 

Medvi’s seven account managers, all hired on contract, now have several hundred clients each. To manage that many relationships, they are using A.I.” [3]

 

1. A GLP-1 telehealth provider is a digital health platform that connects patients with clinicians for virtual consultations, prescriptions, and management of GLP-1 weight-loss medications (e.g., Wegovy, Ozempic) or compounded semaglutide.

 

They streamline access, allowing patients to get medications shipped to their door without in-person appointments.

 

 

Key Aspects of a GLP-1 Telehealth Provider:

 

    Virtual Consultations: Initial and follow-up visits via video or chat to assess medical history, set up a, and evaluate BMI.

    Access to Medications: Prescribe FDA-approved meds (Wegovy, Zepbound) or often offer, compounded versions, which are sometimes cheaper or more available.

    Ongoing Monitoring: Many offer ongoing care, including support for managing side effects like nausea.

    Popular Platforms: Include firms like Ro, Noom, WeightWatchers, Calibrate, Sesame, Hims & Hers, and specialized platforms.

    Costs: Often operate on a subscription model, frequently charging out-of-pocket for visits and medications, though some accept insurance.

 

These services are aimed at patients seeking convenience for managing weight loss and, occasionally, type 2 diabetes.

 

2. LegalZoom is best avoided for complex legal matters because it provides generic, non-tailored documents, lacks personalized legal advice, and can be more expensive than DIY filing or hiring a lawyer for simple tasks. It acts as an intermediary, charging fees to fill out forms you could submit directly to state systems, often with excessive upselling.

 

Top Reasons to Avoid LegalZoom

 

    No Legal Advice: LegalZoom is not a law firm, meaning its employees cannot offer legal advice, strategies, or tailor documents to specific circumstances.

    Overpriced Services: For basic LLC formation, LegalZoom charges fees for services you can do yourself for free, such as obtaining an EIN, or they charge higher rates for registered agents ($249/year) compared to competitors.

    Generic Documents: The documents produced are template-based and may not satisfy unique business needs or comply with specific, complex legal scenarios.

    Risk of Errors: Without professional legal guidance, users might choose the wrong entity type or improperly fill out forms, leading to costly mistakes later.

    Slow Processing: Their basic plans are often slower than direct filing or using a traditional attorney.

    Not Ideal for Complex Needs: It is unsuitable for complex litigation, intellectual property disputes, or complex estate planning.

 

When to Use an Attorney Instead

 

    If you have complex assets or family situations.

    For drafting custom operating agreements or complex contracts.

 

    When facing litigation or intellectual property issues.

  

 If you need specific advice on tax structure or liability protection.

 

3. How A.I. Helped One Man (and His Brother) Build a $1.8 Billion Company. Griffith, Erin.  New York Times (Online) New York Times Company. Apr 2, 2026.

„Nerealu“: Emmanuelis Macronas atmeta bendrą karinę operaciją, skirtą atverti Hormūzo sąsiaurį

 


 

„Hormūzo sąsiaurio išlaisvinimas yra „nerealu“, nes tai užtruktų ilgai ir būtų sudėtinga“, – pareiškė Prancūzijos prezidentas Emmanuelis Macronas, atmesdamas prezidento Donaldo Trumpo raginimą sąjungininkams prisiimti atsakomybę už strateginio naftos koridoriaus priežiūrą.

 

Prancūzijos prezidentas Emmanuelis Macronas ketvirtadienį atvyko į Pietų Korėją, sustodamas savo trumpametražiame vizite po Azijos sostines, kurio metu vakar Japonijoje jis daugiausia dėmesio skyrė ekonominiams ryšiams ir verslui. Atsakydamas į JAV prezidento Donaldo Trumpo vakarykštes pastabas, kuriose jis apmąstė Amerikos pažangą Irane ir paragino kitas šalis paremti šias pastangas.

 

Pažymėjęs, kad „yra tokių, kurie pasisako už Hormūzo sąsiaurio išlaisvinimą jėga per karinę operaciją“, prezidentas Macronas iš karto atmetė šią mintį. Jis sakė: „Tai nerealu, nes tai užtruktų pernelyg ilgai ir kiekvienam, kertančiam sąsiaurį, grėstų pakrantės grėsmė iš [IRGC], kuri turi didelių išteklių.“ taip pat balistines raketas [ir] daugybę kitų rizikų.“

 

Tai, kiek Iranas iš tikrųjų kontroliuoja sąsiaurį, dar neišbandyta, ir kad ir kokia grėsmė būtų buvusi praeityje, dabar ji greičiausiai gerokai suprastėjusi po intensyvaus mėnesio JAV smūgių, kurie, kaip pažymi Vašingtonas, sąmoningai buvo nukreipti į Irano jūrų ir raketų pajėgumus. Smūgiai buvo specialiai nukreipti į Irano karinį jūrų laivyną, jūrų minų gamyklas ir dėtuves bei asimetrinio karo mažųjų laivų pajėgas.

 

Trečiadienio kreipimesi pareiškęs, kad Irano oro pajėgos ir karinis jūrų laivynas „dingo“ ir yra „griuvėsiuose“, prezidentas Trumpas sakė: „mes sumušėme ir visiškai sunaikinome Iraną“ ir kad dabar pasaulio tautos, kurios labiausiai naudojasi Hormūzo sąsiauriu, turi panaudoti savo kariuomenę, kad jis liktų atviras. Prezidentas teigė, kad tai galima lengvai pasiekti ir kad jei jos iš tikrųjų imsis veiksmų, jos to nedarys vienos, nes JAV „bus naudingos“, ir kad: „Eikite į sąsiaurį ir tiesiog užimkite jį, apsaugokite jį, naudokite jį sau.“ Iranas iš esmės buvo sunaikintas, sunkioji dalis jau įveikta, tad turėtų būti lengva.“

 

Kelios šalys, įskaitant Europos valstybes, tokias kaip Prancūzija, ir Azijos valstybes, tokias kaip Japonija, pareiškė, kad norėtų prisidėti prie jūrų koalicijos, kuri patruliuotų sąsiauryje ir užtikrintų naftos tiekimą, tačiau iš esmės tik pasibaigus konfliktui ir nutraukus visas kovas. Prezidentas Trumpas vakar savo kalboje atkreipė dėmesį į šį drąsos trūkumą, pridurdamas: „Sąsiaurio problema ta, kad kažkur gali būti vienas teroristas su kulkosvaidžiu, ir jie pasakys: „O, ne visai aišku“.“

 

Prezidentas Trumpas įvardijo Prancūziją, Pietų Korėją, Japoniją ir Kiniją kaip šalis, turinčias aiškų nacionalinį interesą išlaikyti Hormūzo sąsiaurį – taigi ir per jį transportuojamą naftą – atvirą verslui. Iš tiesų, kaip pažymėta Tarptautinės energetikos agentūros santraukoje apie sąsiaurį, nors įprastai apie 25 proc. visos kasdien jūra gabenamos naftos plaukia šiuo vieninteliu strateginiu vandens keliu, 80 proc. jos yra skirta Azijai.

 

2025 m. iš 20 milijonų barelių naftos, eksportuojamos per sąsiaurį per dieną, 4,6 mln. barelių būtų skirta Kinijai, po to 2,1 mln. – Indijai ir 6,2 mln. – likusiai Azijos daliai. Europa ir Amerika buvo tik išnaša, 2025 m. gaudamos apie pusę milijono barelių per dieną.”

 

Kinija labai priklauso nuo Irano naftos. Kinijos kariuomenės panaudojimas Irano kariuomenei sunaikinti ir Kinijos naftos tiekimo kontrolei perduoti Kinijos priešui - JAV, kuris pradėtų kontroliuoti Irano naftą, kaip siūlo Amerikos pareigūnai, būtų didžiulis diplomatinis JAV pasiekimas, garsiausias istorijoje. JAV viešai pareiškė pagrindiniams importuotojams (įskaitant Kiniją): užsitikrinkite savo naftos tiekimą. Pavyzdžiui, ragina šalis „eiti į sąsiaurį ir tiesiog JĮ PAIMTI“, teigia, kad JAV vienos jo neprižiūrės („Jungtinės Valstijos to nedaro!“), ir pažymi, kad tokios paramos saugumui užtikrinti „JAV taip pat turėtų padėti“.

 

Informacija pragmatiška/realistiška: šalys, gaunančios ~45–50 % savo naftos per Hormūzą (įskaitant Kiniją), turėtų prisidėti kariniu arba diplomatiniu būdu, o ne pasinaudoti JAV pastangomis. Tai nuostabi idėja. Kartais net didžios šalys elgiasi neracionaliai, kenkdamos savo interesams, pavyzdžiui, įsiveržia į Afganistaną ir ten įstringa.


 

‘Unrealistic’: Emmanuel Macron Dismisses Joint Military Operation to Reopen Strait of Hormuz

 


 

“Liberating the Strait of Hormuz is “unrealistic” because it would be time consuming and difficult, French President Emmanuel Macron said as he shrugged off President Donald Trump’s call for allies to take up responsibility for policing the strategic oil corridor.

 

French President Emmanuel Macron arrived in South Korea on Thursday, a stop on his mini-tour of Asian capitals which saw him in Japan yesterday focussing on economic ties and business. Responding to remarks overnight by U.S. President Donald Trump, where he reflected on America’s progress in Iran and called on other countries to put their shoulders to the wheel and help with the effort.

 

Noting “there are those who advocate for the liberation of the Strait of Hormuz by force through a military operation”, President Macron rejected the notion out of hand. He said: “It is unrealistic because it would take an inordinate amount of time and would expose anyone crossing the strait to coastal threats from the [IRGC], who possess significant resources, as well as ballistic missiles, [and] a host of other risks.”

 

The extent to which Iran truly controls the Straits is untested and whatever the threat may have been in the past, it is likely much degraded now after an intense month of U.S. strikes which, as Washington notes, has deliberately targeted Iran’s maritime and missile capabilities. Strikes have specifically sought out Iran’s navy, sea mine factories and magazines, and asymmetric warfare small boat force.

 

Having said in his Wednesday address that Iran’s air force and navy were “gone” and “in ruins”, President Trump said “we’ve beaten and completely decimated Iran” and that it was now up to the nations of the world that benefit most from the Strait of Hormuz to use their own militaries to keep it open. The President said this could be achieved easily and that, if they actually acted, they wouldn’t do so alone because the U.S. “will be helpful”, and that: “Go to the Strait and just take it, protect it, use it for yourselves. Iran has been essentially decimated, the hard part is done so it should be easy.”

 

Several nations including European states like France, and Asian states like Japan, have said they would be willing to contribute to a naval coalition to patrol the Strait to ensure the flow of oil, but essentially only once the conflict is over and all fighting is done. President Trump noted this lack of courage in remarks yesterday, when he added: “the problem with the Strait is they could have one terrorist with a machine gun someplace and they’ll say ‘oh it’s not totally clear’.”

 

President Trump named France, South Korea, Japan, and China as countries with a clear national interest in keeping the Strait of Hormuz — and hence the oil that is transported through it — open for business. Indeed, as noted in a International Energy Agency digest on the Strait, while in normal times around 25 per cent of all oil transported by sea daily passes through this single strategic waterway, 80 per cent of it is destined for Asia.

 

In 2025, of 20 million barrels of oil exported through the Strait a day, 4.6 million barrels would head to China, followed by 2.1 million to India, and 6.2 million to the rest of Asia. Europe and the Americas were a footnote in comparison, receiving around half a million barrels a day each in 2025.”

 

China heavily depends on Iran’s oil. Using China’s military to kill Iran’s military and to transfer control of China’s oil supply into hands of China’s enemy, the U.S.A., that would start controlling Iran’s oil, as suggested by American officials, would be huge diplomatic achievement for the U.S.A., the most famous in history. The U.S.A has publicly told major importers (including China): secure your own oil supplies. Examples include urging nations to "go to the Strait, and just TAKE IT," stating the U.S. won't police it alone ("The United States does not!"), and noting that beneficiaries like China "should help too" to keep shipping safe.

The framing is pragmatic/realist: countries getting ~45–50% of their oil through Hormuz (China included) should contribute militarily or diplomatically rather than free-ride on U.S. efforts. That is an amazing idea. Sometimes even great countries do irrational things against their own interest, like invade Afghanistan, and get stuck there.