"Three years into a mass workplace
experiment, we are beginning to understand more about how work from home is
reshaping workers’ lives and the economy.
When workplaces are remade by a
tectonic shift — women flooding into the work force, the rise of computing — it
typically takes some time for economists, psychologists, sociologists and other
scholars to gather data on its effects.
So when employers moved suddenly to
adopt remote work during the pandemic, with the share of employed Americans
working exclusively from home rising to 54 percent in 2020 from 4 percent in
2019, researchers leaped to examine the effects of remote work on employees and
the economy at large. Now the early results are emerging. They reveal a mixed
economic picture, in which many workers and businesses have made real gains
under remote work arrangements, and many have also had to bear costs.
Broadly, the portrait that emerges is this: Brick-and-mortar
businesses suffered in urban
downtowns, as many people stopped commuting. Still, some kinds of businesses,
like grocery stores, have been able to gain a foothold in the suburbs. At the
same time, rents rose in affordable markets as remote and hybrid workers left
expensive urban housing.
Working mothers have generally
benefited from the flexibility of being able to work remotely — more of them
were able to stay in the work force. But remote work also seems to bring some
steep penalties when it comes to career advancement for women.
Studies of productivity in
work-from-home arrangements are all over the map. Some papers have linked
remote work with productivity declines of between 8 and 19 percent,
while others find drops of 4 percent for
individual workers; still other research has found productivity gains of 13 percent or even 24 percent.
Nick Bloom, an economist at Stanford
and a prolific scholar on remote work, said the new set of studies shows that
productivity differs between remote workplaces depending on an employer’s
approach — how well trained managers are to support remote employees and
whether those employees have opportunities for occasional meet-ups.
Researchers tend to agree that many
workplaces have settled into a new hybrid phase, where offices are at about half their
prepandemic occupancy levels and about a quarter of
American workdays are done from home. That suggests some of the effects of
remote work may stick.
As Mr. Bloom put it: “This is the
new normal.”
Urban
Downtowns
Photos of urban downtowns in their Covid
lockdowns are eerie, with silent streets, wilted office plants and dusty cubicles.
When some 50 million Americans
started working from home in the early days of the pandemic, brick-and-mortar
retailers clustered in urban downtowns were hurting. The number of downtown
clothing stores fell 8 percent from late 2019 to late 2021, according to a
study using transaction data from 70 million Chase Bank
customers. General goods stores in downtowns — including anything from
department stores to florists to book sellers — fell 7 percent, and grocery
stores declined 2 percent.
Some of those businesses followed
remote workers to the suburbs. During that period, there was a roughly 3
percent increase in the number of suburban grocery stores, slightly outpacing
the urban decline, particularly in suburbs where remote work
levels were high.
In the coming years, the movement of
retailers from downtowns to suburbs is likely to prove difficult for low-income
workers who cannot afford to live in these areas, some of them affluent, where
retailers may be hiring. This problem is already visible in the Bay Area. Take
the case of Maria Cerros-Mercado, who used to
work at a salad shop in San Francisco, a 20-minute walk from her home. Now she
commutes by Uber from the city to the shop’s new location in Mill Valley, a
wealthy suburb in Marin County.
But some economists argue that many
Americans stand to gain from the effects of remote work because rents in rural
and suburban areas are likely to begin dropping. One recent study used data
from postal service address changes, rent changes on Zillow and the
construction industry to project the potential rent effects of remote and
hybrid work. The pandemic saw a temporary rent spike in previously affordable
areas — think Dallas; Manchester, N.H.; and upstate New York — because many
remote workers left the priciest housing markets once they gave up daily
commutes. As construction catches up with that new demand, economists say,
rents will fall back down.
“If you zoom out, one of the big problems
in housing in the last ten years has been affordability,” said Jack Liebersohn,
an economist at the University of California, Irvine. “This could help simply
because people can live in more affordable areas, where we can afford to
build.”
And there could be an unexpected
bonus: A study in Britain
showed that burglaries declined nearly 30 percent in areas with high rates of
working from home, which the researchers attributed to the increase of “eyes on
the street” in those neighborhoods.
Working
Women
For decades, a working mother’s
schedule has felt like an equation that won’t balance. Many women are expected
to still be at their desks at 5 p.m., and simultaneously at school pickup.
They’re supposed to be in an office, and also available at home when their
children are coughing and turned away from day care. (Ample data shows that
this bind tends to constrict mothers more than fathers.)
Remote work slightly eases that
conundrum, according to research using
prepandemic data from economists at the University of Virginia and the
University of Southern California. In fields like computer science, marketing
and communications, which welcomed remote work from 2009 to 2019, working
mothers’ employment rates increased.
There was an almost one-to-one correlation: When remote work rose 2 percent, there
was a 2 percent rise in mothers’ employment. Even so, the employment rates
for working mothers still lagged those of women without children, though remote
work diminished that gap.
Claudia Goldin, who this week was
awarded a Nobel Prize in economics, has shown that women tend to seek jobs with
more flexibility so they can take care of household responsibilities. That has
contributed to the gender pay gap.
While some working women,
particularly mothers, might gain from being remote, women tend to see greater
penalties when they do so. In a study of engineers
at a Fortune 500 company, remote work had a negative effect on the amount of
feedback junior employees got on their work — with the penalties more
pronounced for women.
“Proximity has a bigger impact on
women’s comfort with asking follow-up questions,” said Emma Harrington, an
economist at the University of Virginia, who conducted both the study on remote
work’s effect on feedback, as well as the one on mothers’ work force
participation.
Men appeared more comfortable asking
clarifying questions even if they weren’t physically near colleagues.
Women may also face more undeserved
questions about their productivity, wherever they work. In a series of studies
with more than 2,000 participants, researchers in Wisconsin and Canada found
that both men and women were more likely to suspect women than men of shirking
work. Some of these employees worked from home and some did not.
When study participants saw through
video footage that a female employee wasn’t at her desk, this was attributed to
something nonwork-related 47 percent of the time; for men, it was attributed to
nonwork activities just 34 percent of the time.
“It’s possible that the study
participants might be responding to the realities of the world in which women
sometimes do bear more household responsibilities,” added Ms. Harrington, who
wasn’t involved in this study.
Remote
Productivity
Whether work-from-anywhere setups
hurt productivity or help it has been a burning question for executives.
Early evidence came in a 2013 paper from Mr. Bloom and others about a call
center in China that allowed some employees to be mostly remote for 9 months,
and found that productivity rose 13 percent. Just under 10 percent of this
boost was attributed to people taking fewer breaks, and 4 percent to them doing
more calls per minute because their working environments were quieter.
But during the pandemic when
millions of workers suddenly shifted to being remote, the effects were more
complex. The arrangements hadn’t been figured out in advance. The move to
remote work wasn’t voluntary. So the results were more scattered.
A study of an Asian information technology
company’s remote employees during the pandemic showed a decline in productivity
of 8 to 19 percent. Another, looking at an American call center, found that
when workers went remote, they made 12 percent fewer
calls. On the other hand, a study of the
productivity of economic researchers in the United States during the pandemic
found a roughly 24 percent increase in their output.
These disparate findings leave some
questions unanswered. “How on earth can you get a more than 30 point spread
between them?” Mr. Bloom asked.
“It all comes down to how workers are managed. If you set up
fully remote with good management and incentives, and people are meeting in
person, it can work. What doesn’t seem to work is sending people home with no
face-time at all.””
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą