"As Kyiv
denies its responsibility for the incident in Poland and seeks to include
Lithuania in the investigation, political scientists say that this is how
Ukraine is looking for allies in the West who can defend its position.
"Ukrainians
believe that Lithuania will see the situation similarly to Ukraine. (...) I see
a lot of risks and I don't really know what the benefits would be. Unless our
engineers know something that Americans or Poles don't. But for now it would be
hard to believe," Mariusz Antonowiczius, a lecturer at Vilnius
University's Institute of International Relations and Political Sciences (VU
TSPMI), told BNS on Thursday.
He spoke this way
after Lithuania received a note from Ukraine, in which Vilnius is offered to
join the ongoing investigation in Poland regarding a rocket that fell on the
border and killed two people.
According to Kyiv,
Ukraine, Lithuania and Poland could participate in the international
investigation, as well as the United States, the latter two of which are
currently conducting their own investigation.
Ukrainian
President Volodymyr Zelenskyi said on Thursday that he had received
confirmation that Ukrainian specialists would participate in the investigation.
According to a CNN
source in the Ukrainian president's office, Ukrainian investigators have
already arrived at the site in Poland where the missile landed on Tuesday.
According to
experts, Ukraine's attempt to participate in the investigation by including
Lithuania may have a more negative impact on Kyiv itself, as there are risks
that such actions will be understood as dividing unity.
"It's risky
what they're doing right now. (...) The desire to include more countries that
are completely unrelated to the case raises the question of who needs it. It
seems to me that this can be understood as a lack of trust in the parties
investigating the incident," TSPMI professor Dovilė Jakniūnaitė said to
BNS.
"Here is a
matter of expertise. Do you really need an additional one? Is the expertise of
Americans and Poles not enough?" she added.
Political
scientists also see the risks that Ukrainians' assessment of the missile, which
is contrary to NATO's position, may reduce the desire of the West to support
Ukraine and inflame the sentiment of a part of the public that this is an
attempt to involve the NATO in the Third World War.
"Instinctive
Anxiety"
After the first
reports about the missile that fell in Poland on Tuesday, the reactions of the
Western leaders were rather restrained. They expressed full support for Warsaw,
but did not immediately rush to blame Moscow.
At that time, Kyiv
immediately declared that it was a Russian missile.
At the time,
Western countries claim that preliminary data indicate that the missile was
launched by Ukrainian forces defending against Kremlin attacks and then
accidentally strayed into a neighboring country.
“I think they
rushed it on a day when everyone was very obviously very cautious. It was
favorable for the Ukrainians to have the idea that it was a Russian
missile," said D. Jakniūnaitė.
This position, she
said, was driven by an "instinctive worry" that a confession might
reduce support. However, she does not rule out the possibility that Kyiv has
information that is not available to partners.
"Either they
have information they're not providing for some reason, or they don't want to
back away from their narrative and remain a clear victim." It is, let's
face it, favorable for them. I don't know why Ukraine thinks that it is more
favorable to destroy this consistent Western narrative than to adapt to it.
This is a big uncertainty," said the political scientist.
"I think one
of their fears is to lose control of the narrative about themselves," she
added.
"More
negative consequences"
For his part, M.
Antonowicz emphasizes that Ukraine is simply afraid to admit that
"somewhere there was a mistake or something did not work".
"I can
understand why Ukraine is behaving like this. Zelensky is afraid that because of
this, the reluctance of some political forces to give more weapons will become
active, they will say that if the Ukrainians are shooting at us, why should we
help them," said the political scientist.
"They are
afraid that if this narrative takes root that there was a Ukrainian missile
here, the consequences will be much worse. And if the narrative that there is a
Russian missile takes hold, then the only response would be to give Ukraine
even more weapons, perhaps to establish a no-fly zone on the border of
Ukraine," he added.
The political
scientist emphasized that such inflexibility and categorical position of
Ukraine can be exploited by the Kremlin's propaganda in order to show Kyiv as
the instigator of a bigger war.
"With such a
position, he is harming himself. It also harms the coalition supporting Ukraine
in the West and beyond," said M. Antonowicz.
After Ukraine
invited Vilnius to get involved in the investigation of the missile that landed
in Poland, Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis stated that he
supports such an idea.
However, political
scientists view this position of the head of Lithuanian diplomacy with
skepticism.
"Considering
the trust between Lithuania and Ukraine, Lithuania could play such a non-public
role and convey the message that such a position can in turn lead to more
negative consequences," said M. Antonowiczius."
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą