"Increasing
spending on national defense is a way to prepare the country for the biggest
possible threats. It is necessary to master the latest military technologies.
Here, the neighbors, the Estonians, have set out to build an entire defense
industrial park, where ammunition, cars, and small drones would be produced.
Meanwhile, the Lithuanians began to structurally strengthen their military
capabilities. It is necessary to establish a separate military unit on the
example of Ukraine - an unmanned systems force consisting of drones, sea drones
and ground robots. Large funds will be allocated to new weapons, equipment and
ammunition, acquiring new air defense systems.
In the course of
medium-range air defense, our state loudly announced the purchase of the NASAMS
system... And it is this name that causes questions for every taxpayer. The
bottom line is that our nation had already acquired a medium-range air defense
system for NASAMS, only ... it was not transferred to where it was needed,
because of the history of the missiles, it was inoperable. The former Minister
of National Defense, Arvydas Anušauskas, spoke about this, promising to open a
thick smoke screen, and in fact, the possible large-scale corruption in arms
procurement hidden under this metaphor. Who could deny that precisely because
of this statement, this minister was dismissed without explanation. In his
programmatic article "The army always prepares only for future
scenarios" (Lietuvos Aidas, No. 10), he points out another potentially
criminal factual circumstance: in national defense procurement, contracts were
tolerated without guaranteeing the supply of spare parts.
In other words,
non-functioning, dummy weapons were purchased, the use of which is impossible
under the conditions of emerging threats. And this would mean the inevitable,
brutal and senseless deaths of soldiers, unable to defend themselves. It is
obvious that this type of destructive procurement is nothing but the work of
the internal enemy of the state, and all hostile special services usually use
corrupt officials and politicians.
However, the biggest
surprise is the state controlling institutions, whose duty is to stop any
manifestations of corruption in state governance. Unbelievably, no
investigation was launched after the specific facts and exposure made public by
a high-ranking official, maliciously disrupting arms purchases worth tens of
millions of euros. And this is not the story of some golden spoons, when
kitchen equipment for the Lithuanian army was bought much more expensive than
in an ordinary store.
Today, the increase
in the defense budget means enormous funds that can be successfully stolen
without institutional supervision, especially with the emergence of new legal
nuances in the procedures for arms procurement. Large-scale corruption always
has a destructive effect on the state's defense and security policy, and
hinders economic and political development. It was not for nothing that Dante
put corrupt officials in the lowest circle of hell.
The strength of
democracy is primarily the strength of legitimacy. When the political will is
weak, and the institutions and their leaders openly tolerate corrupt
transactions, the civic responsibility of the Lithuanian people for the defense
and security of the state must be strengthened.
Democratic monitoring
is the opportunity of the society itself to control the state institutions and
demand from them first of all transparent use of budget funds and
accountability.
We invite you to join
the initiative of the Democratic Monitoring Group, whose goal is transparency
and accountability in the use of defense budget funds.
We will demand legal
responsibility for corrupt acts and damage caused to the state.
We will defeat the
corrupt internal enemy with the will of the people and the efforts of all the
people of Lithuania."
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą