"If work for companies like Uber and Lyft once carried some
appeal for offering flexibility, the kind of labor it has come to represent is
now used by some as shorthand for a raw deal.
When more than 11,000 film and television writers in the
Writers Guild of America union went on strike this month, they called out
deteriorating working conditions, criticized unfair pay and said they worried
about losing their jobs to artificial intelligence.
One of their demands stood out: Hollywood writers wanted
studios to guarantee them weeks of work at a time, giving them some certainty,
rather than a new method that would hire them by the day. In other words, they
want to avoid becoming part of the gig economy.
Adam Conover, a comedian, said studios were trying to
“employ us one day a week like we’re Uber drivers.” David Simon, the creator of
“The Wire,” wrote that screenwriting had become “a ruthless gig economy.” And
Lisa Takeuchi Cullen, a writer and producer for “Law and Order: SVU,” tweeted
that “we fight for writing as a career and not a cheap gig.”
“We’re looking at a future where writers could be hired per
day in order to come in and work on an ongoing series,” Ms. Takeuchi Cullen
said in an interview. Writers already work on a freelance basis, but she said
day-to-day arrangements were more unpredictable and left them in a bind, unable
to predict their finances or pay their rent. “Suddenly, a television writer is
going from job to job to job, trying to patch together their annual income.”
In other words, for some, gig work has become shorthand for
instability and low wages. That’s what state lawmakers in Minnesota thought,
too, when they passed a bill this month guaranteeing minimum pay for Uber and
Lyft drivers that they said would add a layer of security to a challenging
career. It was vetoed by the governor Thursday, one sign of how fraught the
question of protections for an ad hoc work force has become.
The writers’ strike and demands have prompted renewed
attention to gig work, where someone might work for a variety of companies, or
for themselves, often with irregular hours. It’s an old concept, with musicians
playing gigs and artists and other creative types working their own hours while
selling their work.
Over the last decade, the idea of gig work has been
popularized by app-based platforms like Uber and Lyft, which classify their
drivers as independent contractors and avoid treating them as employees. Many
full-time workers, especially those in low-wage jobs, were enticed to these platforms
by the prospect of working flexible hours and driving passengers around to make
money.
The allure of flexibility soon gave way to a reality of low
pay and unreliable hours, labor advocates say, though the companies say
drivers’ wages are still increasing and that record numbers of people are
driving on their platforms.
Still, the shifting perception of Uber and similar companies
has caused some workers to sour on the idea of gig labor, even though workers
for online platforms make up only a small part of the gig economy and less than
1 percent of the overall labor force, by some estimates.
“Gig work has become a dirty word. Ten years ago, it still
contained this possibility of freedom from the 9-to-5,” said Louis Hyman, the
author of a book about the gig economy and temporary work. “It’s gone from
being the possibility of freedom to the certainty of insecurity.”
It’s difficult to determine how big the U.S. gig labor force
is today, in part because gig work has so many different possible meanings.
Most estimates, including from federal data and academic studies, suggest that
10 to 15 percent of U.S. workers rely on or participate in alternative or gig
work, though some tallies suggest as many as a third of U.S. workers
occasionally receive some kind of supplemental income from this work.
Though drivers for Uber, Lyft, DoorDash and Instacart make
up a small percentage of this work force, their concerns — about earning less
money, growing expenses and the increasing dangers of their job — have
reverberated across the gig industry.
Bitter fights between labor advocates and the companies have
erupted across the country over whether drivers should be considered part of
the gig economy at all. Labor activists contend that the platforms are
misclassifying their drivers as independent contractors and depriving them of
labor protections and employee benefits, while not allowing them to act fully
autonomously. The companies say drivers prefer the flexibility of being
independent, and they have cobbled together some compromises that offer limited
benefits while maintaining that flexibility.
Some drivers say they have seen their wages decline. When
Eid Ali first started driving for Uber and Lyft in Minnesota nearly a decade
ago, he said he earned as much as $400 per week, driving full time. Over the
last few years, it’s been more like $100 or $150, before expenses, for the same
number of hours driven.
For drivers like himself, “it was a slow realization,” Mr.
Ali said. He said drivers initially gushed about the benefits of being a gig
worker, with decent pay and flexibility. Now, they are more likely to dissuade
others from such work.
“They used to say something positive about the gig economy —
‘Yes, we are making enough to feed our families, it is flexible, we are working
whenever we want,’” he said. “That is not there now — it’s gone.”
Mr. Ali, the president of an advocacy group called the
Minnesota Uber/Lyft Drivers Association, helped push for the Minnesota gig
bill.
Others say they have not seen much of an erosion in the
promise of gig work. It is still a popular way for people to earn money on the
side, and a coalition called Protect App-Based Drivers and Services, which is
backed by the gig companies, said driver earnings are rising. The coalition
pointed to compromises — like Proposition 22 in California, which prevented
drivers from being classified as employees but gave them a minimum wage and
limited benefits — as signs of progress.
“More than 1.3 million Californians choose to work with an
app-based rideshare or delivery platform because this kind of work offers
guaranteed earnings and benefits like access to a health care stipend,” said
Molly Weedn, a spokeswoman for the coalition.
Alexsiya Flores, a part-time gig driver for companies like
DoorDash and Shipt, a delivery service, said she has not “seen that much
pushback — I’ve seen things getting better” because of minimum pay bills like
Prop 22.
“I am always looking for things that have flexibility,” said
Ms. Flores, a filmmaker in Los Angeles who is part of the industry coalition.
Still, labor experts and advocates say the term “gig work,”
in the minds of many, has become a stand-in for low-paid or exploitative work —
in part because of how people perceive companies like Uber.
“Uber and Lyft have made that more negative connotation more
prominent,” said Laura Padin, the director of work structures at the National
Employment Law Project, which has argued that gig drivers should be classified
as employees. “There’s been a shift in what people see about those types of
jobs — people realized they’re not as good as they seemed” initially.
Low pay and unhappy working conditions are far from
exclusive to the gig economy, and might even be one reason gig work continues
to grow despite its drawbacks.
“These kinds of low-paid platform jobs are only possible
because the rest of the economy has failed the American worker,” Mr. Hyman
said, arguing that the financial stress for workers in retail and service
industries made Uber seem like a favorable alternative.
The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, a
trade association that represents film companies, challenged striking writers’
characterizations that studios are trying to turn Hollywood work into part of
the gig economy.
“Employment as a writer has almost nothing in common with
standard ‘gigs,’” the group said in a statement, noting that many television
writers are guaranteed a specific number of weeks or episodes of employment,
and that writers often receive benefits like health insurance and contribution
to a pension. Access to those benefits depends on how many weeks of work
writers get.
But writers say the rise of streaming has led fewer episodes
of television shows and truncated writers rooms, causing studios to employ
writers for shorter, more sporadic periods of time.
Such a system hurts both the quality of television shows and
the ability of writers to earn decent wages, they said.
“How do people make a living if they are vulnerable to short
terms of employment?” Mr. Simon, the creator of “The Wire,” said in an
interview.
He said people on the picket lines had been discussing how
the type of gig work associated with Uber had arrived at their industry. “The
formula is always the same — labor is only a cost, and to the extent that they
can cut costs, they will.””
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą