"The Rhine-Main universities want to provide as unlimited
access to their research results as possible. This has many advantages, but
also entails some risks. An Open Science Festival will take place in Mainz on
Tuesday and Wednesday.
The corona pandemic has shown how helpful it is when
researchers quickly share their findings with the world.
However, universities
have long been pursuing the goal of reaching the largest possible audience with
science: the keyword Open Science summarizes all efforts not only to share research
results quickly and widely, but also original data and the means by which they
are obtained - for example software and devices.
The universities of Frankfurt, Darmstadt and Mainz have
committed themselves to promoting all aspects of open science. In an as yet
unpublished paper, which the FAZ has seen, they express their willingness to
grant free access to data, research results, teaching materials and parts of
their infrastructure where it is possible and sensible. This makes research
results easier to verify and use and increases the visibility of science.
“Don’t reveal original ideas too early”
On Tuesday and Wednesday, an open science festival will also
take place at the University of Mainz, where ideas and initiatives for
transparent science will be presented. Stefan Müller-Stach will give the
welcoming speech. The Vice President for Research at Gutenberg University is
convinced that open access - publishing outside of specialist journals -
advances research: "Good science can only work if you publish as early as
possible."
The mathematician believes it is equally important to share
what often makes the advancement of knowledge possible in the first place:
"By giving young researchers open access to equipment and methods, we are
also doing something to prevent established scientists from cultivating their
own assets, so to speak."
Müller-Stach knows that more transparency also brings with
it dangers. One risk with open access is that exciting results from a doctoral
thesis, for example, could be stolen by fraudsters and then published in a
lower-quality journal. "Researchers need to be made aware of the fact that
they should not reveal original ideas too early."
Post from amateur mathematicians
There have also been cases in which preprint servers, on
which work is published before it has been reviewed by peers, have been used
for entirely unscientific purposes. Last year, a former employee of the
University of Frankfurt posted a paper with an absurd success story on such a
platform - apparently with the intention of discrediting his former working
group.
Open access media often have an editorial board that can
intervene in the event of obvious misuse. Müller-Stach admits, however, that
nonsense can sometimes be published on the university's own platform
"Gutenberg Open Science" without it being immediately noticed.
However, he has not yet heard of anything like that.
The vice president sees another side effect of the new
openness as fundamentally positive: "Open access means that more suspected
cases of scientific misconduct may be reported." This would be an
improvement in quality if it were not slander.
It is inevitable that self-proclaimed private scholars draw
their own conclusions from freely available data and essays and in turn delight
professional researchers with their findings without being asked. Müller-Stach
himself receives mail from amateur mathematicians who believe they have finally
proven the famous Riemann conjecture on the random distribution of prime
numbers. He bears it with composure."
If our goal is faster economic development, based on investments in research by the state and private companies, then more people pushing our research forward automatically means more chances to create applications in practice, about which the most important scientists often know little.
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą