Sekėjai

Ieškoti šiame dienoraštyje

2024 m. sausio 23 d., antradienis

Where did we come to our European living places from? Where did we bring our diseases from?

"DNA fragments from thousands of years ago are providing insights into multiple sclerosis, diabetes, schizophrenia and other illnesses.

Multiple sclerosis, an autoimmune disease that affects 2.9 million people, presents a biological puzzle.

Many researchers suspect that the disease is triggered by a virus, known as Epstein-Barr, which causes the immune system to attack the nerves and can leave patients struggling to walk or talk. But the virus can't be the whole story, since nearly everyone is infected with it at some point in life.

A new study found a possible solution to this paradox in the skeletal remains of a lost tribe of nomads who herded cattle across the steppes of western Asia 5,000 years ago. It turns out that the nomads carried genetic mutations that most likely protected them from pathogens carried by their animals, but that also made their immune systems more sensitive. These genes, the study suggests, made the nomads' descendants prone to a runaway immune response.

The finding is part of a larger, unprecedented effort to understand how the evolutionary past has shaped the health of living people. Researchers are analyzing thousands of genomes of people who lived between Portugal and Siberia and between Norway and Iran roughly 3,000 to 11,000 years ago. They hope to trace the genetic roots of not only multiple sclerosis, but also diabetes, schizophrenia and many other modern illnesses.

"We are taking ancient human genomics to a whole new level," said Eske Willerslev, a geneticist at the University of Copenhagen who led the effort.

The researchers published the multiple sclerosis study as well as three other papers on the genetics and health of ancient peoples on Wednesday in the journal Nature.

For more than a decade, Dr. Willerslev and other researchers have been pulling DNA from ancient human bones. By comparing the surviving genetic material with that of living people, the scientists have been able to track some of the most significant migrations of people across the world.

For example, they have chronicled the movement of farmers from what is now Turkey across Europe starting about 8,000 years ago. These early farmers encountered European hunter-gatherers who had lived on the continent for more than 30,000 years. In some places, hunter-gatherer DNA vanished from skeletons after the arrival of the farmers, suggesting violent conflicts. In other places, the two populations mingled enough to produce later generations with a mixed ancestry.

Thousands of years passed before the next big migrational shift. About 5,000 years ago, European DNA began to show the genetic signatures of a group of pastoralists who lived on the steppes that stretch from Ukraine to Kazakhstan, called the Yamnaya.

The Yamnaya traveled on horses and in wagons across hundreds of miles of grassland, herding cows, goats and sheep along the way. Even without farms or cities, they prospered for centuries, burying their dead with gold and jewelry.

In the Bronze Age, the Yamnaya expanded their territory, sweeping through much of Asia as well as Europe. Dr. Willerslev and his colleagues have found that once in Europe, the group often wiped out the farmers it encountered, although they also had peaceful relations in some places.

Today, people in northern Europe can trace most of their ancestry to the Yamnaya. Farther south, Yamnaya ancestry is less common. People there instead have more ancestry from Near East farmers and Europe's earlier hunter-gatherers.

Dr. Willerslev and his colleagues wondered what kind of genetic variations each ancient group carried by each ancient group and how they affected their health. To find out, the researchers studied some of their living descendants.

They took advantage of UK Biobank, a huge database of DNA and medical information. Most of the 433,395 volunteers whom the scientists studied were born in Britain, but 24,511 were born in other countries.

The researchers were able to tie thousands of genetic variants in the database to increased risks for a wide range of diseases. They then compared the volunteers' DNA with the genetic fragments from ancient skeletons.

One analysis found that hunter-gatherers from Western Europe, for example, carried many of the variants that raise the risk for high cholesterol, high blood pressure and diabetes. Another showed that ancient Near East farmers carried a high burden of variants linked to anxiety and other mood disorders.

These findings don't necessarily mean that these ancient people suffered from these conditions. Genetic variants lay the trap, but it's often the environment that springs it.

Diabetes, for example, has become increasingly common in the modern world, in part because of the cheap, sugar-loaded food that makes up an increasing part of our diet. In earlier centuries, high-risk genes for diabetes may not have had the opportunity to give rise to the disease.

In some cases, Dr. Willerslev and his colleagues found, these genetic variants provided ancient peoples with a survival advantage.

The variants that raise the risk of multiple sclerosis, for example, became steadily more common among the Yamnaya. The nomads who carried them appear to have had more offspring than those who didn't.

"These variants that are causing the high risk of multiple sclerosis today must in the past have had a benefit," Dr. Willerslev said.

The new studies give some strong hints about what that benefit is. Some of the skeletons contained DNA not just from humans, but also from disease-causing viruses and bacteria. Many of these pathogens did not appear among hunter-gatherers or even among the earliest farmers in Europe. But the Yamnaya remains contained the genetic signatures of a number of pathogens, including the one that caused plague.

"These variants seem to give some kind of protection from infectious diseases," Dr. Willerslev said.

A number of studies on multiple sclerosis suggest that the variants that raise the risk of the disease also make the immune system's attack against viruses and bacteria more aggressive.

Dr. Willerslev and his colleagues argued that the Yamnaya were more vulnerable to animal diseases than previous humans were. The Yamnaya depended on animals for meat and milk and were in constant contact with their herds as they moved across the steppes.

Those conditions provided a new opportunity for diseases to jump to humans. In response, the Yamnaya evolved immune-related genes that helped them fend off the new enemies.

"They've made a really, really compelling case," Yassine Souilmi, a genomicist at the University of Adelaide in Australia, said of Dr. Willerslev and his colleagues. "I'll be shocked if further experimental testing doesn't match their conclusions."

Dr. Lars Fugger, a multiple sclerosis expert at the University of Oxford who collaborated with Dr. Willerslev on the new studies, said that the disease may not have become common until recent decades. In today's environment, with less infectious disease than past centuries, he said, a strong immune system becomes more likely to misfire, attacking its own body.

"Many of us are living in an environment that is squeaky clean," Dr. Fugger said. "The balance is no longer there."

Understanding the evolutionary roots of multiple sclerosis could guide researchers to better treatments for the disease. Currently, the only effective treatments for the condition are drugs that suppress the immune system. To Dr. Fugger, those drugs seem like blunt instruments against a delicately balanced part of our biology.

"Rather than just knocking it out, we should just try to find out in greater detail how it's unbalanced, and then try to recalibrate it," he said.

The researchers are starting similar analyses of other diseases, such as schizophrenia and psoriasis. "This is just the beginning," Dr. Fugger said.

For now, they are continuing to rely on the UK Biobank, which means their results will be largely limited to genes that have influenced the health of northern Europeans. "It would be phenomenal to have similar studies in other parts of the world," said Lluis Quintana-Murci, an evolutionary geneticist at Institut Pasteur who was not involved in the research.

But there are few opportunities to carry out such studies. Many countries lack detailed electronic health records, for one thing. And unethical behavior of Western scientists has left many Indigenous populations uninterested in donating DNA to such efforts.

Dr. Souilmi, who is helping to build a database for Indigenous Australians, said that the different evolutionary path of each population could reveal important insights about human biology in general. "By studying other parts of the world, we're actually broadening our understanding of all human conditions today," he said." [1]

1. Clues to Modern Medical Mysteries in Ancient Bones: [Science Desk]. Zimmer, Carl.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 23 Jan 2024: D.5.

 

Protesting farmers' equipment is already in Vilnius: "No farmers, no food, no future"

  We have never lived so well in Lithuania. Well, we agreed to buy German Leopard tanks for two billion euros. As in the case of Wolves, we will make Lithuanian the names of Leopards, they will be Cats. We will press grapes with those Cats. And we will deport farmers from Lithuania. They only prevent us from creating a real dream world.

Protestuojančių ūkininkų technika – jau Vilniuje: „Nėra ūkininkų, nėra maisto, nėra ateities“

Dar niekada Lietuvoje taip gerai negyvenome. Va sutarėme pirkti vokiečių tankus Leopardus už du milijardus eurų. Kaip ir Vilkų atveju, Leopardų pavadinimus sulietuvinsime, bus Katinai. Su tais Katinais spausime vynuoges. O ūkininkus vysim iš Lietuvos. Jie tik trukdo mums kurti tikrą svajonių pasaulį.


„Google debesys“ sumažina mokestį, nes didėja priežiūra

   „Google“ debesų kompiuterijos padalinio sprendimas panaikinti tam tikrus duomenų mokesčius išryškina nuolatinį debesų kainodaros sudėtingumą, nes įmonės siekia sumažinti technologijų išlaidas. Šis žingsnis sutampa su didesne debesų konkurencijos reguliavimo priežiūra, bet gali būti nepakankamai toli, kad patenkintų kai kuriuos kritikus.

 

     „Google debesys“ šį mėnesį pašalino mokesčius, kuriuos klientai moka už duomenų perkėlimą iš debesies platformos į kitą teikėją arba duomenų centrą – tapo pirmuoju tarp pagrindinių debesies paslaugų teikėjų, kuris tai padarė. Tokie mokesčiai patenka į „duomenų išėjimo“ išlaidų kategoriją, kuri apima duomenų perkėlimą tarp regionų, debesies paslaugas ir kitus teikėjus, ir yra įprasta praktika tarp pagrindinių debesijos paslaugų teikėjų.

 

     „Norėjome tai panaikinti, nes manome, kad jei klientai nori išeiti iš Google Cloud Platform ir susiras geresnį paslaugų teikėją, jie turėtų galėti tai padaryti lengvai, greitai ir be jokių išlaidų“, – sakė jis. Amit Zavery, „Google debesų“ viceprezidentas ir platformos vadovas.

 

     Šis žingsnis įvyksta, kai sąnaudas suprantantys vyriausieji informacijos pareigūnai vis dažniau audituoja debesų sąskaitas, o reguliavimo institucijos vis labiau tikrina debesų konkurenciją. Abiem atvejais mokesčių už duomenis ėmimas gali prilygti antikonkurencinei praktikai, nes jie siekia nuo dešimčių tūkstančių iki milijonų dolerių už didžiulį duomenų kiekį, taip atgrasant įmones nuo kelių debesies platformų naudojimo ar paslaugų teikėjų keitimo.

 

     „Google“ pokyčius palankiai įvertino kai kurie CIO, kurie sako, kad dažnai susiduria su ribojančia kainodara ir licencijavimo mokesčiais iš įmonių technologijų pardavėjų. „Dabar, kai jie suteikia jums išeities, kurios kiti paslaugų teikėjai dar neduoda, man tai skiriasi“, – sakė finansinių technologijų įmonės „Jack Henry & Associates“ CIO Robas Zelinka. Monett, Mo., įsikūrusi įmonė naudoja kelis debesų paslaugų teikėjus, įskaitant „Google Cloud“.

 

     Tačiau kiti teigia, kad bendrovės „Alphabet“ pakeitimas mažai padeda išspręsti didesnius debesų kainodaros iššūkius, tokius, kaip netikėtos debesų sąskaitos ir kelių debesų platformų valdymo išlaidos.

 

     „Nors šis pasiūlymas suteikia galimybę sutaupyti išlaidas ir padidinti lankstumą, labai svarbu pripažinti jo sąlyginį pobūdį ir ribotą taikymo sritį“, – sakė debesų saugos įmonės „Netskope“ vyriausiasis skaitmeninės ir informacijos pareigūnas Mike'as Andersonas.

 

     Yra smulkiu šriftu: mokesčiai atleidžiami, tik jei įmonės nutraukia santykius su „Google Cloud“. Atleidimas neapima, pavyzdžiui, duomenų perkėlimo iš „Google Cloud“ į „Amazon Web Services“ ar į kitą, ką analitikai vadina „šventuoju graliu“ vienu metu naudojant kelis debesies paslaugų teikėjus.

 

     „Aukščiausiu lygmeniu tai gali būti suvokiama, kaip būdas pašalinti debesies perjungimo mokesčius“, – sakė Shawnas Michelsas, debesijos konkurentės „Akamai Technologies“ debesijos produktų valdymo viceprezidentas. "Tačiau tai tikrai nepadeda kai kurioms naujos kartos paskirstytoms programoms, kuriose daug duomenų."

 

     Taip pat neįtraukiamos išlaidos, susijusios su duomenų perkėlimu į turinio pateikimo tinklus, pvz., „Akamai“, kurie dirba užkulisiuose, kad greičiau apdorotų daug duomenų turinčius tinklalapius. Klientai privalo kreiptis dėl kredito, kuris padengia mokesčius, ir privalo perkelti savo duomenis praėjus 60 dienų po sutarties pabaigos – tai didelis užsakymas tiems, kurie turi petabaitų duomenų.“ [1]

 

1. Google Cloud Cuts Fee As Oversight Increases. Lin, Belle.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 23 Jan 2024: B.4.

Google Cloud Cuts Fee As Oversight Increases


"A decision by Google's cloud-computing unit to eliminate certain data fees highlights continuing complexities of cloud pricing as businesses seek to cut tech costs. The move coincides with greater regulatory oversight of cloud competition but may not go far enough to satisfy some critics.

Google Cloud this month removed fees customers pay to move their data out of its cloud platform and into another provider or a data center -- becoming the first among major cloud providers to do so. Such fees fall under the category of "data egress" costs, which include moving data across regions, cloud services and other providers, and are common practice among major cloud providers.

"We wanted to take that off the table, because we believe that if customers want to move out of Google Cloud Platform and they find a better provider, they should be able to do that easily, quickly, without any kind of cost," said Amit Zavery, a vice president and head of platform for Google Cloud.

The move comes amid increasing audits of cloud bills by cost-conscious chief information officers, and growing scrutiny of cloud competition by regulators. To both, charging data fees can amount to an anticompetitive practice because they reach tens of thousands to millions of dollars for massive amounts of data, thereby deterring companies from using multiple cloud platforms or switching providers.

Google's change was welcomed by some CIOs, who say they often encounter restrictive pricing practices and licensing fees from enterprise tech vendors. "Now that they give you a pathway out, which other providers aren't giving you yet, it is a differentiator to me," said Rob Zelinka, CIO of financial technology firm Jack Henry & Associates. The Monett, Mo.-based company uses multiple cloud providers including Google Cloud.

But others say the Alphabet company's change does little to address bigger cloud pricing challenges, such as surprise cloud bills and the cost of managing multiple cloud platforms.

"While this offer presents a possible cost-saving opportunity and increased flexibility, it's crucial to recognize its conditional nature and limited scope," said Mike Anderson, chief digital and information officer of cloud security firm Netskope.

There is fine print: Fees are waived only if companies end their relationship with Google Cloud. The waiver doesn't include the cost of moving data between Google Cloud and Amazon Web Services, for instance, which is what analysts call the "holy grail" setup of using multiple cloud providers at the same time.

"At the highest level, it can be thought of as a way to remove cloud switching fees," said Shawn Michels, vice president of product management for cloud at Akamai Technologies, a cloud competitor. "But it really doesn't help with some of the next-generation, distributed data-heavy applications."

Also excluded are the costs of moving data in and out of content-delivery networks like Akamai, which work behind the scenes to process data-heavy web pages more quickly. Customers are required to apply for credit that covers the fees, and must move their data 60 days after the contract ends -- a tall order for those with petabytes of data." [1]

1. Google Cloud Cuts Fee As Oversight Increases. Lin, Belle.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 23 Jan 2024: B.4.