Defense Industrial Complex: There is massive investment in the current, heavy-armored, status quo. The defense industry and its congressional allies have huge economic incentives to maintain current procurement programs.
Political Inertia: Changing from a heavy-armor-centric force to a drone-centric one threatens the largesse and political careers of those tied to traditional weapons systems.
Long Production Cycles: Developing and producing new military equipment takes years, meaning that investments made today reflect the doctrine and capabilities of yesterday.
“David Petraeus's op-ed is spot on ("America's Success Against Iran May Prove a Distraction," April 16). The trouble is that the defense industrial complex is hard-wired against the changes of which he speaks. He's placing considerable influence in the defense industry space, alongside many others who understand how far behind we are in reforming our military's procurement process.
Smart people know what needs to be done, but a myriad of powerful influences stand in the way.
The defense industry and their congressional cohorts have hundreds of billions of dollars invested in the status quo, and change represents a threat to this largesse and their political careers.
Our military is interested in making the changes, but the civilians who provide the funding, along with those who build the equipment, stand as systemic impediments to the pace of change that is required to protect our nation.
Capt. Pete Gurney USNR (Ret.)
Aliso Viejo, Calif.” [1]
1. Fixing a Civilian Chokehold. Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 18 Apr 2026: A12.
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą