Sekėjai

Ieškoti šiame dienoraštyje

2025 m. sausio 24 d., penktadienis

Biotech Venture Investors Bullish, but Worries Persist --- Funding for startups rose last year, yet fewer of them are drawing investment


"Biotechnology venture capital is recovering from its slide and investors are expressing optimism about 2025, even as they confront uncertainties weighing on their industry.

U.S. and European biotech venture funding climbed to $28.1 billion in 2024 from $21.2 billion the prior year, according to HSBC Innovation Banking, which works with startups and venture investors.

Biotech initial public offerings rose from 11 in 2023 to 18 last year, and mergers and acquisitions of private, venture-backed biotechs in which at least $75 million was paid up front increased from six in 2023 to 17 last year, the highest total since the 20 M&As in 2020, according to HSBC.

The outlook for biotech M&A is encouraging because drugmakers need to fill gaps from medicines coming off patent, the overhang from the presidential election is gone and inflation is more under control, said Roel van den Akker, principal, pharmaceutical and life science deals leader, for PricewaterhouseCoopers U.S.

"If you have a more-stable and predictable environment it's likely that we're going to see people lean into dealmaking a bit more in '25 than perhaps we've seen over the past two years," he said.

Last week, Johnson & Johnson agreed to buy publicly held Intra-Cellular Therapies, for $14.6 billion, and GSK said it would pay up to $1.15 billion to purchase venture-backed IDRx.

"We have been talking about cautious optimism for the last two years," said Arda Ural, EY Americas life sciences sector leader. "We can finally drop the 'cautious.'"

The recovery, however, is uneven and new headwinds could slow it.

Most biotechs that went public last year have traded down since their IPOs, and biotech stocks are essentially flat over the past year, two factors clouding the outlook for IPOs in 2025. And with the potential for new tariffs that might push inflation higher, some observers are tempering their optimism.

"I think things look really good, but I do have concerns regarding the macroeconomic policies that could impact biotech investing through inflationary results," said Robert Williamson, president, acting chief executive and director of venture-backed biotech company Triumvira Immunologics.

Investors have responded to uncertainty by placing what appear to be surer bets, channeling more money to fewer companies.

Biotech venture financings fell to 569 last year from 573 in 2023, and financings of $100 million or more -- megarounds -- grew 70% from 2023 to 106 deals in 2024, according to HSBC.

As capital markets constricted in 2022 and 2023, venture firms tended their own portfolios, propping up companies with insider rounds. By last year, firms were ready to focus more on new investments, but often favored startups led by repeat entrepreneurs who could raise giant financings to target big markets.

Megarounds reduce the risk of startups running short of cash and enable management to concentrate more on their businesses and less on fundraising. They also concentrate capital on the best science and management teams, proponents say.

Companies raising such large rounds are less likely to be acquired early on because few drugmakers are willing to pay giant sums for an early-stage company, some observers say.

Another effect of mega-rounds, raised through large investor syndicates, is that many venture portfolios start to look the same, said Jonathan Norris, a managing director with HSBC Innovation Banking.

This could complicate venture firms' efforts to stand apart when pitching their next fund to limited partners (LPs), he said.

"That is a cause for concern down the road," Norris added. "It doesn't feel like LPs are making more commitments to more venture funds. If anything, they're winnowing."

The trend toward sizable financings for startups in hot sectors, such as obesity, often excludes companies outside those sectors and startups pursuing innovative but still emerging science, some say.

"When you're going after a novel target that's yet to be proven in the clinic or the risk around it is perceived to be higher, it's been a very difficult fundraising environment," said Stan Abel, CEO of biotech startup ProJenX. "I'm optimistic that will start to change in 2025. There's good science out there that needs funding to advance into the clinic."

Megarounds have continued this year, but relatively few companies can command such large financings. As the year unfolds, more investors will return to backing startups raising smaller early-stage financings, said John Flavin, CEO of venture investor Portal Innovations.

 

"Those megarounds will work their way through the system," Flavin said. "There will be more attractive opportunities for the normalization of these earlier-stage, seed-through-Series A rounds."

Despite short-term struggles, biotech's long-term outlook remains bright because innovation is accelerating, investors say. For example, after years of investment and research, drugmakers recently developed new drugs for conditions such as schizophrenia, said Jonathan Behr, partner at Dementia Discovery Fund, which is operated by SV Health Investors.

"The quality and the state of innovation continues to be impressive," Behr added.” [1]

1.  Biotech Venture Investors Bullish, but Worries Persist --- Funding for startups rose last year, yet fewer of them are drawing investment. Gormley, Brian.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 24 Jan 2025: B6.   

 

Housing Shortage Is Biggest Obstacle, Zillow CEO Says

 

"A housing market in the doldrums has been hurt by volatile mortgage rates, but a severe shortage of available homes is the most critical obstacle for would-be buyers, Zillow Group Chief Executive Jeremy Wacksman said.

"Homes are just not trading nearly as much as they could, which contributes to making it tougher for buyers," Wacksman said in an interview Thursday.

Zillow estimates the U.S. housing market is short by about 4.5 million homes.

Regulatory hurdles and other obstacles to development at the local level stymie growth in home supplies, and many areas are struggling to make housing affordable. New challenges may arise if President Trump fulfills pledges to raise tariffs and removes millions of undocumented immigrants, many of whom work in construction.

"Not to oversimplify, but you really can boil the housing affordability crisis down to an availability crisis," Wacksman said. "Getting more homes available is going to be ultimately what starts to unstick the housing market."

Years of underdevelopment following the Great Recession reduced the number of opportunities to become a homeowner. The issue was exacerbated during the pandemic when a buying spree inflated home prices, and later on efforts to tame higher inflation that sent mortgage rates sharply higher. These high mortgage rates -- once again above 7% -- have discouraged people who otherwise might want to sell the houses they own.

Wacksman, who became CEO of the home-listing site in August, said this means that, even if interest rates are cut and mortgage rates follow suit, buyers still face limited choices.

This was reflected by the sale of only about 4 million homes last year, compared with 5.5 million to 6 million sales in a more normalized environment, Wacksman added.

Zillow's economists forecast a slight increase in home sales and more modest home price appreciation in 2025.

Baked into its outlook is little to no action by the Federal Reserve that would bring down mortgage rates.

"You're going to need to see more than one or two rate cuts to really see the mortgage market move. And that'll help on the margin with affordability," Wacksman said.

But any subsequent demand would run into limited supply, potentially pushing prices higher and offsetting any benefits from a cut, he added.” [1]

1.  Housing Shortage Is Biggest Obstacle, Zillow CEO Says. Denny, Jacob.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 24 Jan 2025: B4.  

Trumpas suteikia Europos lyderiams dingstį atsisakyti blogos politikos


 

 „Nenoriu prisišaukti bėdą, bet Donaldo Trumpo antroji kadencija yra gera pradžia – Europai. Ponas Trumpas jau sukūrė didžiules politines ir ekonomines galimybes žemynui, jei ir tai yra didžiulis “jei”, jei Europos politikai turės proto pasinaudoti jų galimybe.

 

 Pirmadienį prasidėjus vykdomųjų įsakymų ir kitų veiksmų pūgai, už Atlanto ypač svarbūs keturi dalykai. Trumpo administracija pasitraukia iš 2015 m. Paryžiaus susitarimo dėl klimato, panaikina Bideno eros elektrinių transporto priemonių mandatus, padidina Amerikos iškastinio kuro gamybą ir panaikina pasaulinį įmonių mokesčių susitarimą.

 

 Pirmasis įsitvirtinusių Europos politikų ir jų žiniasklaidos įgalintojų instinktas yra interpretuoti šiuos žingsnius, kaip įžeidimus Europai. Kokie jie ir yra. D. Trumpo atsisakymas dešimtmetį galiojusio pasaulinio klimato susitarimo yra toks pat stiprus signalas, kokį Vašingtonas gali pasiųsti, kad naujajai administracijai nerūpi problema, kurią europiečiai suprato kvazireligiškai. Visi žadėti gręžimai ir nauji vidaus degimo automobiliai dar labiau įžeidžia šią traumą. Pasitraukimas iš didelio susitarimo dėl mokesčių, dėl kurio buvo susitarta Ekonominio bendradarbiavimo ir plėtros organizacijoje, rodo, kad naujoji administracija abejinga Europos vyriausybių desperatiškoms naujų pajamų šaltinių paieškoms.

 

 Tačiau atkreipkite dėmesį, kad ponas Trumpas bent jau nebeišsaugo kur kas didesnio prezidento Bideno įžeidimo mūsų draugams Europoje: nemeluoja jiems.

 

 Bidenas elgėsi taip, tarsi Amerikoje būtų politinis sutarimas, palaikantis europiečiams patinkančią politiką, o jos akivaizdžiai nebuvo. Demokratas vėl prisijungė prie Paryžiaus klimato susitarimo, nepaisant to, kad Senatas daugelį metų atsisakė jį ratifikuoti ir D. Trumpas pirmą kartą bandė iš jo pasitraukti. Bideno administravimo taisyklės dėl energijos gamybos ir elektrinių transporto priemonių įgaliojimų buvo aiškiai ir nuspėjamai nepopuliarios. Jo iždo sekretorė Janet Yellen pasirašė EBPO susitarimą dėl mokesčių, nepaisant to, kad Vašingtone abi partijos pasipriešino panašiems visuotiniams mokesčių pasiūlymams.

 

 Kiekvienu atveju „Bideno komanda“ paskatino Europos vyriausybes veikti, darant prielaidą, kad ši politika tęsis, o JAV jai pritarė visuomenė. Dėl to žemynas priėmė daugybę su klimatu susijusių įgaliojimų, subsidijų, mokesčių ir panašių dalykų, kurie, geriausiu metu, yra mažai prasmingi ir yra gyvybingi – galbūt, vos vos – tik tuo atveju, jei Amerika imsis to paties ekonominio savęs sabotažo. Europos lyderiai investavo daug politinės energijos, kad pasaulinis mokesčių paktas būtų pritaikytas Europos teisei, ir atrodo, kad jie tikisi būsimų pajamų.

 

 Europiečiai turėjo žinoti geriau, nei pasitikėti ponu Bidenu, bet tai visai nesvarbu. Visuomenės parama Europoje kovos su klimato kaita priemonėms ir didelių JAV įmonių apmokestinimui tebėra didelė, nepaisant pastarojo meto susilpnėjimo klimato srityje. Kuris Europos politikas galėtų atlaikyti tą politinį spaudimą, kai Europos rinkėjai manė, kad Amerika prisijungia prie jų prioritetų? O kuris lyderis galėtų atvirai suabejoti JAV pareigūnų, sėdinčių kitoje stalo pusėje, pasaulio viršūnių susitikimuose, sąžiningumu?

 

 D. Trumpas, nepaisant viso jo, kaip sąjungininko, nenuoseklumo, bent jau dabar Europai sako tiesą apie Ameriką. Tai yra geriausia, ką bet kuris JAV vadovas gali padaryti jiems.“ [1]

 

1. Political Economics: Trump Gives European Leaders an Excuse to Dump Bad Policies. Sternberg, Joseph C.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 24 Jan 2025: A15.