"WASHINGTON — President Biden has
promised to use trade policy as a tool to mitigate climate change. This
weekend, the administration provided its first look at how it plans to mesh
those policy goals, saying the United States and the European Union would try
to curb carbon emissions as part of a trade deal
covering steel and aluminum.
The arrangement, which American and
European leaders aim to introduce by 2024, would use tariffs or other tools to
encourage the production and trade of metals made with fewer carbon emissions
in places including the United States and European Union, and block dirtier
steel and aluminum produced in countries including China.
If finalized, it would be the first
time a U.S. trade agreement includes specific targets on carbon emissions, said
Ben Beachy, the director of the Sierra Club’s Living Economy program.
“No U.S. trade deal to date has even
mentioned climate change, much less included binding climate standards,” said
Mr. Beachy.
The announcement was short on
details, and negotiations with European leaders are likely to face multiple
roadblocks. But it provided an outline for how the Biden administration hopes
to knit together its concerns about trade and climate and work with allies to
take on a recalcitrant China, at a time when progress on multicountry trade
negotiations at the World Trade Organization has stalled.
“The U.S. leads the world in our
clean steel technology,” Gina Raimondo, the secretary of commerce, said in an
interview on Monday. She said the United States would work with allies “to
preference cleaner steel, which will create an incentive to make more
investments in technology,” resulting in fewer carbon emissions and more jobs.
In the same interview, Katherine
Tai, the United States Trade Representative, said the potential agreement would
restrict market access for countries that don’t meet certain carbon standards,
or that engage in nonmarket practices and contribute to global overcapacity in
the steel sector — accusations that are often levied at China.
The effort would seek to build “a
global arrangement that promotes not just fair trade in steel but also
pro-climate and responsible trade in steel,” Ms. Tai said.
Kevin Dempsey, the president of the
American Iron and Steel Institute, said at an industry forum in Washington on
Tuesday that the arrangement would be “positive for the U.S. industry,” which
has the lowest carbon intensity per ton of steel of the major steel-producing
countries.
China accounts for nearly 60 percent
of global steel production. Its use of a common steel-production method causes
more than twice as much climate pollution as does the same technology in the
United States, according to estimates by Global
Efficiency Intelligence.
In its announcement on Saturday, the
Biden administration also said it had reached a deal to ease the
tariffs that former President Donald J. Trump had imposed on European metals
while the governments work toward the carbon accord.
The United States would replace the
25 percent tariff on European steel and a 10 percent tariff on European
aluminum with a so-called tariff-rate quota. In return, the European Union
would drop the retaliatory tariffs it imposed on other American products, like
bourbon and motorcycles.
Under the new terms, 3.3 million
metric tons of European steel would be allowed to enter the United States
duty-free each year, with any steel above that volume subject to a 25 percent
tariff.
European producers would be allowed
to ship 18,000 metric tons of unwrought aluminum, which often comes in the form
of ingots, and 366,000 metric tons of wrought or semifinished aluminum into the
United States each year, while volumes above that would be charged a 10 percent
tariff, the commerce department said.
To qualify for zero tariffs, the
steel must be entirely made in the European Union — a provision designed to
keep cheaper steel from countries including China and Russia from finding a
backdoor into the United States via Europe.
Supporters of free trade have
criticized the Biden administration for relying on the same protectionist trade
measures used by the Trump administration, which deployed both tariffs and
quotas to protect domestic metal makers.
Jake Colvin, the president of the
National Foreign Trade Council, said the announcement would ratchet down trade
tensions between the United States and Europe. But he called the trade barriers
“an unwelcome form of managed trade” that would add costs and undermine
American competitiveness.
Ms. Tai said the administration had
made a deliberate choice not to heed calls “for the president to just undo
everything that the Trump administration had done on trade.”
Mr. Biden’s plan, she said, “is that
we formulate a worker-centered trade policy. And that means not actually going
back to the way things were in 2015 and 2016, challenging us to do trade in a
different way from how we’ve done it earlier, but also, critically, to
challenge us to do trade in a way different from how the Trump administration
did.”
The focus on carbon emissions
differs from that of the Trump administration, which rejected any attempts to
negotiate on carbon mitigation and withdrew the United States from the Paris
Agreement on climate change.
But negotiations with Europe will
face challenges, among them developing a common methodology for measuring how
much carbon is emitted as certain products are made. Still, the announcement
suggests that the United States and Europe might be ready to work toward a collaborative
approach on lowering carbon emissions, despite past differences on how the
problem should be addressed.
European leaders have long advocated
an explicit price on the carbon dioxide that companies emit while making their
products. In July, the European Union proposed a carbon border adjustment mechanism
that would require companies to pay for carbon emissions produced outside
Europe, to discourage manufacturers from evading Europe’s restrictions on
pollution by moving abroad.
An explicit tax on carbon has met
with more resistance in the United States, where some politicians want to
update regulatory requirements or put the onus on companies to invest in
cleaner production technology.
Todd Tucker, the director of
governance studies at the Roosevelt Institute, said the latest announcement
suggested that the European Union may be “a little bit more flexible” on how
the United States and other partners would go about lowering emissions. Mr.
Biden’s reconciliation bill, for example, contains a proposal for a “green
bank” that could provide financing for firms to transition to cleaner
technologies, he said.
“If the U.S. ends up achieving
decarbonization through more of an investments and industrial-policy approach,
it seems like they’re OK with that,” Mr. Tucker said.
Though the earliest negotiations
over carbon emissions in the steel sector involve the European Union, the Biden
administration says it wants to quickly extend the partnership to other
countries.
In twin announcements on Sunday, the
Department of Commerce said it had begun close consultations with Japan and the
United Kingdom “on bilateral and multilateral issues related to steel and
aluminum,” with a focus on “the need for like-minded countries to take
collective action.”
Both Japan and the United Kingdom
still face a 25 percent tariff on steel exports to the United States imposed by
Mr. Trump.
The talks suggest a template for how
the Biden administration will try to engage allies to counter China’s growing
economic heft and make progress on goals like climate and workers rights.
The administration has rejected Mr.
Trump’s “America First” approach to trade, saying the United States needs to
work with like-minded countries. But they have also acknowledged that the
inefficiency of negotiations at the World Trade Organization, and distanced
themselves from broader, multicountry trade deals, like the Trans-Pacific
Partnership.
The announcements suggest that the
Biden administration may not see comprehensive trade deals as the most
effective way to accomplish many of its goals, but rather, industry-specific
agreements among a limited number of democratic, free-market countries. That
approach is similar to the cooperation the United
States announced with the European Union for the civil aircraft
industry in June.
Ms. Raimondo said the agreement to
ease the tariffs on the European Union was a “very significant achievement”
that would help to alleviate supply chain problems
and lower prices for companies that use steel and aluminum to make other
products.
“It’s all kind of a table setter to
a global arrangement, whereby we work with our allies all over the world over
the next couple of years,” she said."
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą