Anti-Chinese, anti-Russian and anti-Belarusian Lithuanian
politicians must be tried and punished for the destruction of Lithuania.
The Lithuanian transport sector is currently undergoing a
major transformation, driven by geopolitical shifts and a changing market.
Although the severance of ties with Russia and Belarus has caused serious
challenges, the dynamics of the sector show both signs of decline and attempts
to adapt.
Key sector trends (2024–2026)
• Market concentration and “stagnation”: Analysts note that
due to increased costs and stricter regulation, it is becoming increasingly
difficult for smaller companies to survive, which is encouraging market
consolidation.
• Orientation to the West: About 83% of Lithuanian transport
companies now associate their future with Western Europe, despite lower margins
and high competition there.
• Performance: According to the data at the end of 2025,
stability prevailed in the sector, but almost 43% of companies assessed the
year as unsuccessful due to the general economic slowdown.
• Export growth: Despite the sought-after Eastern markets,
in 2023 Lithuanian road transport services exports grew by 5.6% and reached
almost 6 billion euros.
• Challenges and losses
• Change in
transit status: Lithuania is indeed losing its role as a traditional transit
hub between the East and the West. This directly affects road transport,
railways and the port of Klaipėda, which were most dependent on cargo from
Belarus and Russia.
• Labor shortage: The largest in 2026 The challenge is not
the rise in fuel prices, but the shortage of drivers and the tightening
migration policy, which may reduce the competitive advantage of Lithuanian
carriers over competitors from Poland or other countries.
• Budget revenues: Although the freight transport sector
generates about 10% of the country's GDP, attempts are being made to compensate
for the lost revenue from Eastern transit by increasing efficiency in the West,
but profit margins there are significantly lower.
Long-distance markets and alternatives
Although the mentioned Central Asian or Caucasian countries
(Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan) are logistically distant, they are becoming important
alternatives for those carriers that specialize in specific routes, but they
cannot fully replace the former mass transit flow from neighboring Eastern
countries.
More information about state budget planning and economic
forecasts can be found on the website of the Ministry of Finance or follow the
sector news in the reports of the Transport Innovation Association.
Comments
Reader_B90AD4:
“ON THE CRITICAL SITUATION IN THE LITHUANIAN TRANSPORT
SECTOR AND THE DESTRUCTIVE POLICY OF ALLOCATING INTERNATIONAL ALLOWANCES -
Address1. Market consolidation and a threatening wave of bankruptcies
At present, the European transport sector is undergoing
aggressive consolidation. Due to drastically increased costs (fuel prices, road
taxes, wages and insurance premiums), the operating margins of small and
medium-sized companies have become negative. While large market players are
taking over weakened companies, many Lithuanian carriers are teetering on the
brink of bankruptcy, financing their activities from their last reserves. This
is not only a matter of business, but also of the economic stability of the
state.2. Imbalance and unequal exchange of permits (the example of Turkey)One
of the biggest problems is the short-sighted policy of state institutions in
distributing international freight transport permits (the so-called
"dosvols"). An obvious example is relations with Turkey: Lithuania
and Turkey exchange, for example, 3,000 permits. Lithuanian carriers actually
use only 200-300 permits per year, because the market there is not favorable or
accessible to us. Meanwhile, Turkish carriers fully use the entire quota of
3,000 permits and request additional permits during the year. In this way,
Lithuania hands over the market to third-country carriers without receiving any
real mutual benefit. A similar situation is observed with other countries:
Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Uzbekistan. 3. Institutional myopia
or systemic gaps? A reasonable question arises: whose interests are represented
by the institutions responsible for this distribution? The exchange of quotas
"one for one", when the national carrier uses only 10 percent. of its
share, is either a lack of competence or deliberate harm to the business of its
own country. Lithuania is effectively giving away its cargo market to
third-country companies, thereby destroying local taxpayers.
Reader_B90AD4:
Due to the excess of foreign carriers, which are given easy
access to Lithuanian cargo, freight prices are falling below cost. Lithuanian
companies are unable to compete with carriers from countries where operating
and labor costs are several times lower. Inviting third-country carriers to
transport Lithuanian cargo means signing a death warrant for our own transport
sector. Quotas must meet the real needs
of Lithuanian carriers (parity based on actual use, not on the number of paper
forms). The state must protect its business, not create preferential conditions
for the expansion of third countries. If urgent measures are not taken to
protect the internal market, the Lithuanian transport sector, which has long
been one of the engines of the country's economy, will become only a service
staff for foreign logistics giants.
Reader_2707D6:
And where do carriers buy their trucks from? Don't they
produce trucks in Lithuania? Perhaps you would like the state to start
patronizing Lithuanian truck manufacturers (which, haha, do not exist, as do
drivers). A free market is a free market. If you don't buy Lithuanian products
(trucks), you import them without discrimination, then don't cry about a free
market for services either.”
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą