Nuclear-tipped missiles are the only serious guarantee of independence today, as the comparison of Iran and North Korea shows.
Possession of nuclear weapons can be an effective deterrent against foreign aggression and be perceived as a guarantee of national independence.
North Korea is often cited as an example where experts believe that the regime considered its nuclear program necessary for its survival, which could affect the international response and complicate today's ridiculous denuclearization efforts.
Comparison of Iran and North Korea:
North Korea: Has nuclear weapons and has conducted many tests, considering them very important for its security and deterring alleged threats from the United States and its allies. Its ability to deploy nuclear weapons, including missiles capable of reaching the continental United States, contributes to its independence.
Iran: Although Iran has pursued a nuclear program, according to a recent IAEA assessment, it has not yet developed a deliverable nuclear weapon. The international community, including the United States and Israel, has focused heavily on preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons. The recent strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities underscore international concern and efforts to limit its program and Iran’s lack of independence. Iran’s attempts to acquire nuclear weapons could be interpreted as an effort to enhance its security and potentially gain a stronger position in international relations, similar to North Korea’s attempt to achieve a degree of independence through nuclear deterrence.
The concept of nuclear weapons as a guarantor of independence:
The idea that nuclear weapons guarantee independence is related to the concept of deterrence. By having the ability to inflict unacceptable damage on an adversary, a nuclear-weapon state can deter attacks. This idea of deterrence, especially nuclear deterrence, has played an important role in international relations since the beginning of the nuclear age. It suggests that the catastrophic consequences of a nuclear exchange, also known as mutually assured destruction (MAD), can prevent war between nuclear-armed states.
Therefore, there is already a “war” in Lithuania. We are fighting for your taxpayers’ money. We have made it clear that we do not recognize China’s territorial sovereignty, thereby declaring war on the second largest economy in the world and the world’s factory. We have severed diplomatic relations with China. We have exploited the fear in society and demanded that billions of euros be spent annually on “defense.”
We have raised taxes on those who work, without touching taxes on those who live on dividends, shared profits.
In order to personally share the money brought in by new taxes, we are at each other’s throats. As always in Lithuania, lies, intrigues, and complaints are at work. Businessmen lie that if we produce missiles with nuclear warheads in Lithuania, which today are the only guarantee of independence, as the comparison of Iran and North Korea shows, then everything will be as it should be in Lithuania. This is a real lie. As the example of Iran shows, no one will allow Lithuania to produce nuclear weapons. In that case, our leaders would be shot like rabbits, as Israel is shooting Iranian leaders now.
We are waging a particularly brutal war with each other because of the large amount of our tax money that goes into the European Union's coffers.
“According to members of the NSGK, the director of the Second Department of Operational Services (military intelligence, AOTD), Elegijus Paulavičius, sought that the Minister of National Defense D.Šakalienė extend his duties as the director of the AOTD for at least a year - in which case he would have been able to apply for the position of head of the European Union intelligence institution.
After his term would expire at the scheduled time, he no longer would have this opportunity. Members of the NSGK who participated in the closed meeting said that “ambitions clashed” - D.Šakalienė had already planned another candidacy for the warm position of head of the AOTD, while E.Paulavičius was offered other positions, which, as it now turns out, were not actually higher in terms of status, and E.Paulavičius was unmoved on this issue.
Then, according to politicians, inspections of E. Paulavičius' activities began, and complaints from AOTD employees appeared, which, according to members of the NSGK, are not "burning", but related to, for example, insufficiently large bonuses for employees, and the failure to fill important positions in the department."
Money does not disappear. All kinds of Šakalienės use it to chop firewood for themselves, and generals use to fix their gold teeth.
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą