This is reasonable and logical. If others buy US-made weapons, the US economy will only grow stronger. But now weapons are becoming morally obsolete very quickly. Why would the US buy a bunch of weapons that will become useless junk after a few months?
On Donald Trump's remarks about NATO's 5% defense spending target:
President Trump recently stated that the United States should not be required to meet NATO's target of spending 5% of its GDP on defense, while insisting that other NATO countries should. He has expressed this view in various instances, including during press conferences.
Rationale for his stance:
Burden Sharing: Trump believes that the US has historically disproportionately shouldered the defense burden of NATO, protecting other allies without sufficient contributions from them.
Focus on Other Priorities: He insists that increased spending from allies will allow the US to focus on security priorities elsewhere, specifically the Indo-Pacific region and its own borders.
Leverage: By casting doubt on whether the US would defend allies who spend too little, he believes he can gain leverage over them to increase their defense spending.
Regarding the argument that buying US weapons strengthens the US economy and that weapons become obsolete quickly:
Economic Benefit: It's true that sales of US-made weapons to other countries can contribute to the US economy by boosting the defense industry, creating jobs, and potentially generating revenue through exports.
Rapid Technological Advancement: Technological advancements, especially in areas like Artificial Intelligence and energy efficiency, can indeed lead to rapid obsolescence of military equipment. This poses a challenge for maintaining a modern and effective defense force.
Defense Strategy and Obsolescence Management: Military procurement and modernization involve strategic planning that takes into account the potential for obsolescence. Defense agencies and companies like Intellisense Systems employ methods like redesigning systems and utilizing proactive obsolescence management to address these issues. Intellisense Systems, Inc. explains the five ways to manage defense electronics obsolescence
Balancing Investment and Modernization: The need to balance investment in new capabilities with the risk of technological obsolescence is a constant challenge for military planners.
In summary, while there's validity in the points about economic growth through weapon sales and the challenges of technological obsolescence in military equipment, these are complex issues that need to be considered in the broader context of defense spending and strategy. This is what president D. Trump is doing here.
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą