"“Not widely known is that for many years after the Great Crash
of 1929, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) viewed buybacks as
bordering on criminal activity,” Edward Yardeni and Joseph Abbott, of the
independent firm Yardeni Research, wrote in their book, “Stock Buybacks: The
True Story.”
The authors say the growth of buybacks is partly an
unintended consequence of a change in the tax code in 1993 under President Bill
Clinton that put a $1 million cap on chief executives’ salaries. Ever
inventive, corporations accelerated the issuance of stock options and grants as
a form of executive compensation.
As The New York Times has documented over many years, such grants have widened a pay gap with rank-and-file
employees, creating billionaires in the executive suite.
When stock is issued this way to corporate executives and
ordinary employees, the stake of existing shareholders is diluted. Say, for
example, you own 1 out of 100 shares in a small company. After 10 new shares
are issued to company employees, you will own only 1/110th of the company.
But the company remedies that dilution with buybacks. That
prevents the value of your shares from declining. When the buybacks are greater
— reducing the total shares to, say, 90 — the value of your shares increases."
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą