"A new study bolsters the idea that
the first animals were surprisingly complex, perhaps equipped with muscles and
a nervous system.
One of the greatest transformations
in the history of life occurred more than 600 million years ago, when a
single-celled organism gave rise to the first animals. With their multicellular
bodies, animals evolved into a staggering range of forms, like whales that
weigh 200 tons, birds that soar six miles into the sky and sidewinders that
slither across desert dunes.
Scientists have long wondered what
the first animals were like, including questions about their anatomy and how
they found food. In a study published on Wednesday,
scientists found tantalizing answers in a little-known group of
gelatinous creatures called comb jellies. While the first animals remain a
mystery, scientists found that comb jellies belong to the deepest branch on the
animal family tree.
The debate over the origin of
animals has endured for decades. At first, researchers relied largely on the
fossil record for clues. The oldest definitive animal fossils date back about 580 million years,
although some researchers have claimed to find even older ones. In 2021, for
example, Elizabeth Turner, a Canadian paleontologist, reported finding 890-million-year-old fossils of possible
sponges.
Sponges would make sense as the oldest animal.
They are simple creatures, with no muscles or nervous system. They
anchor themselves to the ocean floor, where they filter water through a maze of
pores, trapping bits of food.
Sponges are so simple, in fact, that it can come as a
surprise that they are animals at all, but their molecular makeup reveals their
kinship. They make certain proteins, such as collagen, that are produced only
by animals. What’s more, their DNA shows they are more closely related to
animals than to other forms of life.
Starting in the 1990s, as scientists
gathered DNA from more animal species, they tried to draw the animal family tree.
In some studies, the sponges ended up on the deepest branch of the tree. In
this scenario, animals evolved a nervous system only after the sponges branched
off.
But in the early 2000s, other scientists came to a
surprisingly different conclusion. They found that the deepest branch of
animals were comb jellies — slim, oval creatures that often
grow a distinctive set of iridescent bands that flicker in the darkness of
the deep ocean.
Many experts were reluctant to accept that conclusion,
because it meant animal evolution was weirder than they had realized. For one
thing, comb jellies were not as simple as sponges. They have a nervous system:
A web of neurons circling their bodies controls their muscles.
To resolve the
comb-jelly-versus-sponge debate, researchers from around the
world collected DNA from more species of ocean animals. And instead
of looking at single genes, researchers figured out how to sequence entire
genomes.
But the avalanche of new data failed
to settle the debate. Some scientists ended up assembling a tree in which
sponges were the deepest branch, while others ended up with comb jellies.
The new study, published in the
journal Nature, relied on a new method for using DNA to track animal
evolution.
In previous studies, scientists
looked at how certain mutations arise in different animal branches. A mutation
may cause a single genetic letter, known as a base, to switch to a different
letter. That mutation will then be inherited by an animal’s descendants.
But these mutations can be unreliable
markers of history. A base may switch from one letter to another, and then
millions of years later, it may switch back to the original one. Alternatively,
the same base may switch to the same letter in two unrelated lineages. That
parallel evolution creates the illusion that the two lineages are closely
related.
In the new study, Darrin Schultz, an evolutionary biologist
at the University of Vienna, and his colleagues looked instead at a different
kind of genetic change. On rare occasion, a huge chunk of DNA will get
accidentally moved from one chromosome to another.
This massive mutation is less likely to deceive scientists.
The odds that precisely the same chunk of DNA moves to precisely the same
location a second time is astronomically low. It’s also next to impossible for
that chunk to move back to exactly the spot from which it came.
“It’s direct evidence of something
that happened,” Dr. Schultz said.
His team tracked the movements of genetic material in the
chromosomes of nine animals, along with three single-celled relatives of
animals. They found a number of chunks of DNA in precisely the same spot in the
genomes of sponges and other animals. But these chunks were in a different
position in comb jellies and single-celled relatives of animals. That finding
led Dr. Schultz and his colleagues to conclude that comb jellies split off from
other animals first.
“It’s a fresh look with a fresh
approach to the question,” said Antonis Rokas, an evolutionary biologist at
Vanderbilt University, who was not involved in the study.
In a 2021 study, Dr. Rokas and his
colleagues also came down in favor of comb jellies. He said the new
analysis provided a strong confirmation.
“I’ve learned not to ever say the
debate is over,” Dr. Rokas said. “But this moves the needle.”
The study raises intriguing new possibilities for what the
common ancestor of living animals looked like. If comb jellies, with a nervous
system and muscles, are the deepest branch on the animal tree, then early
animals may have not been simple and spongelike. They had nervous systems and
muscles too. Only later did sponges abandon their nervous system.
Dr. Schultz cautioned against
thinking of comb jellies as living fossils, unchanged since the dawn of
animals. “Something that’s alive today can’t be the ancestor of something alive
today,” he said.
Instead, researchers are looking now
to comb jellies to see how similar and different their nervous systems are from
those of other animals. Recently, Maike Kittelmann, a cell biologist at Oxford
Brookes University, and her colleagues froze comb jelly larvae so that they
could get a microscopic look at their nervous system. What they saw left them
baffled.
Throughout the animal kingdom, neurons are typically
separated from one another by tiny gaps called synapses. They can communicate
across the gap by releasing chemicals.
But when Dr. Kittelmann and her
colleagues started to inspect the comb jelly neurons, they struggled to find a
synapse between the neurons. “At that point, we were like, ‘This is curious,’”
she said.
In the end, they failed to find any synapses between them.
Instead, the comb jelly nervous system forms one continuous web.
When Dr. Kittelmann and her
colleagues reported their findings last
month, they speculated yet another possibility for the origin of
animals. Comb jellies may have evolved their own weird nervous system
independently of other animals, using some of the same building blocks.
Dr. Kittelmann and her colleagues
are now inspecting other species of comb jellies to see if that idea holds up.
But they won’t be surprised to be surprised again. “You have to assume
nothing,” she said."
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą