The situation mentioned here is related to the Industrial
Accelerator Act, presented by the European Commission on 4 March 2026, which
sets strict conditions for foreign investors in strategic sectors.
Here are the key facts about these new rules:
Mandatory technology transfer: Large investments (over €100
million) from countries that control more than 40% of global production
capacity in a given area (e.g. China in solar energy or battery production)
will have to generate value in the EU through mandatory technology and know-how
transfer.
Ownership restrictions: In strategic sectors such as
electric cars or critical raw materials, foreign entities will not be able to
have a controlling stake – their ownership will be limited to 49%.
‘Buy European’ requirements: Local content requirements are
set to receive state support or participate in public procurement. For example,
in electric cars, at least 70% of the value of components (excluding battery
cells) will have to be produced in the EU.
Jobs: Investors will have to ensure that at least 50% of
employees are EU citizens.
Why is the EU doing this?
Brussels is seeking to protect its industry from dependence
on China and increase the share of manufacturing in EU GDP from 14.3% to 20% by
2035. This is a response to similar protectionist measures by the US and China.
What are the risks?
Some EU
countries (e.g. Sweden, Czech Republic) warn that such strict rules could deter
investment, slow down innovation and raise prices for consumers.
“The European Union (EU) on Wednesday unveiled rules for its
“Buy European” initiative to boost domestic manufacturing, which Brussels says
will help protect European companies from fierce global competition,
particularly from China.
“What I am presenting to you today is more than just a
change in operating procedures. It is a change in doctrine that was unthinkable
just a few months ago,” said Stephane Sejourne, the EC’s executive vice-president
for prosperity and industrial strategy.
The European Commission said the package aims to increase
the share of manufacturing in EU GDP to 20% by 2035, up from around 14% in
2024.
Brussels estimates that around 600,000 jobs are at risk over
the next decade if the EU’s industrial decline continues at the current pace.
Increasing the EU’s competitiveness has become particularly
urgent in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine, when
soaring energy prices exposed the Community’s vulnerability to supply shocks.
The “Made in Europe” measures planned last year have been
postponed several times due to disagreements over their scope within the
European Commission and among member states.
The Commission has proposed that companies wishing to
receive public funds will have to meet minimum requirements for EU-made parts
in “strategic sectors” that will include cars, green technologies and
“energy-intensive” industries such as aluminium and steel.
For example, electric car manufacturers will have to ensure
that at least 70% of their car components are produced in the EU in order to
receive public funds, according to a draft document that is still subject to
change.
The proposal will have to be approved by EU member states
and the European Parliament.
Its supporters argue that if the EU does not protect its
strategic sectors, it will have no industry to defend. But sceptics, including
the EU's biggest economy, Germany, say Europe can support domestic industry by
introducing a "Made in Europe" principle that would involve the
bloc's trading partners.
The future rules are unpopular outside the EU, with
countries such as Britain, Canada, Japan and Turkey fearing they will be too
restrictive.
Foreign investment screening
According to the draft document, the proposal, known as the
"Industrial Accelerator Act", aims to ensure that foreign companies
looking to set up in the EU and gain better access to its market work with
European companies.
To achieve this, foreign investments exceeding €100 million
in "emerging strategic sectors" such as batteries and electric vehicles
are subject to certain conditions. They apply when the investor is from a
country that has more than 40% of the relevant global production capacity - an
implicit reference to China's dominance in these sectors.
In order for such projects to be implemented, foreign
investors must meet certain conditions, including the requirement to employ at
least 50% of EU workers, to hold no more than 49% of the shares of the EU
company concerned and to transfer technological know-how.
“If access to the EU market is one of the most valuable
industrial assets in the world, it is legitimate to set conditions that
strengthen European capabilities,” said the Paris-based Institut Montaigne
spokesman Joseph Dellatte, rejecting criticism that the plans are
“protectionism”.
The measures are among many the EU is considering to
implement in a bid to regain its competitive edge.
Also read: ‘Buy European’ plan: Europe divided in two seeks
balance between protection and competition
The EU will also propose this month a pan-European legal
framework for innovative start-ups, which it says will make it easier to do
business by reducing the time it takes to set up a company in the 27 countries.
Many see the plans as necessary to boost the EU’s green
technology development.
The aim is to ensure that EU taxpayers’ money is “used
strategically to strengthen Europe’s industrial base, not to subsidise China’s
overcapacity”, said Neil Makaroff, a climate research centre.
But some experts say that if the EU wants to combat what it
sees as unfair competition, Brussels has other tools.”
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą