Sekėjai

Ieškoti šiame dienoraštyje

2026 m. kovo 6 d., penktadienis

You Can’t Do Anything without Industry, Which Is Now in China: Pentagon Races to Secure Cash for Iran Operations, Munitions --- Requests to Congress and push to boost weapons production explored

 

Producers of munitions know the drill: Voters get tired of wars and big expenses, during the elections kick out of power the party, running them, and the money goes again to pensions and other social needs. Producers of munitions are left holding useless bag of factories that are getting obsolete quickly. This is the basis of their hesitation during a war.

 

The scenario described—where munitions producers hesitate to rapidly expand capacity due to the cyclical "boom and bust" nature of defense procurement—is accurate and documented as a major factor in the defense industrial base, particularly in the United States and NATO allies.

 

The Basis of Hesitation: "Boom and Bust" Cycles

 

    Volatile Demand: During high-intensity conflicts, demand for weapons spikes, but during peacetime, only a small fraction of capacity is needed for training and maintenance.

    Risk of Stranded Assets: Manufacturers are reluctant to invest in new, expensive factories or increase production lines if they believe the demand will vanish after a conflict, leaving them with, as mentioned above, "useless bags of factories".

    Specialized Workforce: The industry relies on highly specialized labor that is difficult to retain during down cycles.

    Post-Cold War Habits: Following the Cold War, the defense industry, particularly in the U.S., prioritized "just-in-time" efficiency over "just-in-case" surge capacity, creating a system that cannot quickly adapt to large-scale, prolonged wars.

 

Current Evidence

 

    Production Lags: During the conflict in Ukraine, major ammunition producers in the U.S. and Europe were slow to ramp up production of 155mm artillery shells, largely because they awaited long-term, guaranteed government contracts before committing to investments.

    Stockpile Depletion: Because of this hesitation to maintain excess capacity, NATO allies were forced to draw down their own stockpiles, creating a "munitions gap".

    Industry Viewpoint: The captains of the defense industry are constantly weighing the immediate, intense need for weapons against the long-term risk of overbuilding capacity.

 

Counter-Trends in 2025-2026

 

    Long-Term Contracts: Due to the persistence of conflict (e.g., Ukraine, potential tensions in Asia), governments are now offering more long-term, multi-year contracts to encourage investment, shifting toward a "security supercycle" where, for some companies, this volatility is being mitigated.

    Rapid Innovation: The industry is focusing more on AI and drone technology, which might make some older, traditional manufacturing plants obsolete faster, shifting the focus of investment.

 

While manufacturers do hesitate, the current, prolonged nature of recent conflicts has forced a shift toward rebuilding capacity, though the fear of a rapid "peace dividend" return still looms, as we see below:

 

“Pentagon officials are drawing up plans to replenish U.S. munitions expended fighting Iran over the past week, according to people familiar with the matter, a step in the Trump administration's efforts to drastically increase the number of missiles made each year.

 

Lawmakers in Congress and defense-industry officials are expecting a funding request from the Pentagon to pay for costs associated with the war. The funding would support the purchase of Patriot, Tomahawk and Thaad missile systems, which have been in heavy use since the U.S. and Israel began their strikes, the people said.

 

Recent fighting in the Middle East burned through stockpiles for some of those weapons. That added a new challenge for the Defense Department, which is wrestling with how to pay for a war with an indefinite end date.

 

It is also facing an industrial base that was stretched to meet current demand and potential threats from China.

 

The conflict in the Middle East continued to escalate on Thursday, with Israel saying it started another wave of large-scale strikes on Tehran and struck Hezbollah command centers in Beirut, while Iran fired more missiles toward Israel and hit its northern neighbor, Azerbaijan, the latest nation to be dragged into the war. Azerbaijan promised a response.

 

Admiral Brad Cooper, the Central Command chief, said U.S. forces attacked the headquarters of the regime militia that is "targeting the protesters" and urged Iranians to stay inside.

 

Meanwhile the State Department closed the U.S. Embassy in Kuwait on Thursday, after suspending operations on Tuesday and previously advising Americans in Kuwait to shelter in place. The embassy on Thursday urged U.S. citizens to leave the country if possible to do so safely. Nearly 20,000 Americans have returned to the U.S. from the Middle East since the conflict began, according to State Department spokesman Dylan Johnson. In a statement on Thursday, Johnson said those figures don't include U.S. citizens who fled to other countries or are in transit.

 

President Trump pledged in January that the next defense budget would reach $1.5 trillion, a roughly $500 billion increase from current levels.

 

"The U.S. military has more than enough munitions, ammo, and weapons stockpiles to achieve the goals of Operation Epic Fury laid out by President Trump -- and beyond," White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said. She said that the president "will continue to call on defense contractors to more speedily build American-made weapons, which are the best in the world."

 

A Defense Department spokesman declined to comment, and referred questions about a spending request to the White House Office of Management and Budget.

 

Trump administration officials spent months pressuring big defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and RTX to triple or quadruple their annual production of their most advanced missiles.

 

The Pentagon launched an effort last year to accelerate production of missiles and other equipment to boost thin domestic stockpiles. Officials in June summoned more than a dozen top weapons makers to urge them to invest early in production increases. Steve Feinberg, deputy defense secretary, held weekly calls with some company chief executives for several months to drive the point home.

 

Executives responded with new investments but warned that production isn't as simple as building more factories. The asked-for production boosts depend on smaller contractors within the supply chain.

 

"We've been working this problem set on munitions supply long before this conflict," said Michael Duffey, the Pentagon's top official for procuring missiles and other weapons, in a House committee hearing on Wednesday. "We're going as fast as we possibly can."

 

The White House summoned top defense-industry executives from companies including Boeing, Lockheed Martin and RTX to a meeting on Friday, people familiar with the plans said. Feinberg hosted a call with company leaders in advance of the meeting with Trump, some of the people said.

 

The first four days of strikes against Iran are estimated to have cost nearly $11 billion, according to an analysis by Elaine McCusker, a top Pentagon budget official under the first Trump administration. The estimate for Operation Epic Fury includes the cost to position more than a dozen ships and 100 aircraft in the Middle East from bases in the U.S. and Europe since late December.

 

The Pentagon has likely fired about $5.7 billion of interceptors to shoot down Iranian ballistic missiles and drones and $3.4 billion for bombs and other types of missiles, McCusker said. The cost estimate doesn't include pay, training or the use of national assets in the region.

 

Top government officials have acknowledged the strain the Iran conflict has put on critical resources, like interceptors used to shoot down missiles. In a social-media post on Monday, Trump called U.S. stockpiles of medium- and upper-medium-grade weaponry "virtually unlimited" but acknowledged the most expensive hardware is in high demand. "At the highest end, we have a good supply, but are not where we want to be," Trump wrote.

 

Late last year, Pentagon officials asked Congress for a $28 billion funding surge to pay for the future weapons contracts. Appropriators bristled at the last-minute request and only provided about $8 billion in supplemental funding, leaving a roughly $20 billion gap.” [1]

 

 

1. Pentagon Races to Secure Cash For Iran Operations, Munitions --- Requests to Congress and push to boost weapons production explored. Weisgerber, Marcus; FitzGerald, Drew.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 06 Mar 2026: A1.  

Zelensky Declares War on EU, Vows Terrorist Attacks on EU Leader. EU Says Zelensky's Threats to Orban Unacceptable

 

 

If a promise to kill a leader is not a declaration of war, then we are losing our understanding of what war is. Zelensky's Western-armed "guys" in Ukraine are a danger to us all. Zelensky is blowing up tankers in allparts of the world.

 

In early March 2026, tensions between Ukraine and Hungary reached a critical level due to disputes over the Druzhba oil pipeline and the blocking of EU support for Ukraine. V. Zelensky on March 5 delivered incredibly dire personal warnings to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, which Budapest officially denounced as death threats.

 

Here are the key facts about the situation:

 

Zelensky’s threats: At a press conference on March 5, Zelensky said that if Hungary continued to block a 90 billion euro tranche of EU aid, he would hand over the person’s (Orbán’s) address to the Ukrainian armed forces so that they could “speak to him in their own language.”

 

Hungarian reaction: Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó called these words a “death threat” on March 6 and stressed that Hungary would not succumb to blackmail. Orban has said that the Ukrainian president has “declared open war” on him and is targeting him personally in an attempt to remove him from power before elections in late March.

 

Context: The conflict escalated after Ukrainian strikes damaged Russia’s Druzhba oil pipeline in late January, with Hungary accusing Ukraine of deliberately delaying repairs and using an “energy blockade” as a means of pressure.

 

If it feels like a TV show, it is: 

 

“The European Union (EU) on Friday condemned as unacceptable Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s threat to Hungarian leader Viktor Orban, amid a heated row over suspended Russian oil supplies.

 

“We as the European Commission are saying very clearly that such language is unacceptable. There can be no threats to EU member states,” spokesman Olof Gill told reporters, denouncing “inflammatory rhetoric” as unhelpful.

 

Brussels is holding talks to resolve the impasse that has led Orban to suspend a €90 billion EU loan to Ukraine, demanding that Kyiv first restore the damaged Druzhba oil pipeline, Gill said.

 

“Our goal here is to get everyone to calm down a bit, tone down the rhetoric and achieve” common goals, he added.

 

Zelensky said on Thursday that the pipeline could be operational in four to six weeks, although he personally would prefer not to resume transit.

 

“We hope that one person in the European Union will not block 90 billion (euros) (...). Otherwise, we will pass on this person’s contacts to our armed forces, to our guys. Let them call him and talk to him in their own language,” Zelensky said.”

 

 


Zelenskis paskelbė karą Europos Sąjungai, pažadėdamas teroristinius išpuolius prieš vieną iš Europos Sąjungos vadovų. Europos Sąjunga teigia, kad Zelenskio grasinimai Orbanui yra nepriimtini

 

 

Jei pažadas užmušti vadovą yra ne karo paskelbimas, tai mes prarandame supratimą, kas yra karas. Vakarų apginkluoti, "Zelenskio vaikinai" Ukrainoje yra pavojus mums visiems. Zelenskis sprogdina tanklaivius visose pasaulio dalyse.

  

2026 m. kovo mėn. pradžioje įtampa tarp Ukrainos ir Vengrijos pasiekė kritinį lygį dėl ginčų dėl naftotiekio „Družba“ ir ES paramos Ukrainai blokavimo. V. Zelenskis kovo 5 d.  išsakė neįtikėtinai baisius asmeninius perspėjimus Vengrijos premjerui Viktorui Orbanui, kuriuos Budapeštas oficialiai pasmerkė, kaip grasinimus gyvybei

.

Štai pagrindiniai faktai apie šią situaciją:

 

    V. Zelenskio grasinimai: Kovo 5 d. spaudos konferencijoje V. Zelenskis pareiškė, kad jei Vengrija toliau blokuos 90 mlrd. eurų ES paramos tranšą, jis perduos to asmens (V. Orbano) adresą Ukrainos ginkluotosioms pajėgoms, kad šios „pasikalbėtų su juo jų pačių kalba“.

 

    Vengrijos reakcija: Vengrijos užsienio reikalų ministras Péteris Szijjártó kovo 6 d. šiuos žodžius pavadino „grasinimu nužudyti“ ir pabrėžė, kad Vengrija nepasiduos šantažui. V. Orbanas pareiškė, kad Ukrainos prezidentas jam „paskelbė atvirą karą“ ir taikosi į jį asmeniškai, siekdamas nušalinti nuo valdžios prieš, kovo pabaigoje vyksiančius, rinkimus.

 

   

    Kontekstas: Konfliktas paaštrėjo po to, kai sausio pabaigoje Ukrainos smūgiai apgadino Rusijos „Družba“ naftotiekį, o Vengrija apkaltino Ukrainą tyčia delsiant jį sutaisyti ir naudojant „energetinę blokadą“, kaip spaudimo priemonę.

 

Jei tai atrodo, kaip televizijos serialas, tai ir yra televizijos serialas: 

 

“Europos Sąjunga (ES) penktadienį pasmerkė, kaip nepriimtiną Ukrainos prezidento Volodymyro Zelenskio grasinimą Vengrijos lyderiui Viktorui Orbanui, aštrėjant ginčui dėl sustabdytų Rusijos naftos tiekimų.

 

„Mes, kaip Europos Komisija, labai aiškiai sakome, kad tokia kalba yra nepriimtina. Negali būti jokių grasinimų ES valstybėms narėms“, – žurnalistams teigė atstovas spaudai Olofas Gillas (Olofas Gilas), pasmerkdamas „kurstančią retoriką“, kaip nenaudingą.

 

Briuselis veda derybas siekdamas išspręsti aklavietę, dėl kurios V. Orbanas sustabdė 90 mlrd. eurų ES paskolą Ukrainai, reikalaudamas, kad Kyjivas pirmiausia atnaujintų pažeisto naftotiekio „Družba“ darbą, sakė O. Gillas.

 

„Mūsų tikslas čia yra priversti visus šiek tiek nusiraminti, sušvelninti retoriką ir pasiekti“ bendrų tikslų, pridūrė jis.

 

V. Zelenskis ketvirtadienį teigė, kad naftotiekis galės pradėti veikti tik po keturių ar šešių savaičių, nors asmeniškai jis mieliau neatnaujintų tranzito.

 

„Tikimės, kad vienas asmuo Europos Sąjungoje neblokuos 90 mlrd. (eurų) (...). Priešingu atveju, mes perduosime šio asmens kontaktus savo ginkluotosioms pajėgoms, savo vaikinams. Tegul jie jam paskambina ir pasikalba su juo savo kalba“, – sakė V. Zelenskis.”

 


2026 m. kovo 5 d., ketvirtadienis

599 USD kainuojančio, „MacBook Neo“ privalumai ir trūkumai


„APPLE“ trečiadienį pristatė naująjį „MacBook Neo“, kurio kaina – 599 USD. Tai istoriškai žema kaina bendrovei. „Neo“ bus galima įsigyti nuo kovo 11 d., o išankstiniai užsakymai pradėti vakar.

 

Naujasis „MacBook“ kainuoja kiek daugiau nei perpus pigiau nei šią savaitę pristatytas „M5 MacBook Air“.

 

Privalumai

 

Jame yra daug funkcijų, kurių pirkėjai ieškotų „Apple“ nešiojamajame kompiuteryje: tvirtas aliuminio korpusas ir du USB-C prievadai. „Apple“ netgi teigia, kad jo baterija veikia iki 16 valandų – keliomis valandomis mažiau nei „MacBook Air“.

 

Atnaujinę modelį iki 699 USD, galite gauti „Touch ID“ saugiai prieigai ir „Apple Pay“.

 

Jis yra vos storesnis nei „MacBook Air“ (ir tokio pat svorio), yra keturių spalvų: sidabrinės, indigo, rausvos „raudonos“ ir naujosios gelsvai žalios „citrusinės“ – o klaviatūros yra suderintos spalvos.

 

Trūkumai

 

Didžiausia problema yra ta, kad „MacBook Neo“ veikia su mažiau galingu lustu „A18 Pro“ – tai ankstesnės kartos procesorius, kuriuo buvo maitinamas „iPhone 16 Pro“. Lustas palaiko „Apple Intelligence AI“ funkcijas, tačiau kai kuriose užduotyse gali būti nepakankamai geras.

 

Jo 13 colių ekranas yra šiek tiek mažesnis ir turi mažiau funkcijų nei „Air“, o prie jo galima prijungti tik vieną išorinį 4K monitorių.

 

„FaceTime“ kameros raiška yra 1080p, panaši į senesnių „MacBook Air“ kompiuterių, bet ne tokia gera, kaip naujesnių 12 megapikselių kamerų su „Center Stage“ funkcija, kurias dabar turi perkamiausi „Air“ modeliai. Ji turi du garsiakalbius, o ne keturių garsiakalbių masyvą, kaip „Air“.

 

Klaviatūra neturi foninio apšvietimo.

 

699 USD kainuojantis modelis ne tik prideda „Touch ID“, bet ir padvigubina vidinę atmintį nuo 256 GB iki 512 GB. Tačiau RAM negalima atnaujinti: ji fiksuota ties 8 GB.

 

Baigiamosios mintys

 

Su „MacBook Neo“ „Apple“ nustato naują nešiojamųjų kompiuterių linijos pagrindą. Bazinė „iPad“ su klaviatūra taip pat prasideda nuo 599 USD. Su juo galite atlikti stebėtinai daug darbo, bet ne tiek, kiek su „Mac“.

 

Tai skirta palyginti su aukštesnės klasės „Chromebook“. Šie švietimui skirti nešiojamieji kompiuteriai gali kainuoti iki 800 USD (nors ir vos 100 USD). Kai kurių „Windows“ nešiojamųjų kompiuterių kainos yra panašiame diapazone.“ [1]

 

1. The Pros and Cons of the $599 MacBook Neo. Nguyen, Nicole.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 05 Mar 2026: A11.  

The Pros and Cons of the $599 MacBook Neo


“APPLE UNVEILED the new MacBook Neo on Wednesday with a price tag of $599. That's historically low for the company. The Neo is available March 11, with preorders starting yesterday.

 

The new MacBook is just over half the price of the M5 MacBook Air, also announced this week.

 

Pros

 

It has many of the features shoppers would look for in an Apple laptop: a sturdy aluminum case and two USB-C ports. Apple even says it gets up to 16 hours of battery life, a few hours shy of the MacBook Air.

 

If you upgrade to the $699 model, you can get Touch ID for secure access and Apple Pay.

 

It's just a hair thicker than the MacBook Air (and the same weight) and comes in four color options: silver, indigo, the pinkish "blush" and new lime-green "citrus" -- and the keyboards are color-coordinated.

 

Cons

 

The biggest thing is that the MacBook Neo runs on a less powerful chip, the A18 Pro, a previous-generation processor that powered the iPhone 16 Pro. The chip supports Apple Intelligence AI features, but might fall short in some tasks.

 

Its 13-inch screen is a bit smaller and has fewer features than the Air's, and you can only attach a single external 4K monitor.

 

The FaceTime camera has a resolution of 1080p, similar to what's on older MacBook Airs but not as good as the newer 12-megapixel cameras with Center Stage that the top-selling Airs have now. It has two speakers, instead of the Air's four-speaker array.

 

And the keyboard doesn't have backlighting.

 

The $699 model not only adds Touch ID but also doubles the internal storage from 256GB to 512GB. However, you can't upgrade the RAM: It's fixed at 8GB.

 

Final thoughts

 

With the MacBook Neo, Apple is establishing a new baseline for its laptop line. A basic iPad-plus-keyboard also starts at $599. You can do a surprising amount of work on it, but not as much as on a Mac.

 

This is meant to square off against higher-end Chromebooks. Those education-focused laptops can cost up to $800 (though also as low as $100). And some Windows PC laptops are priced in a similar range.” [1]

 

1. The Pros and Cons of the $599 MacBook Neo. Nguyen, Nicole.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 05 Mar 2026: A11.  

Ar „Anthropic“ gali sudaryti taiką su Pentagonu?

 

Pranešama, kad dirbtinio intelekto startuolis atnaujino derybas su Gynybos departamentu dėl savo įrankių naudojimo, o abiem pusėms tai kelia didelį pavojų.

 

Andrew čia. Muilo opera tarp Pentagono, „Anthropic“ ir „OpenAI“ tęsiasi. Ir kyla klausimas, ar kova labiau susijusi su politika, o ne su dirbtinio intelekto saugumu.

 

„Anthropic“ generalinis direktorius Dario Amodei nutekintame vidiniame pranešime garsiai pasakė tyliąją dalį, teigdamas, kad Pentagonas taikosi į bendrovę, nes „mes neaukojome Trumpui“ ir kad „mes negirėjome Trumpo diktatoriaus stiliumi (o Samas tai padarė)“.

 

Kad „OpenAI“ siekė įtraukti griežtesnes sąlygas į savo sutartį su Pentagonu, o šis žingsnis, regis, taip pat kenkia vyriausybės argumentams, kodėl ji atsisakė sudaryti susitarimą su „Anthropic“. Daugiau informacijos rasite žemiau.

 

Grįžtate prie derybų stalo?

 

Praėjus mažiau nei savaitei po to, kai gynybos sekretorius Pete'as Hegsethas pagrasino iš esmės įtraukti dirbtinio intelekto bendrovę „Anthropic“ į juodąjį sąrašą, Pentagonas atnaujino derybas dėl jos modelių naudojimo, praneša „The Financial Times“ ir „Bloomberg“.

 

Bet kokios atnaujintos derybos yra labai svarbios „Anthropic“. Jos verslui iškiltų didelė grėsmė, jei išsipildytų pirminis Hegsetho grasinimas. Pentagonui taip pat kyla daug statymų.

 

Neaišku, kaip abi šalys gali pasiekti kompromisą. Pentagonas pabrėžė, kad, jo manymu, jam turėtų būti leista naudoti dirbtinio intelekto įrankius „bet kokiam teisėtam naudojimui“, nors jis galėtų sutikti su tam tikromis apsaugos priemonėmis dėl masinio stebėjimo ir autonominių ginklų. Jis atkreipia dėmesį į susitarimą, kurį jis pasiekė su „OpenAI“ – kurį, pasak „OpenAI“ generalinio direktoriaus Samas Altmanas, išsprendė tokius klausimus kaip „Anthropic“.

 

Tačiau aštriame memorandume, išsiųstame penktadienį „Anthropic“ darbuotojams, apie kurį pirmiausia pranešė „The Information“, sakoma, kad „Anthropic“ generalinis direktorius Dario Amodei teigė, jog „OpenAI“ sutartis, regis, paliko Pentagonui daug spragų. „OpenAI“ ir Pentagono aprašymai apie jų sandorį skambėjo kaip „80 procentų saugumo teatras“, rašė jis, pridurdamas, kad tai iš esmės davė departamentui tai, ko jis norėjo.

 

Šią savaitę Altmanas pripažino pradinės „OpenAI“ sutarties trūkumus ir paskelbė, kad jo įmonė susiderėjo dėl to, ką jis pavadino griežtesnėmis apsaugos priemonėmis.

 

Ar nugalės šaltas protas? Praėjusią savaitę Hegsethui nutraukus derybas su „Anthropic“, deryboms vadovavęs Pentagono pareigūnas Emilis Michaelas pavadino Amodei „melagiu“ su „Dievo kompleksu“.

 

Ir Amodei gali tekti paaiškinti griežtą kalbą tame vidiniame pranešime, ypač savo teiginius, kad Pentagono priešiškumas kilo dėl to, kad „mes neaukojome Trumpui“ ir kad „mes negirėjome Trumpo diktatoriaus stiliumi (o Samas tai padarė)“.

 

„Anthropic“ rizikuoja daug. Pranešama, kad bendrovės metinės pajamos pasiekė 20 mlrd. JAV dolerių, daugiau nei dvigubai, palyginti su gruodžio pabaiga, po to, kai smarkiai išaugo jos „Claude“ modelių naudojimas versle.

 

Tačiau galimybė, kad jai bus uždrausta bendradarbiauti su vyriausybės rangovais (su kuo „Anthropic“ kovos teisme), gali sumažinti šį pelną. (Keletas gynybos rangovų jau atsisako „Claude“.)

 

Tai svarbu ir Pentagonui. Iki šiol „Claude“ buvo vienintelė dirbtinio intelekto priemonė, leidžiama naudoti jos įslaptintose sistemose, ir, kaip pranešama, ji buvo naudojama karinėse operacijose Venesueloje ir Irane.

 

Vyriausybės pareigūnai teigė, kad „Claude“ yra geresnė už kai kurias alternatyvas, ir pripažino, kad „Anthropic“ priemonių pašalinimas iš jų operacijų bus sudėtinga užduotis.“ [1]

 

1. Can Anthropic Make Peace With the Pentagon?: DealBook Newsletter. Andrew Ross Sorkin; Warner, Bernhard; Kessler, Sarah; Michael J. de la Merced; Gallogly, Niko; et al.  New York Times (Online) New York Times Company. Mar 5, 2026.

Can Anthropic Make Peace With the Pentagon?


“The artificial intelligence start-up has reportedly resumed talks with the Defense Department over use of its tools, with high stakes for both.

 

Andrew here. The soap opera between the Pentagon, Anthropic and OpenAI continues. And an emerging question is whether the fight is less about A.I. safety and more about politics.

 

Dario Amodei, Anthropic’s C.E.O., said the quiet part out loud in a leaked internal memo, suggesting the company was being targeted by the Pentagon because “we haven’t donated to Trump” and that “we haven’t given dictator-style praise to Trump (while Sam has).”

 

That OpenAI has sought to add stricter terms to its own contract with the Pentagon, a move that also appears to undermine the government’s argument about why it refused a deal with Anthropic. More below.

 

Back to the negotiating table?

 

Less than a week after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threatened to essentially blacklist the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, the Pentagon has resumed talks about using its models, The Financial Times and Bloomberg report.

 

Any renewed talks carry high stakes for Anthropic. Its business faces a dire threat if Hegseth’s original threat comes to pass. Stakes are high for the Pentagon, too.

 

It’s unclear how the two sides can compromise. The Pentagon has stressed that it believes it should be allowed to employ A.I. tools for “any lawful use,” though it could agree to some safeguards on mass surveillance and autonomous weapons. It points to a deal it reached with OpenAI — one that Sam Altman, OpenAI’s C.E.O., said addressed concerns like Anthropic’s.

 

But in a blistering memo sent to Anthropic employees on Friday, first reported by The Information, Dario Amodei, Anthropic’s C.E.O., argued that the OpenAI contract appeared to have left the Pentagon plenty of loopholes. OpenAI and the Pentagon’s descriptions of their deal sounded like “80 percent safety theater,” he wrote, adding that it basically gave the department what it wanted.

 

Altman acknowledged flaws in OpenAI’s original contract this week, and announced that his company had negotiated what he called stronger safeguards.

 

Will cooler heads prevail? After Hegseth cut off talks with Anthropic last week, Emil Michael, the Pentagon official who led the negotiations, called Amodei a “liar” with a “God complex.”

 

And Amodei may have to explain strong language in that internal memo, notably his assertions that the Pentagon’s animus was because “we haven’t donated to Trump” and that “we haven’t given dictator-style praise to Trump (while Sam has).”

 

Anthropic has a lot on the line. The company’s annual revenue run rate has reportedly hit $20 billion, more than doubling where it was in late December, after a surge in business adoption of its Claude models.

 

But the prospect of being barred from any business with government contractors — which Anthropic has said it will fight in court — could decimate those gains. (Several defense contractors are already dropping Claude.)

 

It’s a big deal for the Pentagon, too. Until recently, Claude was the only A.I. tool allowed into its classified systems, and it was reportedly used in the military operations in Venezuela and Iran.

 

 Government officials have said Claude is better than some alternatives, and have acknowledged that removing Anthropic tools from their operations will be a messy task.” [1]

 

1. Can Anthropic Make Peace With the Pentagon?: DealBook Newsletter. Andrew Ross Sorkin; Warner, Bernhard; Kessler, Sarah; Michael J. de la Merced; Gallogly, Niko; et al.  New York Times (Online) New York Times Company. Mar 5, 2026.