"The real story of this parliamentary election is the
capitulation of the liberal bourgeoisie to the extreme right. The Sweden
Democrats will now probably have a say in the fate of the country, but they are
anything but a normal party.
That's it. A moment ago Sweden was, in its own image and
that of many outsiders, a beacon among nations: a humanitarian superpower, the
home of equality and the welfare state, an impregnable bastion of tolerance and
humanity.
Anyone who took a closer look could see that the rosy
Bullerby dreams had long been little more than transfiguration, that Sweden was
in the process of transforming itself into a country like many others. But
since Sunday's election, Sweden has suddenly become more extreme than the
others.
Nowhere in western Europe is the extreme right stronger today than in
Sweden.
The right-wing populist Sweden Democrats (SD), once founded
by old and neo-Nazis, have left all bourgeois parties behind and are the
second-strongest party in the country. Above all, however, the bourgeois have
made the SD, which they had just avoided, into partners. And now they are
preparing to have a say in the fate of the country. Turn of the tide in
Swedish.
Ulf Kristersson, leader of the bourgeois moderates, is now
celebrating the election victory. He will probably be Sweden's next prime
minister - and yet he is duped, a loser too: Kristersson had to let the
right-wing populists outdo him in his own camp.
The Social Democrats have recently done little politics
good for the workers
There are many factors that have favored the rise of the
Sweden Democrats. There is the self-deception of the Swedes about their own
uniqueness, which went hand in hand with denying the darker sides of Swedish
history as well.
There are the failings of the Social Democrats: recently
they have hardly done any politics for the workers, the weak. And they simply
overwhelmed their people by taking in more asylum seekers per capita than any
other Western country, especially since they then failed to set the course for
successful integration. And when gang crime escalated in the suburbs, they made
the mistake of leaving the issue exclusively to the Sweden Democrats for a long
time.
And yet the real story of this election is the capitulation
of the liberal bourgeoisie to the far right - out of power calculations. It is
the story of a trap they set themselves, as has happened so many times
elsewhere: the story of bourgeois parties choosing to embrace right-wing
populist movements for power gain, only to be amazed to discover at the end
that it was the extreme right is the one who wins this little dance.
In order to justify breaking the taboo, Sweden's bourgeoisie
not only pretended that the Sweden Democrats were a normal party, they even
praised them for their harsh rhetoric on foreigners. But once the stigma is
gone, many choose the original rather than the copy.
But that is fatal for democracy, because the Sweden
Democrats are not just that: a normal party. They are no longer a Nazi party,
but a party of extreme nationalism hostile to many aspects of liberal
democracy. At heart they are a revolutionary party: they want a different
Sweden, and they want it tomorrow. They have a vision of their very own cop,
rave about Viktor Orbán's Hungary, dream of a Sweden of good, white-skinned,
Christian family people, free from criminal foreigners and the dictates of
foreign powers. Also free from critical media. Linus Bylund,
chief of staff of the SD, called journalists "enemies of the people"
a few years ago. Asked on election night what he was looking forward to, Bylund
said: "Journalist rugby".
The ideas and language of the right seeped into the
mainstream
The Sweden Democrats have already changed Sweden. They drove
the others "like in a downward spiral," wrote the liberal Dagens
Nyheter. When the far right is de-tabooed, its language and inhumanity slowly
seep into the mainstream. During the election campaign, the parties outdid each
other with proposals to dismantle the rule of law in the service of fighting
crime. In the end, even Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson warned of
"Somalitowns" as a threat. DN stated "a brutalization of the
public".
So far, Ulf Kristersson's plan has looked like this: His
citizens can be elected and tolerated by the SD. Formally, the party and its
leader, Jimmie Åkesson, are to remain outside of government and merely assume
the role of a support party. But now the right-wing populists are bursting with
power. Well, said Svenska Dagbladet, who is generally well-disposed towards the
bourgeoisie, one could also see it this way: "Ulf Kristersson will become
prime minister in Jimmie Åkesson's government". The winner of the Swedish
election is on the far right.”
The conclusion is that all Swedish society as a whole has shifted towards the extreme right. Even the reigning Prime Minister tried to do this, but was too late and lost power.
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą