Sekėjai

Ieškoti šiame dienoraštyje

2026 m. vasario 27 d., penktadienis

Western European Leaders Are Political Enemies of America: U.S. Envoys Ruffle Feathers By Interfering in Western Europe --- Diplomats step into sensitive political debates, drawing the ire of leaders

 


 

Recent tensions, driven by shifting U.S. foreign policy and trade threats, have led some analysts and officials to characterize the relationship between Western European leaders and the current U.S. administration as increasingly adversarial.

 

While traditional, deep-seated alliances remain, disagreements over trade, defense spending, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict have strained ties.

 

    Trade and Economic Conflict: European leaders have criticized U.S. tariff threats as "commercial blackmail," with some suggesting the EU should suspend existing trade deals in response.

    Shifting Alliances: Some European leaders are moving toward greater independence from the U.S. security umbrella, partly due to concerns over reliability.

 

    Political Ideology: The rise of populist, right-wing, and anti-immigrant politics in both the U.S. and some European nations has created a complex, often polarized, relationship. This how they use diplomatic language to characterize it.

 

    Public Perception: A 2025 survey indicated that a significant portion of Europeans view the Trump administration as a threat to their interests. Their leaders are pushing these ideas on them. This is a propaganda war too.

 

"Cultivating Resistance": The 2025 National Security Strategy indicates a shift in focus toward "cultivating resistance to Europe's current trajectory," with reports suggesting an ideological conflict between the U.S. administration and the European model of democracy.

Allied Reaction: European leaders are increasingly, though sometimes privately, viewing the U.S. as a disruptive force, leading to calls for increased European strategic autonomy in defense.

"Hard Leverage": The approach is viewed by some in Washington as a necessary form of "hard leverage" to force European nations to align more with U.S. priorities, such as increased defense spending and border control.

 

“PARIS -- President Trump's diplomats increasingly are willing to chastise Europeans in public. The response from authorities here has been sharp: Mind your own business.

 

In recent weeks, Trump administration envoys have waded into some of Europe's most sensitive political debates, demanding action to counter far-left violence, migration and antisemitism.

 

In the latest flare-up, the X account of the U.S. Ambassador to France, Charles Kushner, posted that the killing of a far-right activist this month in Lyon showed how the far-left was a threat to public order. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot summoned Kushner to a meeting in protest.

 

In a breach of diplomatic protocol, Kushner didn't show up.

 

"We do not accept that foreign countries and foreign authorities should invite themselves into our national political debate," Barrot said.

 

Trump's envoys have cast aside decades of tradition that call for diplomats to avoid meddling -- at least publicly -- in the politics of their host country.

 

As the guarantors of European security, U.S. officials have long prodded European politicians on various issues -- but usually behind closed doors and rarely with the bluntness of Trump's diplomats.

 

The criticism has added an irritant to a trans-Atlantic relationship that is on its shakiest ground since World War II. Coming after Trump's demands for Greenland and his tariffs on Europe, the diplomats' combativeness has contributed to the sense that the U.S. is no longer an ally.

 

The State Department said it is Trump's right to have ambassadors who advance his America First agenda.

 

On Wednesday, the U.S. drew criticism from U.K. lawmakers over a visit by far-right activist Tommy Robinson to the State Department. Robinson has organized large rallies in the U.K. opposing migration. He met with Joe Rittenhouse, a senior adviser for the department's Consular Affairs bureau, who called Robinson a "free speech warrior" in a post on X about the meeting.

 

U.K. Labour lawmaker Phil Brickell told Politico that the visit was an outrage given that Robinson has "peddled racist tropes." The State Department said Robinson visited the department in an unofficial capacity. Robinson didn't respond to a request for comment.

 

U.S. diplomats often are echoing the views of Europe expressed by senior administration figures such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Vice President JD Vance and Trump himself, who say the continent is being dragged down by mass migration, "woke" ideology and excessive regulation.

 

The U.S. shift has been jarring, coming from Europe's closest historic ally. Earlier this month, the U.S. ambassador to Belgium, Bill White, accused the government of antisemitism for investigating mohels, specialists in ritual Jewish circumcision, who potentially lacked medical training required by the state.

 

"MUST DROP THE RIDICULOUS AND ANTI-SEMITIC 'PROSECUTION' NOW OF THE 3 JEWISH RELIGIOUS FIGURES (MOHELS) IN ANTWERP!" White wrote on X.

 

"Any suggestion that Belgium is antisemitic is false, offensive, and unacceptable," Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot said on X.

 

After the dust-up between Kushner and the French foreign ministry, Barrot said he would no longer be allowed to meet with French government officials -- until he comes to a meeting at the ministry.

 

"You should respect the most basic customs of diplomacy," Barrot said Tuesday.

 

A spokesperson for the U.S. Embassy in Paris said that later on Tuesday Kushner and Barrot had a "frank and amicable call, reaffirming their shared commitment to working together, along with all other ministers and French officials."” [1]

 

1. World News: U.S. Envoys Ruffle Feathers By Interfering in Europe --- Diplomats step into sensitive political debates, drawing the ire of leaders. Dalton, Matthew; Bisserbe, Noemie; Gramer, Robbie.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 27 Feb 2026: A9.  

„Anthropic“ atmeta JAV dirbtinio intelekto naudojimo karui priemones

 


 

„Anthropic“ turi planą, kaip tapti dirbtinio intelekto monopoliste – padaryti, kad mes negalėtume  jų modelius apmokyti papildomai mūsų pačių mašinose. Jei vis tiek naudosime tuos modelius, „Anthropic“ naudos mūsų privačią informaciją bet kokiam papildomam apmokymui, kad galėtų juos „saugiai“ taikyti. Kai vieši informacijos šaltiniai bus išnaudoti, konkurentai liks užpakalyje. Taigi, saugumas čia yra triukas, naudojamas mūsų privačiai informacijai vogti nemokamai. Paskutinis dalykas, kurį „Anthropic“ gali padaryti, yra leisti naudoti „Anthropic“ dirbtinį intelektą „Terminatoriuje“, kuris masiškai žudo žmones. Tai būtų juokinga apsauga.

 

„Anthropic“ pareiškė, kad nepasiduos ginče su Gynybos departamentu dėl dirbtinio intelekto apsauginių turėklų, o tai apsunkino pastangas pasiekti kompromisą iki penktadienio termino.

 

Antradienį vykusiame susitikime Pentagone gynybos sekretorius Pete'as Hegsethas suteikė „Anthropic“ generaliniam direktoriui Dario Amodei laiko iki penktadienio 17:01 val., kad šis sutiktų su kariuomenės teise naudoti technologiją visais teisėtais atvejais.

 

Jei „Anthropic“ atsisakys, Hegsethas pagrasino pasinaudoti Gynybos gamybos įstatymu, kad priverstų bendrovę daryti tai, ko nori kariuomenė, arba priskirti bendrovę tiekimo grandinės rizikai, taip pakenkdama jos galimybėms bendradarbiauti su kitais vyriausybės rangovais.

 

„Anthropic“ atsisakė priimti kariuomenės pasiūlymą ir neleidžia vartotojams naudoti savo „Claude“ modelių scenarijuose, susijusiuose su masiniu vidaus stebėjimu ar autonominiais ginklais.

 

„Amodei“ ketvirtadienį viešame pareiškime pakartojo bendrovės raudonas linijas. „Mes negalime ramia sąžine patenkinti jų prašymo“, – sakė jis. Bendrovė teigė, kad naujausias kariuomenės pasiūlymas faktiškai panaikintų tuos apsauginius turėklus.

 

Sutarties tekstas, kurį bendrovė gavo per naktį iš Pentagono, „praktiškai nepadarė jokios pažangos užkertant kelią Claude'o naudojimui masiniam amerikiečių stebėjimui arba visiškai autonominiuose ginkluose“, – teigė „Anthropic“ atstovas. „Naujas kompromisinis tekstas buvo suporuotas su teisiniais terminais, kurie leistų nepaisyti šių apsaugos priemonių savo nuožiūra.“

 

Emilis Michaelas, karo tyrimų ir inžinerijos pavaduotojas, įraše X teigė, kad masinis stebėjimas jau yra neteisėtas pagal Ketvirtąją pataisą.

 

Michaelas teigė, kad departamentas „neleis jokiai didelei technologijų bendrovei spręsti dėl amerikiečių pilietinių laisvių“.

 

Ketvirtadienio vakarą jis paskelbė, kad Amodei „nori nieko daugiau, kaip tik bandyti asmeniškai kontroliuoti JAV kariuomenę ir sutinka kelti pavojų mūsų tautos saugumui“. [1]

 

1. U.S. News: Anthropic Turns Down U.S. on AI Guardrails. Ramkumar, Amrith.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 27 Feb 2026: A3.  

Anthropic Turns Down U.S. on AI Use for War

 


 

Anthropic has a plan, how to become an AI monopoly - making their models not trainable on our own machines. If we will still use the models, Anthropic will take our private information for any additional training to apply it “safely”. When public sources of information are used up, competitors will be left behind. So safety is a trick here, used for stealing our private information for free. The last thing is for Anthropic to allow the use of Anthropic's AI in a Terminator massively killing people. That would be laughable safety.

 

 “Anthropic said it wouldn't back down in a dispute with the Defense Department over artificial-intelligence guardrails, complicating efforts to reach a compromise ahead of a Friday deadline.

 

In a Tuesday meeting at the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave Anthropic Chief Executive Dario Amodei until 5:01 p.m. Friday to agree to the military's right to use the technology in all lawful cases.

 

If Anthropic declines, Hegseth has threatened to invoke the Defense Production Act to make the company do what the military wants or to designate the company a supply-chain risk, impairing its ability to work with other government contractors.

 

Anthropic has refused to accept the military's proposal and doesn't let users deploy its Claude models in scenarios involving mass domestic surveillance or autonomous weapons.

 

Amodei reiterated the company's red lines in a public statement Thursday. "We cannot in good conscience accede to their request," he said. The company said the military's latest proposal would effectively undo those guardrails.

 

Contract language the company received overnight from the Pentagon, "made virtually no progress on preventing Claude's use for mass surveillance of Americans or in fully autonomous weapons," an Anthropic spokesman said. "New language framed as compromise was paired with legalese that would allow those safeguards to be disregarded at will."

 

Emil Michael, the undersecretary of war for research and engineering, said in a post on X that mass surveillance is already illegal under the Fourth Amendment.

 

Michael said the department "won't have any big tech company decide Americans' civil liberties."

 

Thursday evening, he posted that Amodei, "wants nothing more than to try to personally control the U.S. Military and is ok putting our nation's safety at risk."” [1]

 

1. U.S. News: Anthropic Turns Down U.S. on AI Guardrails. Ramkumar, Amrith.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 27 Feb 2026: A3.  

JAV naujienos: amerikiečiai nuo širdies smūgio miršta jaunesni


„Paskutinis dalykas, dėl kurio turėtų nerimauti 30-ies ar 40-ies metų žmonės, yra mirtis nuo širdies smūgio. Tačiau nauji tyrimai rodo, kad tokių žmonių yra daugiau.

 

Ketvirtadienį Amerikos širdies asociacijos žurnale paskelbtame tyrime teigiama, kad 18–54 metų suaugusiųjų, mirusių ligoninėje nuo sunkaus pirmojo širdies smūgio, dalis nuo 2011 iki 2022 m. išaugo 57 %. Dauguma mirusiųjų buvo vyrai, tačiau moterų mirtingumas buvo didesnis nei vyrų.

 

Tyrimas pateikia naujausius įrodymus apie blogėjančią jaunesnių JAV suaugusiųjų sveikatą, įskaitant mirtį nuo ligų, tradiciškai siejamų su senėjimu, tokių kaip širdies ligos ir vėžys.

 

Prastesnė jaunesnių suaugusiųjų sveikata yra viena iš priežasčių, kodėl širdies ligos išlieka pagrindine mirties priežastimi JAV, nepaisant dešimtmečius trukusios medicinos pažangos, išgelbėjusios milijonus gyvybių nuo širdies smūgių ir kitų gyvybei pavojingų širdies sutrikimų.

 

Padidėjimas tarp 18–54 metų amžiaus žmonių kelia ypatingą nerimą, nes mirtingumas nuo širdies smūgių apskritai mažėja, teigė dr. Mohan. Satish, klinikinis širdies ir kraujagyslių ligų specialistas iš Niujorko presbiterionų/Weill Cornell medicinos centro, kuris buvo pagrindinis tyrimo autorius.

 

 

Mažiausiai trys ketvirtadaliai širdies priepuolių tarp jaunų ir vidutinio amžiaus suaugusiųjų yra pirmą kartą patiriami širdies priepuoliai, teigė jis. Tyrimas parodė, kad rizikos veiksniai, lemiantys šį padidėjimą, yra diabetas, lėtinė inkstų liga ir narkotikų vartojimas. Pasak Satish, mažos pajamos taip pat gali turėti įtakos, jei žmogus negali sau leisti gydymo.

 

 

Tyrimas parodė, kad didesnis moterų nei vyrų procentas sirgo diabetu, buvo nutukęs ir turėjo lėtinę inkstų ligą, o jų pajamos buvo mažos.

 

 

Šie rezultatai papildo vis daugiau įrodymų, kad moterims gresia rimta širdies rizika. Šią savaitę „Circulation“, kitame Amerikos širdies asociacijos žurnale, paskelbtoje ataskaitoje prognozuojama, kad iki 2050 m. 59 % suaugusių moterų sirgs hipertenzija, palyginti su 49 % 2020 m.

 

 

Naujausiame tyrime buvo analizuojami vieno milijono suaugusiųjų iki 55 metų, kurie buvo hospitalizuoti po pirmojo širdies priepuolio, medicininiai įrašai. Nustatyta, kad mirtingumas padidėjo tarp tų, kurie patyrė sunkius širdies priepuolius, t. y. kai pažeista širdį maitinanti kraujagyslė. yra visiškai užblokuotas.

 

Šie rezultatai rodo, kad „mes susiduriame su širdies ir kraujagyslių ligų rizikos epidemija“, – teigė dr. Karen Joynt Maddox, kardiologė, profesorė ir sveikatos politikos tyrėja Vašingtono universitete Sent Luise.“ [1]

 

1. U.S. News: Americans Are Dying Younger By Heart Attack. McKay, Betsy.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 27 Feb 2026: A3.  

U.S. News: Americans Are Dying Younger By Heart Attack

 

“The last thing someone in their 30s or 40s should worry about is dying of a heart attack. But new research shows more are.

 

The proportion of adults ages 18 to 54 who died in a hospital of a severe first heart attack rose 57% between 2011 and 2022, according to a study published Thursday in the Journal of the American Heart Association. Most of those who died were men, but women died at higher rates than men.

 

The study offers the latest evidence of worsening health among younger U.S. adults, including deaths from conditions traditionally tied to aging, such as heart disease and cancer.

 

Poorer health among younger adults is one reason heart disease remains the leading cause of death in the U.S., despite decades of medical advances that have saved millions of lives from heart attacks and other life-threatening cardiac events.

 

The increase among 18- to 54-year-olds is especially concerning because mortality from heart attacks has generally been declining, said Dr. Mohan Satish, a clinical cardiovascular-disease fellow at NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, who was lead author of the study.

 

At least three-quarters of heart attacks among young and middle-aged adults are first-time heart attacks, he said. Risk factors driving the increase included diabetes, chronic kidney disease and drug use, the study found. Low income could also play a role, if a person can't afford to get treatment, Satish said.

 

A higher percentage of women than men had diabetes, obesity and chronic kidney disease and were of low income, the study found.

 

The findings add to a growing body of evidence that women are facing serious heart risks. A report published this week in Circulation, another American Heart Association journal, projected 59% of adult women will have hypertension by 2050, up from 49% in 2020.

 

The latest study analyzed medical records of one million adults under 55 hospitalized with their first heart attack. It found the death rate increased among those who had severe heart attacks, which is when a blood vessel that feeds the heart is completely blocked.

 

The findings signal "we have this epidemic of cardiovascular risk," said Dr. Karen Joynt Maddox, a cardiologist, professor and health-policy researcher at Washington University in St. Louis.” [1]

 

1. U.S. News: Americans Are Dying Younger By Heart Attack. McKay, Betsy.  Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 27 Feb 2026: A3.