“In autumn, the fields empty out, and farmers tally up the
season’s results. As always, there was no shortage of challenges: farm costs
rose, produce prices fluctuated, and unpredictable weather conditions
complicated harvest forecasts. Under these circumstances, it is evident that
neither higher subsidies nor an expansion of cultivated land will solve the
sector's fundamental problems. In the long run, the competitiveness of
Lithuanian farms will depend on the ability to use existing resources more
efficiently, diversify operations, and generate more value from the same
hectare of land.
The value
added per hectare in Lithuanian agriculture lags significantly behind that of
other European Union countries. According to preliminary Eurostat data, the
value added per hectare of cultivated land in Lithuania last year was roughly
one-third of the European Union average: while the EU figure stood at
approximately €1,500/ha, in Lithuania it was around €500/ha.
A stark
gap in value added is evident when comparing the situation with neighboring
Poland. Last year, the value added per hectare of arable land in Poland
amounted to approximately €1,450/ha. Meanwhile, based on results from the last
three years, the value added generated in Poland averaged around
€1,200/ha—roughly 2.5 times higher than in Lithuania.
Farmers
in Poland face many similar challenges, yet they generate more value added per
hectare because production is more diversified, with significant value created
in the livestock, fruit, and vegetable sectors.
Key factors include what is grown, the efficiency of
resource use, the technologies applied, and—crucially—the proportion of
harvested raw materials subsequently processed into higher-value products.
Diversifying operations: 30% more profit
One structural characteristic of Lithuanian agriculture is a
heavy reliance on grain cultivation. Consequently, one way to increase the
value generated per hectare would be to diversify operations further, placing
greater emphasis on non-grain agricultural sectors. Moreover, this would
enhance resilience against adverse weather conditions and geopolitical
fluctuations.
The Polish example demonstrates the potential of this
approach. Last year, the growth of agricultural value added in the country was
significantly bolstered by the production of fruit, vegetables, and poultry
products. In other words, higher earnings are achieved not merely by increasing
the volume of primary produce, but also by expanding activities that allow for
the creation of greater economic value from the same raw materials.
According to SEB Bank data, farms that diversify their
operations—for instance, by combining crop and livestock farming—generate, on
average, about 30% higher profits in the long run compared to specialized crop
farms. A broader operational structure can also stabilize income by reducing
reliance on price fluctuations affecting a single commodity.
We export raw materials rather than finished products
One of the key untapped opportunities for Lithuania’s
agricultural sector lies in processing. A large share of the country’s
agricultural output is still exported unprocessed; consequently, the
opportunity to generate earnings from subsequent stages of the value chain is
lost along with the raw material. At the same time, the sector becomes highly
vulnerable to global commodity price fluctuations.
According to data from the State Data Agency, slightly more
than 80% of the wheat grown in Lithuania has been exported over the past five
years. At the same time, rapeseed exports accounted for approximately 65% of
total output. If farms were to convert a larger share of this produce into
ingredients, food products, feed components, or other higher-value goods within
Lithuania, they would boost their operational profitability. Furthermore, a
greater share of the economic benefits would remain within the country.
Admittedly, positive changes are already visible in the
market this year. The opening of a large rapeseed processing plant is expected
to significantly increase the volume of rapeseed processed domestically,
potentially reducing the share of exported raw material to 45–55% in the
future.
Lithuanian milk is already part of a much longer value
chain—extending from the farm to the final product on store shelves in
Lithuania or abroad. In 2025, as much as 97% of the raw milk purchased in
Lithuania was processed domestically; consequently, raw material exports in
this sector are negligible. There is still room to increase the share of
finished dairy products, as a significant amount of intermediate production
goods is currently exported.
Applying similar logic on a larger scale to the grain, meat,
and vegetable sectors—among others—would allow a greater share of the final
product's value to remain in Lithuania, potentially narrowing the gap with
other EU countries.
Costs are rising faster than product prices
The need for farms to alter their business models is further
reinforced by rising operating costs. According to Eurostat data, key
agricultural input costs in the European Union rose by an average of about 30%
between 2020 and 2025. At the same time, the prices of certain crop
products—particularly cereals—did not increase at the same rate. For instance,
wheat prices rose by only about 15% between 2020 and 2025, whereas rapeseed
prices increased at the same rate as input costs, about 30%
A business model focused solely on grain crops is becoming
unsustainable: higher production volumes do not necessarily translate into
higher earnings. Therefore, to ensure sufficient cash flow for investments and
loan servicing, it is crucial to increase production in higher value-added
segments.
Technological solutions—such as soil testing, data analysis,
precision farming systems, milking robots, and livestock health
monitoring—could also help farmers boost efficiency. Technology automates
certain processes and reduces labor costs. Furthermore, reliable data enables
farmers to use fertilizers, feed, and other resources more precisely.
The greatest opportunity: generating more value from what we
already produce
While technology enables more efficient production and cost
reduction, processing offers the chance to earn more from the same raw
materials. It is precisely the combination of these two approaches that can
help Lithuanian farms enhance their competitiveness.
By transforming grain, milk, meat, or vegetables into
ingredients, functional foods, feed additives, or strong regional brands—rather
than just export commodities—a larger share of the final product's value would
remain in Lithuania. The dairy sector already demonstrates how an extended
local value chain can work. It is now important to capitalize on similar
opportunities in other sectors that are still dominated by raw commodity
trading or remain heavily focused on grain crops.
The author of the commentary is Modestas Kieras, Head of the
Business Client Services Department at SEB Bank.”
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą