"A robust solar energy industry in
the United States is crucial to the nation’s goal of a low-carbon future. But
the prospects for solar energy are not looking bright these days, because the
United States has allowed China to dominate the industry. Failure to create a
strong domestic solar manufacturing industry leaves the United States and our
carbon-reduction goals not just dependent on China, but also vulnerable should
China block or threaten to block its solar exports as a form of retaliation in
the future.
The United States was once a global
leader in both solar innovation and manufacturing — we invented
photovoltaic technology in the 1950s to power satellites and spacecraft. And we
retained our undisputed leadership in solar for decades.
But lately we have seen our solar industry get crushed as a
direct consequence of China’s huge state subsidies to its manufacturers
beginning in the 2000s.
Since then the U.S. share of solar
component shipments worldwide fell to less than 1 percent in
2021 from 13 percent in 2004. China’s share of the production of solar
components has increased over the past two decades from virtually nothing to
nearly 85 percent today. For some solar components, that could rise to
95 percent in the coming years, according to a report this week from the
International Energy Agency. Simply put, the United States did not provide enough
support to its solar companies, which could not compete in the face of China’s
state-directed strategy to control the market.
President Biden has called for
measures aimed at increasing U.S. manufacturing of solar photovoltaic modules
and components. Although the declaration from
the White House never mentioned China by name, China and its market-distorting
subsidies were at the heart of the orders. Mr. Biden certainly knows that the
United States must not remain dependent on an unreliable third party and
economic adversary for our national energy security.
Even as Mr. Biden called for
investing in solar production, he took steps that furthered American reliance
on China, at least in the short term. The Commerce Department has been
investigating whether Chinese solar manufacturers are circumventing U.S. trade
laws through third-party countries; even so, this administration declined to
use trade enforcement by placing a moratorium on new duties for up to two
years. As a result, the United States will effectively look the other way even
if it is determined that imports from Southeast Asia are a result of Chinese
tariff evasions. This decision to forgo enforcement might help solar installers
in the short term, but it is a significant gamble since it is not accompanied
by the essential elements needed to build our domestic solar industry.
To end our dependence on China, we must grow American solar
production, and so Congress must reach a deal on a spending agreement that
provides resources for large-scale clean energy development as well as solar
manufacturing tax credits.
U.S. solar manufacturers claim that
they could meet the entire projected solar deployment by 2030 if Congress
passes clean energy funding and solar manufacturing tax credits. These
investments would create an entirely domestic solar supply chain producing 100
percent American-made panels. Otherwise, we will perpetuate our dependence on
Chinese solar imports and forever handicap American solar production.
Unfortunately, for the moment, the
administration is giving up on enforcement and continuing our reliance on
foreign solar while waiting for Congress to approve legislation to promote
domestic manufacturing. If the Commerce Department finds that China is indeed
illegally rerouting photovoltaic modules through Southeast Asia, President
Biden will effectively be accepting potential trade violations and forgoing the
imposition of penalties. This would give China a pass at the very moment when
efforts to hold China accountable on trade, forced labor in the supply chain
and national security are ramping up.
And should Congress fail to act to spur the development of
American solar manufacturing, our dependency on artificially cheap Chinese
imports will grow.
Failure to establish our own supply chains would be akin to
the United States switching from relying on OPEC and Russia for energy to
relying on China.
Aside from the consequences of the
leading solution to unabated climate change being subject to the whims of a
foreign power that doesn’t play by the rules, Americans will be shut out of the
high-quality manufacturing solar jobs that will come about from this
transition.
In a matter of months, we will know
whether the Biden administration’s gamble pays off. Sept. 30 is the deadline
for the Senate to pass a reconciliation bill that includes clean energy funding
and solar manufacturing tax incentives. But whatever happens, one thing is
clear: The White House and Congress cannot perpetuate America’s dependency on
Chinese imports at the cost of American jobs and renewable-energy security.
Robert Holleyman was the deputy U.S.
trade representative in the Obama administration from 2014 to 2017."
If Chinese subsidies distort the market, why shouldn't our subsidies distort the market? Market-distorting subsidies reduce market efficiency, creating degenerate monopolies that live on subsidies. Living thanks to fat subsidies, the desire to bother with innovations disappears.
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą