“How England Began
By Nicholas J. Higham
Yale, 368 pages, $35
Imagine a Romano-British gentleman in the middle of the fourth century. He lives somewhere in the fertile countryside of what would become southern England, near the estates whose rents pay for his lifestyle. His home is a comfortable rural mansion where he resides with his family members and the slaves who look after them. He speaks and reads Latin, the language of the Roman Empire, though perhaps he addresses his tenants in Brittonic, the Celtic tongue of the British Iron Age. As a Roman citizen he grumbles about taxes yet knows that the state keeps the peace. The imperial economy brings him clothes, pottery, wine, spices and books.
Now consider a man of equivalent social status, in roughly the same place, 200 or so years later. He is an Anglo-Saxon war chief. He lives in a drafty timber hall with a beaten-earth floor, surrounded by his family and armed retainers. He speaks Old English and is illiterate, though his culture is rich in poetry and heroic tales. Roman power has collapsed in Britain, which is now a patchwork of minor kingdoms where all politics is local and low-level warfare is constant.
He is one actor in a shifting and dangerous landscape. Occasional traders provide him with metalwork and slaves but little else.
In his splendid "How England Began," Nicholas J. Higham tells the story of how the Romano-British gentleman gave way to the Anglo-Saxon war chief. As Mr. Higham notes, our understanding of the transformation of Roman Britain into England is beset by problems of evidence. There are few written sources for events in Britain between the breakdown of Roman power there in the early fifth century and the conversion of the Anglo-Saxons to Christianity that began around the year 600. Archaeology is more useful, but the shift from a Roman economy with cheap, ubiquitous pottery and numerous coins to an early medieval one without much of either deprives us of many of our usual historical materials. This truly was a dark age, at least in the sense that we know so little about it.
Mr. Higham, a professor emeritus of history at the University of Manchester, steers readers through this difficult terrain. After introducing Roman Britain in broad strokes, he gives a judicious account of how imperial authority on the island was swept away in a chaotic period of civil war and barbarian invasion.
In 407 the long-unpaid Roman army in Britain rebelled by proclaiming a common soldier as Constantine III. This new emperor led his forces into Gaul in a bid for supreme power but was ultimately defeated and executed in 411. There was no serious effort afterward to restore imperial power on the island. Roman Britain didn't so much end as fade away.
There were sharp changes in economic and social life in the decades after Constantine III. Manufacturing industries collapsed and the last vestiges of urban life vanished.
But there were also continuities. Archaeology shows there was no dramatic contraction in the amount of land that was farmed. Mr. Higham suggests that Roman-style politics and administration continued for some time, "leaving no room for any kind of late Roman workers' revolutionary party to seize power."
Mr. Higham insists on the importance of our few written sources. Despite their problems, he writes, "texts do have the crucial advantage of starting with words. Teeth, pots and the rest do not." The closest we have to a contemporary historian is Gildas, a Briton likely writing in the first half of the sixth century. Gildas is both fascinating and obscure. Mr. Higham believes he lived in what is now southwest England. He was a product of the Roman-style landed elite that clung on tenaciously in that region. He seems to have been part of a group of cultured Britons who argued with one another about how to tackle the many problems they faced -- not least the invading Saxons.
In "Concerning the Ruin of Britain," Gildas assumed the voice of an Old Testament prophet, offering a fiery denunciation of the sins of his fellow Britons and urging them to repent so that they could defeat their Saxon enemies. Gildas, as Mr. Higham relates, likened post-Roman Britain to ancient Israel, exhorting his countrymen to "renew their compact with God and thereby recover His favor and, in consequence, their ancestral homeland." Incidental to his message, he provided a few historical snippets from the era, including a reference to the Battle of Badon (ca. 500), a British victory over the Saxons.
Besides Gildas, our main written sources for the period are the two surviving letters by St. Patrick, likely sent in the mid-fifth century, and Bede's "Ecclesiastical History of the English People," completed by 731. St. Patrick offered evocative details of slaving and missionary work in the lands around the Irish Sea. Bede seems often to have known no more than we do today. Gildas was his primary source.
Mr. Higham highlights the considerable migration from northwest Europe to eastern England following the collapse of Roman power. The Saxons, he writes, brought "an entire cultural, linguistic, and ideological package." They cremated their dead, spoke the Germanic ancestors of Old English and were pagans. Mr. Higham accepts that these newcomers violently subjugated some regions. While he allows that the "conquest and colonization" of much of lowland Britain by the Saxons drove its transformation into England, he demonstrates that the process was more complex and drawn-out than is sometimes supposed.
This is a dense book, packing in a great deal of thought and argument. It is at times slightly demanding and readers may wish to start with the elegant synthesis in Mr. Higham's final chapter before going back to see how he arrived at it. But the rewards for those who persevere are as rich as the imperial economy that once furnished bountiful goods to the Romano-British gentleman.
---
Mr. Woudhuysen is an associate professor of Roman history at the University of Nottingham.” [1]
It seems that after the end of an empire people are living in much greater danger and without many comforts of civilization.
The transition following the collapse of an empire is often chaotic, marked by disrupted trade, disappearing manufacturing, and localized power struggles. However, historical and academic research shows this is not always a permanent dark age; it is frequently a structural realignment where regional safety and resource autonomy can improve for regular people.
While it may seem that civilization vanishes, the transition out of an empire generally follows specific patterns:
• Loss of Imperial Specialization: Large-scale trade networks and highly specialized manufacturing dry up. This leads to a loss of mass-produced comforts, such as Roman mass-produced ceramics or the globalized supply chains of today.
• Localized Violence and Civil War: As the central authority’s monopoly on violence crumbles, regions often experience localized power grabs, warlordism, or civil wars as factions compete for control.
• Potential for Improved Welfare: The decline of centralized empires can sometimes benefit the average citizen. Without extractive institutions and heavy imperial grain taxes, rural populations often diversified their diets, experienced better physical health (as seen in post-Roman Europe), and were freed from forced labor.
• Decentralized Survival: People adapt by shifting to hyper-local economies, small-scale farming, and community-level resource sharing.
Scholars like Dr. Luke Kemp explore these cycles of imperial expansion and collapse in Goliath's Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse, noting that the loss of "civilizational comforts" often accompanies the shedding of oppressive imperial control.
1. A Path Through Dark Terrain. Woudhuysen, George. Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.. 08 July 2026: A15.
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą