Sekėjai

Ieškoti šiame dienoraštyje

2022 m. liepos 19 d., antradienis

Lithuania: Mathematical disability of the country

  "Mid-July. Traditionally, in this period, the results of state matriculation exams are announced in the country. Graduations of twelfth graders take place in schools.

 

    As is the tradition every year, the exam results are not brilliant. As usual in Lithuania, the results of the state mathematics exams are again unpleasantly surprising.

 

    35 percent graduates who took mathematics did not pass the exam. 14,490 candidates took the state matriculation exam in mathematics. Failed - 5300 students. About 9 thousand more students did not take the math exam at all.

 

    Hence, the Lithuanian secondary education system can only teach mathematics to half of all graduates.

 

    Others remain overboard. Twelve years at school, and as a result we explained to about 10 thousand children's mathematics and others not. Productivity is tragic.

 

    When explaining who is to blame for having the education system we have, the answers are divided, the responsibility is scattered. The coronavirus is to blame for the poor results. After all, the current twelfth graders have been studying remotely for almost the entire year.

 

    First, when they were still in their teens, they went to the so-called Saulius Skvernelis quarantine, which lasted for two months. In the eleventh grade, distance learning was again required. Ingrida Šimonytė's quarantine, which lasted for 200 days, caught up with the students. It all came together, and we can see the result in the exams.

 

    Others traditionally place the blame for poor results on the students themselves. If they didn't pass, they didn't study, they were lazy, they didn't put in enough effort, so they got it based on merit. After all, there were students who got the highest grade in the math exam this year as well.

 

    It is true that only 0.8 percent received the highest rating of one hundred points from candidates who took the exam.

 

    It is no secret here that Lithuania does not have oil or gas that could be sold at a high price on the international market and thus ensure the country's high economic well-being. We do not have any other natural resources, the sale of which would generate huge revenues.

 

    Our only asset is our people. Therefore, their health and level of education are almost the most important indicators.

 

    The world is moving with increasing speed on the highway of the fourth industrial revolution. Global automation, robotization, big data and the connection of these processes will soon become the main driving force of industry and the factor of state progress.

 

    In the near future, the fifth industrial revolution will knock on the door, which will be based on human-robot cooperation.

 

    The existing system of teaching secondary education, and especially mathematics, does not meet modern challenges. The students' results show that Lithuania is not ready for tectonic changes in life. Half of the children do not know mathematics, so they will not be able to participate in creating robots, developing automation or analyzing big data.

 

    The country's potential is already being cut in half today. Of those who passed mathematics, only a small part will choose engineering specialties. There will be a small number of people who will actually work on the changes that will determine the life of the whole society.

 

    After all, it is predicted that the fourth industrial revolution will push part of the working-age people to the poverty line. The middle class will shrink. It seems that Lithuanian politicians responsible for education have decided not to wait and implement future changes now.

 

    Half of the country's high school graduates have already been pushed to the margins in terms of future prospects.

 

    First, we should stop blaming the math students who failed. It's not their problem. 35 percent it is not an individual problem, but a collective one. The ideology of political liberalism that has taken hold in Lithuania, that everyone is a smith of his own luck, will not help to solve the issue of education.

 

    If we continue to publicly say that the students themselves are to blame for the bad results, that the parents paid too little attention to their children and their academic achievements, then there will be no incentive to undertake systemic reforms.

 

    The general problem will remain individualized and unsolvable. Exam results are a systematic sample of the country's education results. A personalized approach can only help individuals. In the absence of collective awareness, learning outcomes will not change substantially.

 

    The saddest thing is that every year after the exams there are discussions about why students' knowledge is falling, but effective changes in education do not take place. It would seem that the leadership should be taken by the Ministry of Education, Science and Sports, its leadership, as well as the Education and Science Committee of the Seimas.

 

    It seems that we will not get leadership from the current government.

 

    A system has been created in Lithuania during the endless education reform that has been going on for many years, when the problem of results is obvious, and there are no responsible people. The Ministry of Education is theoretically responsible for the preparation of educational programs, but not for their implementation.

 

    Municipal education departments are responsible for this, but the latter do not always have enough resources to implement what is written in the programs. The division of schools into primary, pro-gymnasiums and gymnasiums seemed to bring better education learning experience, a more individualized approach.

 

    In reality, it turned into nobody being responsible for anything. Is a teacher who did not teach children math in elementary school accountable to a pro-gymnasium math teacher? No. He doesn't see that teacher. They do not work together, so there is no need to blush in front of a colleague because of work simulation.

 

    The same is repeated in the case of progymnasium and gymnasium. Two different schools, two different principals. Unfortunately, one common negative result of twelve years, which appears after the state matriculation exams. An education system has been created where there are many babysitters and children are left to fend for themselves.

 

    The Ministry of Education publicly declares that changes in schools are a priori slow, so the results will be seen in the best case after five to ten years. We will do something, and you will see whether it will work or how it will work in the future, when neither the current ministers nor the deputy ministers or the ruling coalition of conservatives and liberals will be long gone. Therefore, you will not have to answer for changes.

 

    It is also bad that, basically, civil servants responsible for education lend a hand to future twelfth graders. Those who will take the exams in 2023. We are talking about changes in 2024, 2025 or 2027. The preparation of future twelfth graders for state exams is their own business.

 

    We have the bankruptcy of the education system and the government's inability to deal with these issues, but we don't dare to say it out loud."

 

We have only one asset of immense value - the thought of Vytautas Landsbergis. We will use it to start a nuclear war. All our young people will be dead by then. They will get 40 virgins each in another life. Who needs math?

 


Matematinis šalies neįgalumas

 

"Liepos vidurys. Tradiciškai šiuo laikotarpiu šalyje paskelbiami valstybinių brandos egzaminų rezultatai. Mokyklose įvyksta dvyliktokų išleistuvės.

Kaip ir kasmet tradiciškai egzaminų rezultatai – neblizgantys. Kaip jau įprasta Lietuvoje – nemaloniai ir vėl stebina valstybinio matematikos egzaminų rezultatai.

35 proc. abiturientų laikiusių matematiką neišlaikė egzamino. Valstybinį matematikos brandos egzaminą laikė 14490 kandidatų. Neišlaikė – 5300 moksleivių. Dar daugiau maždaug 9 tūkst. mokinių matematikos egzamino apskritai nelaikė.

Vadinasi Lietuvos vidurinio mokslo sistema gali išmokyti matematikos tik pusę visų abiturientų. 

Kiti – lieka už borto. Dvylika metų mokykloje, o rezultatas išmokome maždaug 10 tūkst. vaikų matematikos, o kitų – ne. Produktyvumas tragiškas.

Aiškinantis, kas kaltas, kad turime tokią švietimo sistemą, kokią turime atsakymai pasidalija, atsakomybė išsibarsto. Dėl prastų rezultatų kaltas koronavirusas. Juk dabartiniai dvyliktokai kone visus metus mokėsi nuotoliniu būdu.

Pirmiausia, dar būdami dešimtokai, jie išėjo į taip vadinamą, per du mėnesius trukusį, Sauliaus Skvernelio karantiną. Vienuoliktoje klasėje vėl reikėjo mokytis nuotoliniu būdu. Moksleivius pasivijo, per 200 dienų trukęs, Ingridos Šimonytės karantinas. Visa tai susidėjo, o rezultatą matome egzaminuose.

Kiti kaltę dėl prastų rezultatų tradiciškai suverčia patiems moksleiviams. Neišlaikę nesimokė, tingėjo, nedėjo pakankamai pastangų, tad gavo pagal nuopelnus. Juk ir šiais metais buvo moksleivių, kurie matematikos egzamine gavo aukščiausią įvertinimą.

Tiesa, nutylime, kad aukščiausią šimto balų įvertinimą gavo vos 0,8 proc. egzaminą laikiusių kandidatų.

Jokia čia paslaptis, kad Lietuva neturi naftos ar dujų, kurias galėtų brangiai parduoti tarptautinėje rinkoje ir taip užsitikrinti aukštą šalies ekonominę gerovę. Neturime ir kitų gamtinių iškasenų, kurių pardavimai generuotų milžiniškas įplaukas.

Vienintelis mūsų turtas – tai mūsų žmonės. Tad jų sveikata ir išsilavinimo lygis kone svarbiausi rodikliai.

Pasaulis, su vis didėjančiu pagreičiu, juda ketvirtosios pramonės revoliucijos greitkeliu. Jau greitai visuotinis automatizavimas, robotizacija, didieji duomenys ir šių procesų jungtis taps pagrindine pramonės varomąja jėga bei valstybės pažangos faktoriumi.

Netolimoje ateityje į duris pasibels ir penktoji pramonės revoliucija, kuri bus grįsta žmogaus ir robotų bendradarbiavimu.

Esama vidurinio mokslo, o ypač matematikos mokinimo sistema, neatitinka šiuolaikinių iššūkių. Mokinių rezultatai rodo, kad Lietuva nepasirengusi tektoniniams gyvenimo pokyčiams. Pusę vaikų nemoka matematikos, tad ir dalyvauti kuriant robotus, vystant automatizaciją ar analizuojant didžiuosius duomenis negalės.

Šalies potencialas jau šiandien pjaunamas per pusę. Iš tų, kurie išlaikė matematiką – tik nedidelė dalis rinksis inžinerines specialybes. Realiai dirbsiančių prie pokyčių lemsiančių visos visuomenės gyvenimą bus nedidelis skaičius žmonių.

O juk prognozuojama, kad ketvirtoji pramonės revoliucija dalį darbingo amžiaus žmonių stums prie skurdo ribos. Vidurinioji klasė trauksis. Panašu, kad už švietimą atsakingi Lietuvos politikai nutarė nelaukti ir ateities pokyčius įgyvendinti dabar.

Jau dabar pusę šalies abiturientų – ateities perspektyvų atžvilgiu nublokšti į paraštes.

Pirmiausia turėtume nustoti kaltinti neišlikusių matematikos moksleivių. Tai ne jų problema. 35 proc. tai ne individuali, o kolektyvinė problema. Lietuvoje įsigalėjusi politinio liberalizmo ideologija, kad kiekvienas savo laimės kalvis, spręsti švietimo klausimo nepadės.

Jei ir toliau viešai kalbėsime, kad dėl blogų rezultatų kalti patys moksleiviai, per mažai dėmesio savo vaikams ir jų mokslo pasiekimams skyrė tėvai, tuomet nebus paskatos imtis sisteminių pertvarkymų.

Bendra problema liks individualizuota ir nespręstina. Egzaminų rezultatai – sisteminis šalies švietimo rezultato pavyzdys. Individualizuotas požiūris gali padėti tik atskiriems asmenims. Nesant kolektyvinio suvokimo, mokymosi rezultatai iš esmės neiškeis.

Liūdniausia tai, kad kiekvienais metais po egzaminų kyla diskusijos, kodėl krenta moksleivių žinios, bet veiksmingų pokyčių švietime neįvyksta. Atrodytų, kad lyderystės turėtų imtis Švietimo, mokslo ir sporto ministerija, jos vadovybė, o taip pat Seimo švietimo ir mokslo komitetas.

Panašu, kad lyderystės iš dabartinės valdžios nesulauksime.

Lietuvoje per ilgus metus vykusią nesibaigiančią švietimo reformą sukurta sistema, kai rezultatų problema akivaizdi, o atsakingų nėra. Švietimo ministerija teoriškai atsakinga už mokymosi programų parengimą, bet neatsakinga už jų įgyvendinimą.

Už tai atsakingi savivaldybių švietimo skyriai, bet ne visuomet pastarieji turi pakankamai resursų įgyvendinti tai, kas parašyta programose. Mokyklų suskaidymas į pradines, progimnazijas ir gimnazijas tarsi turėjo atnešti geresnę mokymosi patirtį, labiau individualizuotą požiūrį.

Realiai tai išvirto į niekas neatsakingas už nieką. Ar pradinėje mokykloje vaikus matematikos nemokęs mokytojas atskaitingas progimnazijos matematikos mokytojui? Ne. Jis to mokytojo nemato. Kartu nedirba, tad raudonuoti prieš kolegą dėl darbo imitavimo nereikia.

Tas pats pasikartoja progimnazijos ir gimnazijos atveju. Dvi skirtingos mokyklos, du skirtingi direktoriai. Deja, vienas bendras neigiamas dvylikos metų rezultatas, pasimatantis po valstybinių brandos egzaminų. Sukurta švietimo sistema, kur daugybę auklių, o vaikai paliekami patys sau.

Švietimo ministerija viešai deklaruoja, jog pokyčiai mokyklose a priori lėti, tad rezultatai geriausiu atveju pasimatys po penkių – dešimties metų. Kažką padarysime, o ar tai veiks, kaip veiks pamatysite ateityje, kai nei dabartinės ministrės, nei viceministrų ar valdančiosios konservatorių ir liberalų koalicijos seniai nebebus pareigose. Vadinasi, atsakyti už pokyčius nereikės.

Blogai ir tai, kad iš esmės, už švietimą atsakingi valstybės tarnautojai, numojama ranka ir į būsimus dvyliktokus. Tuos, kurie egzaminus laikys 2023 metais. Kalbama apie pokyčius 2024, 2025 ar 2027 metus. Būsimų dvyliktokų pasirengimas valstybiniams egzaminams – pačių jų reikalas.

Turime švietimo sistemos bankrotą ir valdžios neįgalumą spręsti šiuos klausimus, bet nedrįstame to garsiai pasakyti."

 

Turime tik vieną be galo vertingą turtą – Vytauto Landsbergio mintį. Mes panaudosime ją branduoliniam karui pradėti. Tada visi mūsų jaunuoliai bus mirę. Kitame gyvenime jie gaus po 40 nekaltų mergelių. Kam reikalinga matematika?


Scandinavian banks want to eat: Both companies and residents will be prohibited from paying cash amounts exceeding 5 000 euros in Lithuania

"ELTA reminds that on June 23 The Seimas adopted the Law on Limitation of Cash Payments, according to which from November 1 both companies and residents will be prohibited from paying cash amounts exceeding 5 000 euros. 

 

    "According to the adopted document, "violation of the procedure for settlements and any other payments based on cash transactions, when, in violation of the established procedure, the amount of cash used for settlements and any other payments exceeds the amount allowed for cash settlement by up to 50 base penalties and fines for persons paying and accepting payments fines will be from 100 to 500 euros, and for heads of legal entities paying and accepting payments or their departments - from 200 to 1,000 euros". Such an administrative offense, committed repeatedly, will attract a fine from 200 to 1,000 euros for the persons paying and accepting payments, and from 1,000 to 2,000 euros for the heads of the paying and accepting legal entities or their departments.

 

    If the amount of cash used exceeds the amount allowed for cash settlement by 50 to 500 basic penalties and fines, it will result in a fine of 200 to 1,000 euros for paying and accepting persons and from 1,000 to 1,000 for heads of legal entities that pay and accepting payments - 2 thousand euros. Such an administrative offense, committed repeatedly, will result in a fine from one thousand to two thousand for those who pay and accept payments for the heads of both paying and receiving legal entities or their divisions - from 2 thousand up to 3 thousand euros.


    An even greater fine will await if, in violation of the established procedure, the amount of cash used for settlements and any other payments exceeds the amount allowed for cash settlement by 500 or more basic penalties and fines. According to the adopted document, this will result in fines from one thousand to two thousand for those who pay and accept payments EUR for the heads of both paying and receiving legal entities or their divisions - from 2 thousand. up to 3 thousand euros. Such an administrative offense, committed repeatedly, will result in a fine of 2,000 up to 3 thousand EUR, and for heads of paying and accepting legal entities or their departments - from 3 thousand up to 4 thousand euros. The new provisions of the code will enter into force on November 1 of this year. On Tuesday, 96 members of the Seimas voted for them, two were against, and twelve MPs abstained."

 

We remind you that during the next elections, Šimonytė will allow you to elect other parliamentarians.

 

 

 


Skandinavų bankai alkani: tiek įmonėms, tiek gyventojams bus uždrausta atsiskaityti grynųjų pinigų sumomis, viršijančiomis 5 tūkst. eurų

 ELTA primena, kad birželio 23 d. Seimas priėmė Atsiskaitymų grynaisiais pinigais ribojimo įstatymą, pagal kurį nuo lapkričio 1 d. tiek įmonėms, tiek gyventojams bus uždrausta atsiskaityti grynųjų pinigų sumomis, viršijančiomis 5 tūkst. eurų.

 

“Pagal priimtą dokumentą, „atsiskaitymų ir bet kokių kitų mokėjimų pagal sandorius grynaisiais pinigais tvarkos pažeidimas, kai, pažeidžiant nustatytą tvarką, atsiskaitymams ir bet kokiems kitiems mokėjimams panaudota grynųjų pinigų suma leidžiamą atsiskaityti grynaisiais pinigais sumą viršija iki 50 bazinių bausmių ir nuobaudų dydžių, užtraukia baudą mokantiems ir mokėjimus priimantiems asmenims nuo 100 iki 500 eurų ir mokančių, ir mokėjimus priimančių juridinių asmenų arba jų padalinių vadovams – nuo 200 iki tūkstančio eurų“. Toks administracinis nusižengimas, padarytas pakartotinai, užtrauks baudą mokantiems ir mokėjimus priimantiems asmenims nuo 200 iki 1000 eurų ir mokančių, ir mokėjimus priimančių juridinių asmenų arba jų padalinių vadovams – nuo tūkstančio iki 2 tūkst. eurų.

 

Jei panaudota grynųjų pinigų suma leidžiamą atsiskaityti grynaisiais pinigais sumą viršija nuo 50 iki 500 bazinių bausmių ir nuobaudų dydžių, tai užtrauks baudą mokantiems ir mokėjimus priimantiems asmenims nuo 200 iki tūkstančio eurų ir mokančių, ir mokėjimus priimančių juridinių asmenų arba jų padalinių vadovams – nuo tūkstančio iki 2 tūkst. eurų. Toks administracinis nusižengimas, padarytas pakartotinai, užtrauks baudą mokantiems ir mokėjimus priimantiems asmenims nuo tūkstančio iki 2 tūkst. eurų ir mokančių, ir mokėjimus priimančių juridinių asmenų arba jų padalinių vadovams – nuo 2 tūkst. iki 3 tūkst. eurų.

 

Dar didesnė bauda lauks, jei pažeidžiant nustatytą tvarką, atsiskaitymams ir bet kokiems kitiems mokėjimams panaudota grynųjų pinigų suma leidžiamą atsiskaityti grynaisiais pinigais sumą viršija 500 ir daugiau bazinių bausmių ir nuobaudų dydžių. Pagal priimtą dokumentą, tai užtrauks baudą mokantiems ir mokėjimus priimantiems asmenims nuo tūkstančio iki 2 tūkst. eurų ir mokančių, ir mokėjimus priimančių juridinių asmenų arba jų padalinių vadovams – nuo 2 tūkst. iki 3 tūkst. eurų. Toks administracinis nusižengimas, padarytas pakartotinai, užtrauks baudą mokantiems ir mokėjimus priimantiems asmenims nuo 2 tūkst. iki 3 tūkst. eurų, o mokančių ir mokėjimus priimančių juridinių asmenų arba jų padalinių vadovams – nuo 3 tūkst. iki 4 tūkst. eurų. Naujos kodekso nuostatos įsigalios šių metų lapkričio 1 d. Antradienį už jas balsavo 96 Seimo nariai, prieš buvo du, susilaikė dvylika parlamentarų.”

Primename, kad sekančių rinkimų metu Šimonytė jums leido išrinkti kitus parlamentrus.

 


 

2022 m. liepos 18 d., pirmadienis

As Russia Runs Low on Drones, Iran Plans to Step In, U.S. Officials Say

"WASHINGTON — The White House disclosure last week that Russia is seeking hundreds of armed and unarmed surveillance drones from Iran reflects Moscow’s need to both fill a critical battlefield gap and find a long-term supplier of a crucial combat technology, U.S. intelligence, military and independent analysts say.

Jake Sullivan, President Biden’s national security adviser, offered few details about the intelligence assessment he revealed to reporters last Monday, including whether the shipments had started. But other U.S. officials said Iran was preparing to provide as many as 300 remotely piloted aircraft and would start training Russian troops on how to use them as early as this month.

Russia has exhausted most of its precision-guided weapons as well as many of the drones it has used to help long-range artillery strike targets in its monthslong bombardment. Meantime, the first batches of American truck-mounted, multiple-rocket launchers have destroyed more than two dozen Russian ammunition depots, air defense sites and command posts, according to two U.S. officials, making Moscow’s need to counter the new, advanced Western arms more urgent.

Enter Iran, a leading drone developer for decades.

Iran has supplied drone technology to Hezbollah in Lebanon; to Houthi rebels in Yemen attacking Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates; and to Shiite militias in Iraq, which have carried out strikes against Iraqi and American troops.

“Russia is turning to an ally that has flown drones in complex environments in large numbers,” said Samuel Bendett, a specialist on Russian drones and other weapons at CNA, a research and analysis organization in Arlington, Va.

“While the Russians still have drones, they don’t have all the types they need.”

Russia’s deal with Iran underscores the ever-growing importance of drones to modern warfare, not just in insurgencies or counterterrorism operations but also in classic conventional-style conflicts. In a contested battlefield where dueling artillery barrages are the deciding factors if an offensive fails or succeeds, drones play a pivotal role.

A Russian delegation visited an airfield in central Iran at least twice in the last five weeks — June 8 and July 5 — to examine drones that can be armed, Mr. Sullivan said in a statement released by the White House and reported earlier by CNN. The Russians reviewed Shahed-191 and Shahed-129 drones, according to satellite imagery the White House provided with the statement to The New York Times.

Ukraine had its own drone fleet and has also used hundreds supplied by the United States and other NATO countries, like Turkey, to destroy hundreds of Russian tanks and armored personnel carriers, military officials said.

But analysts said Russian counterdrone and electronic warfare equipment, including jamming devices, have blunted the early success of the American and Turkish drones.

A recent report by the Royal United Services Institute, a research organization in London, concluded that Ukraine needed more electronic warfare equipment of its own to combat advanced Russian systems.

Ukrainian surveillance drones, which help target Russian troops, survive only about a week before Russian defenses force them to crash or shoot them down, the report said.

Ukraine and its supporters in Congress have pleaded for the United States and its allies to provide more and bigger drones that can carry more weapons and stay aloft longer, like the Gray Eagle aircraft. U.S. officials have shelved those proposals for now, fearing that the Gray Eagles would be easy targets for Russia’s air defenses and could also be viewed as escalatory by President Vladimir V. Putin.

Russia had its own formidable arsenal of drones, but the potential delivery of hundreds of armed and unarmed Iranian drones would help the Kremlin replenish a fleet that has suffered steep losses during the nearly five-month campaign.

Russia lost dozens of reconnaissance drones to Ukrainian air defenses and to mistaken attacks and jamming in the early phase of the conflict. Surveillance drones are essential to the grinding ground battle. But Russia’s defense industry has struggled to build capable armed drones in large quantities and other remotely piloted aircraft that can fly high over targets for hours at a time, analysts said.

The Russian military has honed its use of drones. The small unmanned aircraft have been a boon for quickly targeting Ukrainian forces and transmitting coordinates back to Russia’s longer-range weapons, including howitzers and mortars.

“They are surely improving their skills,” a Ukrainian Army major named Kostyantyn, who declined to provide his last name for security reasons, said this spring about the Russian military’s use of drones.

Ukrainian soldiers in the Donbas, the swath of territory in the east of the country that has become the focus of Russia’s military campaign, have said their artillery is almost immediately targeted by Russian counterfire, which they partially attribute to the use of drones.

Russian drones — primarily the Orlan-10, a small fixed-wing aircraft, along with small, commercially available quadcopters — have drastically changed how Ukrainian forces move around the battlefield. They park their vehicles under trees or other cover and must conceal artillery pieces to avoid being detected by overhead surveillance.

But even with proper camouflage, pro-Russian media channels frequently post videos of Ukrainian equipment being targeted and destroyed as a drone loiters above.

In recent weeks, however, Mr. Bendett and military analysts said, Russia’s edge in the drone wars has diminished. About 50 Orlan-10s have been brought down by Ukrainian or accidental Russian fire or jamming, analysts said.

As a result, demand remains high for off-the-shelf consumer models and modified amateur drones resistant to jamming. Both sides are using crowdfunding campaigns to replace lost equipment, analysts said.

Russia and Iran have given muted responses since Mr. Sullivan’s disclosure.

The Kremlin’s spokesman, Dmitri S. Peskov, declined on Wednesday to say if Moscow had any plans to purchase Iranian drones. He said Mr. Putin was not planning to discuss the issue during his scheduled trip to Tehran this week.

Western and even some Russian analysts say the Kremlin has seen the value of drones in various conflicts around the world for years, including in Syria. And yet Russia was not ready for the intense need in Ukraine.

Yuri Borisov, who until last week served as Russia’s deputy prime minister, said in an interview with a Russian news organization last month that the Russian military should have deployed drones in combat zones more aggressively.

“I think that we are belatedly engaged in the serious introduction of unmanned vehicles — this is the objective,” Mr. Borisov told the organization, RBC.

The United States has not seen indications that Iran has transferred any drones to Russia, a senior military official said in a Pentagon briefing on Friday. But U.S. officials and analysts said Moscow’s apparent deal with Iran was a major role reversal for one of the largest arms purveyors on the planet.

“Russia is used to selling military gear to nations like Iran, not the other way around,” said P.W. Singer, a strategist at New America in Washington who has written extensively about drones.

Iran has issued carefully worded comments about its military cooperation with Russia that some Iranian media outlets have interpreted as a confirmation of a drone deal.

On Tuesday, Nasser Kanani, a spokesman for Iran’s Foreign Ministry, told reporters that “military cooperation between Iran and the Russian Federation on new technology has not had a significant change in recent times.”

Exactly which types of drones Russia may seek from Iran remains unclear, although the satellite imagery released by the White House offers strong clues.

In recent years, Iran and its proxies have launched a number of attacks on American troops in Iraq and Syria with armed drones that U.S. officials believe were designed and produced domestically. On Oct. 20, Iran launched five so-called suicide drones at the American base at Al Tanf in southern Syria, though only two exploded on impact as intended.

 

U.S. military leaders believed that attacks with similar drones earlier last year were carried out in Iraq by Iranian-backed militias.

In addition to drones, Iran has an increasingly sophisticated arsenal of long-range missiles it could potentially provide to Russia, such as those used in an attack on U.S. bases in Iraq two years ago that resulted in numerous American injuries.

The Pentagon has not invested heavily in suicide drones, which can be small enough to fit into a backpack, but it has purchased a short-range version called a Switchblade.

Mr. Biden authorized the transfer of 100 Switchblade drones from Pentagon stockpiles to Ukraine in March, and 120 drones called Phoenix Ghost that officials said were similar to the Switchblade in April. In May, the Pentagon announced that it had committed 700 Switchblade drones to Ukraine since the beginning of the Biden administration.”