"A group of right-wing House
Republicans pushing to load up the annual defense bill with socially
conservative policies on abortion, race and gender have another demand: severe
restrictions on U.S. military support for Zelenskyy.
The pressure raises the prospect of
a divisive floor fight over America’s backing for the conflict effort just as
President Biden tries to rally European allies to support
Kyiv in its conflict with Russia.
The group’s proposals on military
aid stand no chance of passing the House, where there continues to be strong
bipartisan support for backing Ukraine’s conflict effort, or going anywhere in
the Senate. But the far right’s insistence on casting votes on the matter
anyway has further imperiled the defense legislation and
transformed what is ordinarily a broadly supported measure that provides the
annual pay raise to U.S. military personnel and sets Pentagon policy into a
partisan battleground that has placed Republican divisions on display.
The House on Wednesday began
debating the $886 billion measure, sidestepping the rifts as Republican leaders
toiled behind the scenes to placate ultraconservative lawmakers who are
demanding votes to scale back Ukraine aid and add social policy dictates. But
those disputes will eventually have to be resolved to pass the bill, which had
been expected to receive approval on Friday — a timetable that is now in doubt
as the hard right threatens to hold up the process.
They are seeking votes on a series of proposals that would
hamstring U.S. support for Ukraine, including one to curtail all funding for
Kyiv until there is a diplomatic solution to the conflict and another that
would end a $300 million program to train and equip Ukrainian soldiers that has
been in place for nearly a decade.
“Congress should not authorize another penny for Ukraine and
push the Biden administration to pursue peace,” Representative Marjorie Taylor
Greene, Republican of Georgia, argued to lawmakers on the House Rules Committee
this week, appealing to them to allow votes on several proposals she has
written on the topic. “Ukraine is not the 51st state of the United States of
America.”
Representative Scott Perry, Republican
of Pennsylvania and the chairman of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, said
votes to curtail support for Ukraine were every bit as important to the members
of his group as votes to restrict abortion access and services for transgender
soldiers. Asked whether some might seek to block the bill without such votes,
he replied: “They might.”
Because Speaker Kevin McCarthy holds only a slim margin of
control in the House, any rebellion by the right wing could stop the defense
measure in its tracks, denying him the votes he would need from his side to
advance it to final passage. But if he bows to the demands for votes on
Ukraine, it would put divisions in Congress over the conflict on display at a
critical junction in Ukraine’s counteroffensive, and just after Mr. Biden has
appealed to allies this week during a NATO summit to remain united in support.
Some mainstream Republicans say they
relish the fight, seeing it as a potential opportunity to put the rebellious
right wing of the party in its place.
“It’s going to fail big time,”
Representative Mike D. Rogers, Republican of Alabama, said of the hard right’s
bid to scrap American support for Ukraine. “So I hope they make it in order — I
think you’ll see it go down overwhelmingly.”
The defense bill is the latest forum
right-wing lawmakers have been using to challenge Mr. McCarthy’s leadership.
Their protest, which began during January’s protracted speaker fight, resumed
last month, when 11 far-right lawmakers brought the House floor to a standstill
to express their fury at Mr. McCarthy’s debt ceiling deal with President Biden.
They have threatened similar tactics in the future if he fails to bow to their
demands.
Mr. McCarthy had been bracing for a
difficult fight over Ukraine funding in the coming months, when the Biden
administration is expected to request billions of dollars to keep Kyiv’s machines
humming.
Hoping to head off a revolt from the right wing, the speaker
publicly declared he was opposed to any additional funding for Ukraine beyond
the limits of the debt ceiling deal, despite having publicly proclaimed just weeks
before: “I vote for aid for Ukraine, I support aid for Ukraine.”
But with the defense bill, the
ultraconservative faction is trying to force the issue now.
Ms. Greene, who has become one of
Mr. McCarthy’s closest allies, demurred on Wednesday when asked whether she
would help other right-wing members block progress on the bill if leaders
denied her a vote to curtail Ukraine funding. Ms. Greene, despite being one of
the most outspoken hard-right members of the House, has routinely taken Mr.
McCarthy’s side in disputes with his rank and file, and has refused to lend any
support to the efforts to undermine his leadership. But her involvement is an
indicator of how deeply a vote on Ukraine might split House Republicans.
Ukraine assistance is a tricky issue for the G.O.P.
politically. Both of the front-runners for the 2024 Republican presidential
nomination, former President Donald J. Trump and Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida,
have said they would like to limit U.S. assistance to Ukraine. According to a
recent poll by the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute, while
more than 70 percent of Republicans want to see Ukraine win the conflict, only
half support sending U.S. military aid to help the country.
Last year, 57 House Republicans voted against a measure
to provide $40 billion in military and humanitarian assistance for Ukraine.
Congress approved a total of more than $113 billion in Ukraine aid last year.
House G.O.P. leaders expressed
confidence on Wednesday that they could defeat any proposal to strip funding
for Ukraine, thus preserving the integrity of the underlying defense bill. But
they worried aloud about the social policy measures, which they noted would
alienate Democrats whose votes would be needed to pass the bill.
Ultraconservatives are pushing for
votes on proposals that would undo a Pentagon policy offering time off and
travel reimbursement to service members traveling out of state to obtain an
abortion, to end diversity training in the military, and to ensure that medical
services for transgender troops are limited.
“Those I think are actually dicier,”
said Representative Tom Cole, Republican of Oklahoma and the chairman of the
Rules Committee. “You’re not going to get any Democrats that way.”
G.O.P. leaders appealed to their
colleagues on Wednesday to support the bill as is, highlighting provisions
already included that would ban drag shows at military installations and the
teaching of critical race theory.
“This bill goes after the woke,
failed, far-left policies that far-left Democrats have wrongfully forced onto
the Department of Defense and our men and women in uniform,” Representative
Elise Stefanik of New York, the No. 4 Republican, told reporters.”
Komentarų nėra:
Rašyti komentarą